Cargando…
Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients
OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610683 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040540.270 |
_version_ | 1784579919554019328 |
---|---|
author | Pierce, Katherine E. Passias, Peter G. Brown, Avery E. Bortz, Cole A. Alas, Haddy Passfall, Lara Krol, Oscar Kummer, Nicholas Lafage, Renaud Chou, Dean Burton, Douglas C. Line, Breton Klineberg, Eric Hart, Robert Gum, Jeffrey Daniels, Alan Hamilton, Kojo Bess, Shay Protopsaltis, Themistocles Shaffrey, Christopher Schwab, Frank A. Smith, Justin S. Lafage, Virginie Ames, Christopher |
author_facet | Pierce, Katherine E. Passias, Peter G. Brown, Avery E. Bortz, Cole A. Alas, Haddy Passfall, Lara Krol, Oscar Kummer, Nicholas Lafage, Renaud Chou, Dean Burton, Douglas C. Line, Breton Klineberg, Eric Hart, Robert Gum, Jeffrey Daniels, Alan Hamilton, Kojo Bess, Shay Protopsaltis, Themistocles Shaffrey, Christopher Schwab, Frank A. Smith, Justin S. Lafage, Virginie Ames, Christopher |
author_sort | Pierce, Katherine E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical [C] or cervicothoracic [CT] Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (< 4 cm) and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS–CL) (< 15°) were excluded. Patients assessed: meeting minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for NDI (< -15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by primary Ames driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cutoffs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CD patients (mean age, 62.1 years; 64% female; body mass index, 28.8 kg/m(2)). Forty-one point six percent of patients met MCID for NDI. A backwards linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R(2) of 0.820 (p=0.032) included TS–CL, cSVA, McGregor’s slope (MGS), C2 sacral slope, C2–T3 angle, C2–T3 SVA, cervical lordosis. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the 2 groups (p>0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cutoffs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥ 42.5° C2–T3 angle, > 35.4° cervical lordosis, < -31.76° C2 slope, < -11.57-mm cSVA, < -2.16° MGS, > -30.8-mm C2–T3 SVA, and ≤ -33.6° TS–CL. CONCLUSION: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8497252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84972522021-10-15 Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients Pierce, Katherine E. Passias, Peter G. Brown, Avery E. Bortz, Cole A. Alas, Haddy Passfall, Lara Krol, Oscar Kummer, Nicholas Lafage, Renaud Chou, Dean Burton, Douglas C. Line, Breton Klineberg, Eric Hart, Robert Gum, Jeffrey Daniels, Alan Hamilton, Kojo Bess, Shay Protopsaltis, Themistocles Shaffrey, Christopher Schwab, Frank A. Smith, Justin S. Lafage, Virginie Ames, Christopher Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical [C] or cervicothoracic [CT] Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (< 4 cm) and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS–CL) (< 15°) were excluded. Patients assessed: meeting minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for NDI (< -15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by primary Ames driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cutoffs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CD patients (mean age, 62.1 years; 64% female; body mass index, 28.8 kg/m(2)). Forty-one point six percent of patients met MCID for NDI. A backwards linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R(2) of 0.820 (p=0.032) included TS–CL, cSVA, McGregor’s slope (MGS), C2 sacral slope, C2–T3 angle, C2–T3 SVA, cervical lordosis. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the 2 groups (p>0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cutoffs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥ 42.5° C2–T3 angle, > 35.4° cervical lordosis, < -31.76° C2 slope, < -11.57-mm cSVA, < -2.16° MGS, > -30.8-mm C2–T3 SVA, and ≤ -33.6° TS–CL. CONCLUSION: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-09 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8497252/ /pubmed/34610683 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040540.270 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pierce, Katherine E. Passias, Peter G. Brown, Avery E. Bortz, Cole A. Alas, Haddy Passfall, Lara Krol, Oscar Kummer, Nicholas Lafage, Renaud Chou, Dean Burton, Douglas C. Line, Breton Klineberg, Eric Hart, Robert Gum, Jeffrey Daniels, Alan Hamilton, Kojo Bess, Shay Protopsaltis, Themistocles Shaffrey, Christopher Schwab, Frank A. Smith, Justin S. Lafage, Virginie Ames, Christopher Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients |
title | Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients |
title_full | Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients |
title_fullStr | Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients |
title_short | Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients |
title_sort | prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for cervical deformity patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610683 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040540.270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piercekatherinee prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT passiaspeterg prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT brownaverye prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT bortzcolea prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT alashaddy prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT passfalllara prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT kroloscar prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT kummernicholas prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT lafagerenaud prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT choudean prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT burtondouglasc prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT linebreton prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT klinebergeric prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT hartrobert prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT gumjeffrey prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT danielsalan prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT hamiltonkojo prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT bessshay prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT protopsaltisthemistocles prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT shaffreychristopher prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT schwabfranka prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT smithjustins prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT lafagevirginie prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT ameschristopher prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients AT prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforcervicaldeformitypatients |