Cargando…
A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre
AIMS: We aimed to detail the early clinical experience with pVAD 5.5 at a large academic medical centre. Impella® 5.5 (Abiomed) is a temporary peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device (pVAD) used for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). This system has several modifications aimed at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34402210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13512 |
_version_ | 1784579936398344192 |
---|---|
author | Kennel, Peter J. Lumish, Heidi Kaku, Yuji Fried, Justin Kirtane, Ajay J. Karmpaliotis, Dimitri Takayama, Hiroo Naka, Yoshifumi Sayer, Gabriel Uriel, Nir Takeda, Koji Masoumi, Amirali |
author_facet | Kennel, Peter J. Lumish, Heidi Kaku, Yuji Fried, Justin Kirtane, Ajay J. Karmpaliotis, Dimitri Takayama, Hiroo Naka, Yoshifumi Sayer, Gabriel Uriel, Nir Takeda, Koji Masoumi, Amirali |
author_sort | Kennel, Peter J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: We aimed to detail the early clinical experience with pVAD 5.5 at a large academic medical centre. Impella® 5.5 (Abiomed) is a temporary peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device (pVAD) used for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). This system has several modifications aimed at improving deliverability and durability over the pVAD 5.0 system, but real‐world experience with this device remains limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected clinical and outcome data on all patients supported with pVAD 5.5 at our centre between February and December 2020, including procedural and device‐related complications. Fourteen patients with pVAD 5.5 were included. Aetiology of CS was acute myocardial infarction (n = 6), decompensated heart failure (n = 6), suspected myocarditis (n = 1), and post‐cardiotomy CS (n = 1). Four patients received pVAD 5.5 after being on inotropes alone, two were escalated from intra‐aortic balloon pump, two were escalated from pVAD CP, and six patients were transitioned to pVAD 5.5 from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Median duration of pVAD 5.5 support was 12 (interquartile range 7, 25) days. Complications included axillary insertion site haematoma (n = 3), acute kidney injury (n = 3), severe thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and stroke (n = 1). No valve injury or limb complications occurred. Survival to device explant for recovery or transition to another therapy was 11/14 (79%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this early experience of the pVAD 5.5, procedural and device‐related complications were observed but were manageable, and overall survival was high in this critically ill cohort, particularly when the device was used as a bridge to other therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8497328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84973282021-10-12 A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre Kennel, Peter J. Lumish, Heidi Kaku, Yuji Fried, Justin Kirtane, Ajay J. Karmpaliotis, Dimitri Takayama, Hiroo Naka, Yoshifumi Sayer, Gabriel Uriel, Nir Takeda, Koji Masoumi, Amirali ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: We aimed to detail the early clinical experience with pVAD 5.5 at a large academic medical centre. Impella® 5.5 (Abiomed) is a temporary peripherally inserted left ventricular assist device (pVAD) used for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). This system has several modifications aimed at improving deliverability and durability over the pVAD 5.0 system, but real‐world experience with this device remains limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected clinical and outcome data on all patients supported with pVAD 5.5 at our centre between February and December 2020, including procedural and device‐related complications. Fourteen patients with pVAD 5.5 were included. Aetiology of CS was acute myocardial infarction (n = 6), decompensated heart failure (n = 6), suspected myocarditis (n = 1), and post‐cardiotomy CS (n = 1). Four patients received pVAD 5.5 after being on inotropes alone, two were escalated from intra‐aortic balloon pump, two were escalated from pVAD CP, and six patients were transitioned to pVAD 5.5 from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Median duration of pVAD 5.5 support was 12 (interquartile range 7, 25) days. Complications included axillary insertion site haematoma (n = 3), acute kidney injury (n = 3), severe thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and stroke (n = 1). No valve injury or limb complications occurred. Survival to device explant for recovery or transition to another therapy was 11/14 (79%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this early experience of the pVAD 5.5, procedural and device‐related complications were observed but were manageable, and overall survival was high in this critically ill cohort, particularly when the device was used as a bridge to other therapies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8497328/ /pubmed/34402210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13512 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Kennel, Peter J. Lumish, Heidi Kaku, Yuji Fried, Justin Kirtane, Ajay J. Karmpaliotis, Dimitri Takayama, Hiroo Naka, Yoshifumi Sayer, Gabriel Uriel, Nir Takeda, Koji Masoumi, Amirali A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre |
title | A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre |
title_full | A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre |
title_fullStr | A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre |
title_full_unstemmed | A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre |
title_short | A case series analysis on the clinical experience of Impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre |
title_sort | case series analysis on the clinical experience of impella 5.5® at a large tertiary care centre |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34402210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennelpeterj acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT lumishheidi acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT kakuyuji acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT friedjustin acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT kirtaneajayj acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT karmpaliotisdimitri acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT takayamahiroo acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT nakayoshifumi acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT sayergabriel acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT urielnir acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT takedakoji acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT masoumiamirali acaseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT kennelpeterj caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT lumishheidi caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT kakuyuji caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT friedjustin caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT kirtaneajayj caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT karmpaliotisdimitri caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT takayamahiroo caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT nakayoshifumi caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT sayergabriel caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT urielnir caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT takedakoji caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre AT masoumiamirali caseseriesanalysisontheclinicalexperienceofimpella55atalargetertiarycarecentre |