Cargando…
Can Orthodontic Treatment Be Stable 20 Years after the End of the Treatment Scheme? Treatment of a Class 2, Division 1 Malocclusion with Severe Skeletal Discrepancy and Its 20-Year Follow-Up
Class II malocclusions, after class I malocclusions, are the most frequent in the juvenile Italian population. They are most often skeletal in origin and due to mandibular retrusion. Functional devices seem to have a beneficial effect on the growth of the jaw. Long-term maintenance of the achieved r...
Autores principales: | Aiello, Domenico, Nucera, Riccardo, Costa, Stefania, Figliuzzi, Michele Mario, Paduano, Sergio |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4810584 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Simplified Digital Approach to the Treatment of a Postpuberty Patient with a Class III Malocclusion and Bilateral Crossbite
por: Aiello, Domenico, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Surgical–orthodontic treatment of a skeletal class III malocclusion
por: Katiyar, Radha, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Compensatory orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion
with anterior crossbite
por: Valladares Neto, José
Publicado: (2014) -
Treatment of a Class II Division 2 Patient with Severe Skeletal
Discrepancy by Using a Custom Made TPA Proclination Spring
por: Paduano, Sergio, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Rationale, Relevance, and Efficacy of “Surgery First, Orthodontics Later” Approach in the Management of Cases of Severe Malocclusion with Skeletal Discrepancy
por: Jeyaraj, Priya, et al.
Publicado: (2019)