Cargando…

A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre

AIMS: We aimed to detail the early clinical experience with pVAD 5.5 at a large academic medical centre. Impella® 5.5 (Abiomed) is a temporary peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device (pVAD) used for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). This system has several modifications aimed at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennel, Peter J., Lumish, Heidi, Kaku, Yuji, Fried, Justin, Kirtane, Ajay J., Karmpaliotis, Dimitri, Takayama, Hiroo, Naka, Yoshifumi, Sayer, Gabriel, Uriel, Nir, Takeda, Koji, Masoumi, Amirali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34402210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13512
_version_ 1784579936398344192
author Kennel, Peter J.
Lumish, Heidi
Kaku, Yuji
Fried, Justin
Kirtane, Ajay J.
Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
Takayama, Hiroo
Naka, Yoshifumi
Sayer, Gabriel
Uriel, Nir
Takeda, Koji
Masoumi, Amirali
author_facet Kennel, Peter J.
Lumish, Heidi
Kaku, Yuji
Fried, Justin
Kirtane, Ajay J.
Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
Takayama, Hiroo
Naka, Yoshifumi
Sayer, Gabriel
Uriel, Nir
Takeda, Koji
Masoumi, Amirali
author_sort Kennel, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We aimed to detail the early clinical experience with pVAD 5.5 at a large academic medical centre. Impella® 5.5 (Abiomed) is a temporary peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device (pVAD) used for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). This system has several modifications aimed at improving deliverability and durability over the pVAD 5.0 system, but real‐world experience with this device remains limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected clinical and outcome data on all patients supported with pVAD 5.5 at our centre between February and December 2020, including procedural and device‐related complications. Fourteen patients with pVAD 5.5 were included. Aetiology of CS was acute myocardial infarction (n = 6), decompensated heart failure (n = 6), suspected myocarditis (n = 1), and post‐cardiotomy CS (n = 1). Four patients received pVAD 5.5 after being on inotropes alone, two were escalated from intra‐aortic balloon pump, two were escalated from pVAD CP, and six patients were transitioned to pVAD 5.5 from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Median duration of pVAD 5.5 support was 12 (interquartile range 7, 25) days. Complications included axillary insertion site haematoma (n = 3), acute kidney injury (n = 3), severe thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and stroke (n = 1). No valve injury or limb complications occurred. Survival to device explant for recovery or transition to another therapy was 11/14 (79%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this early experience of the pVAD 5.5, procedural and device‐related complications were observed but were manageable, and overall survival was high in this critically ill cohort, particularly when the device was used as a bridge to other therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8497328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84973282021-10-12 A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre Kennel, Peter J. Lumish, Heidi Kaku, Yuji Fried, Justin Kirtane, Ajay J. Karmpaliotis, Dimitri Takayama, Hiroo Naka, Yoshifumi Sayer, Gabriel Uriel, Nir Takeda, Koji Masoumi, Amirali ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: We aimed to detail the early clinical experience with pVAD 5.5 at a large academic medical centre. Impella® 5.5 (Abiomed) is a temporary peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device (pVAD) used for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). This system has several modifications aimed at improving deliverability and durability over the pVAD 5.0 system, but real‐world experience with this device remains limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected clinical and outcome data on all patients supported with pVAD 5.5 at our centre between February and December 2020, including procedural and device‐related complications. Fourteen patients with pVAD 5.5 were included. Aetiology of CS was acute myocardial infarction (n = 6), decompensated heart failure (n = 6), suspected myocarditis (n = 1), and post‐cardiotomy CS (n = 1). Four patients received pVAD 5.5 after being on inotropes alone, two were escalated from intra‐aortic balloon pump, two were escalated from pVAD CP, and six patients were transitioned to pVAD 5.5 from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Median duration of pVAD 5.5 support was 12 (interquartile range 7, 25) days. Complications included axillary insertion site haematoma (n = 3), acute kidney injury (n = 3), severe thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and stroke (n = 1). No valve injury or limb complications occurred. Survival to device explant for recovery or transition to another therapy was 11/14 (79%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this early experience of the pVAD 5.5, procedural and device‐related complications were observed but were manageable, and overall survival was high in this critically ill cohort, particularly when the device was used as a bridge to other therapies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8497328/ /pubmed/34402210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13512 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Kennel, Peter J.
Lumish, Heidi
Kaku, Yuji
Fried, Justin
Kirtane, Ajay J.
Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
Takayama, Hiroo
Naka, Yoshifumi
Sayer, Gabriel
Uriel, Nir
Takeda, Koji
Masoumi, Amirali
A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
title A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
title_full A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
title_fullStr A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
title_full_unstemmed A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
title_short A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
title_sort case series analysis on the clinical experience of impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34402210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13512
work_keys_str_mv AT kennelpeterj acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT lumishheidi acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT kakuyuji acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT friedjustin acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT kirtaneajayj acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT karmpaliotisdimitri acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT takayamahiroo acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT nakayoshifumi acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT sayergabriel acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT urielnir acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT takedakoji acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT masoumiamirali acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT kennelpeterj caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT lumishheidi caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT kakuyuji caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT friedjustin caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT kirtaneajayj caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT karmpaliotisdimitri caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT takayamahiroo caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT nakayoshifumi caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT sayergabriel caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT urielnir caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT takedakoji caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre
AT masoumiamirali caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre