Cargando…

Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients

OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierce, Katherine E., Passias, Peter G., Brown, Avery E., Bortz, Cole A., Alas, Haddy, Passfall, Lara, Krol, Oscar, Kummer, Nicholas, Lafage, Renaud, Chou, Dean, Burton, Douglas C., Line, Breton, Klineberg, Eric, Hart, Robert, Gum, Jeffrey, Daniels, Alan, Hamilton, Kojo, Bess, Shay, Protopsaltis, Themistocles, Shaffrey, Christopher, Schwab, Frank A., Smith, Justin S., Lafage, Virginie, Ames, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610683
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040540.270
_version_ 1784579919554019328
author Pierce, Katherine E.
Passias, Peter G.
Brown, Avery E.
Bortz, Cole A.
Alas, Haddy
Passfall, Lara
Krol, Oscar
Kummer, Nicholas
Lafage, Renaud
Chou, Dean
Burton, Douglas C.
Line, Breton
Klineberg, Eric
Hart, Robert
Gum, Jeffrey
Daniels, Alan
Hamilton, Kojo
Bess, Shay
Protopsaltis, Themistocles
Shaffrey, Christopher
Schwab, Frank A.
Smith, Justin S.
Lafage, Virginie
Ames, Christopher
author_facet Pierce, Katherine E.
Passias, Peter G.
Brown, Avery E.
Bortz, Cole A.
Alas, Haddy
Passfall, Lara
Krol, Oscar
Kummer, Nicholas
Lafage, Renaud
Chou, Dean
Burton, Douglas C.
Line, Breton
Klineberg, Eric
Hart, Robert
Gum, Jeffrey
Daniels, Alan
Hamilton, Kojo
Bess, Shay
Protopsaltis, Themistocles
Shaffrey, Christopher
Schwab, Frank A.
Smith, Justin S.
Lafage, Virginie
Ames, Christopher
author_sort Pierce, Katherine E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical [C] or cervicothoracic [CT] Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (< 4 cm) and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS–CL) (< 15°) were excluded. Patients assessed: meeting minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for NDI (< -15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by primary Ames driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cutoffs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CD patients (mean age, 62.1 years; 64% female; body mass index, 28.8 kg/m(2)). Forty-one point six percent of patients met MCID for NDI. A backwards linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R(2) of 0.820 (p=0.032) included TS–CL, cSVA, McGregor’s slope (MGS), C2 sacral slope, C2–T3 angle, C2–T3 SVA, cervical lordosis. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the 2 groups (p>0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cutoffs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥ 42.5° C2–T3 angle, > 35.4° cervical lordosis, < -31.76° C2 slope, < -11.57-mm cSVA, < -2.16° MGS, > -30.8-mm C2–T3 SVA, and ≤ -33.6° TS–CL. CONCLUSION: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8497252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84972522021-10-15 Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients Pierce, Katherine E. Passias, Peter G. Brown, Avery E. Bortz, Cole A. Alas, Haddy Passfall, Lara Krol, Oscar Kummer, Nicholas Lafage, Renaud Chou, Dean Burton, Douglas C. Line, Breton Klineberg, Eric Hart, Robert Gum, Jeffrey Daniels, Alan Hamilton, Kojo Bess, Shay Protopsaltis, Themistocles Shaffrey, Christopher Schwab, Frank A. Smith, Justin S. Lafage, Virginie Ames, Christopher Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical [C] or cervicothoracic [CT] Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (< 4 cm) and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS–CL) (< 15°) were excluded. Patients assessed: meeting minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for NDI (< -15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by primary Ames driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cutoffs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CD patients (mean age, 62.1 years; 64% female; body mass index, 28.8 kg/m(2)). Forty-one point six percent of patients met MCID for NDI. A backwards linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R(2) of 0.820 (p=0.032) included TS–CL, cSVA, McGregor’s slope (MGS), C2 sacral slope, C2–T3 angle, C2–T3 SVA, cervical lordosis. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the 2 groups (p>0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cutoffs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥ 42.5° C2–T3 angle, > 35.4° cervical lordosis, < -31.76° C2 slope, < -11.57-mm cSVA, < -2.16° MGS, > -30.8-mm C2–T3 SVA, and ≤ -33.6° TS–CL. CONCLUSION: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-09 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8497252/ /pubmed/34610683 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040540.270 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pierce, Katherine E.
Passias, Peter G.
Brown, Avery E.
Bortz, Cole A.
Alas, Haddy
Passfall, Lara
Krol, Oscar
Kummer, Nicholas
Lafage, Renaud
Chou, Dean
Burton, Douglas C.
Line, Breton
Klineberg, Eric
Hart, Robert
Gum, Jeffrey
Daniels, Alan
Hamilton, Kojo
Bess, Shay
Protopsaltis, Themistocles
Shaffrey, Christopher
Schwab, Frank A.
Smith, Justin S.
Lafage, Virginie
Ames, Christopher
Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients
title Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients
title_full Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients
title_fullStr Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients
title_short Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients
title_sort prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for cervical deformity patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610683
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040540.270
work_keys_str_mv AT piercekatherinee prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT passiaspeterg prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT brownaverye prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT bortzcolea prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT alashaddy prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT passfalllara prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT kroloscar prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT kummernicholas prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT lafagerenaud prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT choudean prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT burtondouglasc prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT linebreton prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT klinebergeric prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT hartrobert prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT gumjeffrey prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT danielsalan prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT hamiltonkojo prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT bessshay prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT protopsaltisthemistocles prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT shaffreychristopher prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT schwabfranka prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT smithjustins prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT lafagevirginie prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT ameschristopher prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients
AT prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients