Cargando…

Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity?

OBJECTIVE: The demand for spinal fusion is increasing, with concurrent reports of iatrogenic adult spinal deformity (flatback deformity) possibly due to inappropriate lordosis distribution. This distribution is assessed using the lordosis distribution index (LDI) which describes the upper and lower...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bari, Tanvir Johanning, Heegaard, Martin, Bech-Azeddine, Rachid, Dahl, Benny, Gehrchen, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610685
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040744.372
_version_ 1784579916546703360
author Bari, Tanvir Johanning
Heegaard, Martin
Bech-Azeddine, Rachid
Dahl, Benny
Gehrchen, Martin
author_facet Bari, Tanvir Johanning
Heegaard, Martin
Bech-Azeddine, Rachid
Dahl, Benny
Gehrchen, Martin
author_sort Bari, Tanvir Johanning
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The demand for spinal fusion is increasing, with concurrent reports of iatrogenic adult spinal deformity (flatback deformity) possibly due to inappropriate lordosis distribution. This distribution is assessed using the lordosis distribution index (LDI) which describes the upper and lower arc lordosis ratio. Maldistributed LDI has been associated to adjacent segment disease following interbody fusion, although correlation to later-stage deformity is yet to be assessed. We therefore aimed to investigate if hypolordotic lordosis maldistribution was associated to radiographic deformity-surrogates or revision surgery following instrumented lumbar fusion. METHODS: All patients undergoing fusion surgery (≤ 4 vertebra) for degenerative lumbar diseases were retrospectively included at a single center. Patients were categorized according to their postoperative LDI as: “normal” (LDI 50–80), “hypolordotic” (LDI<50), or “hyperlordotic” (LDI>80). RESULTS: We included 149 patients who were followed for 21±14 months. Most attained a normally distributed lordosis (62%). The hypolordotic group had increased postoperative pelvic tilt (PT) (p<0.001), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI–LL) mismatch (p<0.001) and decreased global lordosis (p=0.007) compared to the normal group. Survival analyses revealed a significant difference in revision surgery (p=0.03), and subsequent multivariable logistic regression showed increased odds of 1-year revision in the hypolordotic group (p=0.04). There was also a negative, linear correlation between preoperative pelvic incidence (PI) and postoperative LDI (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusion surgery, hypolordotic lordosis maldistribution (LDI<50) was associated to increased risk of revision surgery, increased postoperative PT and PI–LL mismatch. Lordosis distribution should be considered prior to spinal fusion, especially in high PI patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8497240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84972402021-10-15 Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity? Bari, Tanvir Johanning Heegaard, Martin Bech-Azeddine, Rachid Dahl, Benny Gehrchen, Martin Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: The demand for spinal fusion is increasing, with concurrent reports of iatrogenic adult spinal deformity (flatback deformity) possibly due to inappropriate lordosis distribution. This distribution is assessed using the lordosis distribution index (LDI) which describes the upper and lower arc lordosis ratio. Maldistributed LDI has been associated to adjacent segment disease following interbody fusion, although correlation to later-stage deformity is yet to be assessed. We therefore aimed to investigate if hypolordotic lordosis maldistribution was associated to radiographic deformity-surrogates or revision surgery following instrumented lumbar fusion. METHODS: All patients undergoing fusion surgery (≤ 4 vertebra) for degenerative lumbar diseases were retrospectively included at a single center. Patients were categorized according to their postoperative LDI as: “normal” (LDI 50–80), “hypolordotic” (LDI<50), or “hyperlordotic” (LDI>80). RESULTS: We included 149 patients who were followed for 21±14 months. Most attained a normally distributed lordosis (62%). The hypolordotic group had increased postoperative pelvic tilt (PT) (p<0.001), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI–LL) mismatch (p<0.001) and decreased global lordosis (p=0.007) compared to the normal group. Survival analyses revealed a significant difference in revision surgery (p=0.03), and subsequent multivariable logistic regression showed increased odds of 1-year revision in the hypolordotic group (p=0.04). There was also a negative, linear correlation between preoperative pelvic incidence (PI) and postoperative LDI (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusion surgery, hypolordotic lordosis maldistribution (LDI<50) was associated to increased risk of revision surgery, increased postoperative PT and PI–LL mismatch. Lordosis distribution should be considered prior to spinal fusion, especially in high PI patients. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-09 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8497240/ /pubmed/34610685 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040744.372 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bari, Tanvir Johanning
Heegaard, Martin
Bech-Azeddine, Rachid
Dahl, Benny
Gehrchen, Martin
Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity?
title Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity?
title_full Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity?
title_fullStr Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity?
title_full_unstemmed Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity?
title_short Lordosis Distribution Index in Short-Segment Lumbar Spine Fusion – Can Ideal Lordosis Reduce Revision Surgery and Iatrogenic Deformity?
title_sort lordosis distribution index in short-segment lumbar spine fusion – can ideal lordosis reduce revision surgery and iatrogenic deformity?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610685
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040744.372
work_keys_str_mv AT baritanvirjohanning lordosisdistributionindexinshortsegmentlumbarspinefusioncanideallordosisreducerevisionsurgeryandiatrogenicdeformity
AT heegaardmartin lordosisdistributionindexinshortsegmentlumbarspinefusioncanideallordosisreducerevisionsurgeryandiatrogenicdeformity
AT bechazeddinerachid lordosisdistributionindexinshortsegmentlumbarspinefusioncanideallordosisreducerevisionsurgeryandiatrogenicdeformity
AT dahlbenny lordosisdistributionindexinshortsegmentlumbarspinefusioncanideallordosisreducerevisionsurgeryandiatrogenicdeformity
AT gehrchenmartin lordosisdistributionindexinshortsegmentlumbarspinefusioncanideallordosisreducerevisionsurgeryandiatrogenicdeformity