Cargando…

Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device

Electroencephalographic (EEG) patient monitoring during general anesthesia can help to assess the real-time neurophysiology of unconscious states. Some monitoring systems like the SEDLine Root allow export of the EEG to be used for retrospective analysis. We show that changes made to the SEDLine dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Dincklage, Falk, Jurth, Carlo, Schneider, Gerhard, S García, Paul, Kreuzer, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32813139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00578-9
_version_ 1784579955684802560
author von Dincklage, Falk
Jurth, Carlo
Schneider, Gerhard
S García, Paul
Kreuzer, Matthias
author_facet von Dincklage, Falk
Jurth, Carlo
Schneider, Gerhard
S García, Paul
Kreuzer, Matthias
author_sort von Dincklage, Falk
collection PubMed
description Electroencephalographic (EEG) patient monitoring during general anesthesia can help to assess the real-time neurophysiology of unconscious states. Some monitoring systems like the SEDLine Root allow export of the EEG to be used for retrospective analysis. We show that changes made to the SEDLine display during recording affected the recorded EEG. These changes can strongly impact retrospective analysis of EEG signals. Real-time changes of the feed speed in the SEDLine Root device display modifies the sampling rate of the exported EEG. We used a patient as well as a simulated EEG recording to highlight the effects of the display settings on the extracted EEG. Therefore, we changed EEG feed and amplitude resolution on the display in a systematic manner. To visualize the effects of these changes, we present raw EEG segments and the density spectral array of the recording. Changing the display’s amplitude resolution affects the amplitudes. If the amplitude resolution is too fine, the exported EEG contains clipped amplitudes. If the resolution is too coarse, the EEG resolution becomes too low leading to a low-quality signal making frequency analysis impossible. The proportion of clipped or zero-line data caused by the amplitude setting was > 60% in our sedated patient. Changing the display settings results in undocumented changes in EEG amplitude, sampling rate, and signal quality. The occult nature of these changes could make the analysis of data sets difficult if not invalid. We strongly suggest researchers adequately define and keep the EEG display settings to export good quality EEG and to ensure comparability among patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-020-00578-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8497458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84974582021-10-19 Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device von Dincklage, Falk Jurth, Carlo Schneider, Gerhard S García, Paul Kreuzer, Matthias J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Electroencephalographic (EEG) patient monitoring during general anesthesia can help to assess the real-time neurophysiology of unconscious states. Some monitoring systems like the SEDLine Root allow export of the EEG to be used for retrospective analysis. We show that changes made to the SEDLine display during recording affected the recorded EEG. These changes can strongly impact retrospective analysis of EEG signals. Real-time changes of the feed speed in the SEDLine Root device display modifies the sampling rate of the exported EEG. We used a patient as well as a simulated EEG recording to highlight the effects of the display settings on the extracted EEG. Therefore, we changed EEG feed and amplitude resolution on the display in a systematic manner. To visualize the effects of these changes, we present raw EEG segments and the density spectral array of the recording. Changing the display’s amplitude resolution affects the amplitudes. If the amplitude resolution is too fine, the exported EEG contains clipped amplitudes. If the resolution is too coarse, the EEG resolution becomes too low leading to a low-quality signal making frequency analysis impossible. The proportion of clipped or zero-line data caused by the amplitude setting was > 60% in our sedated patient. Changing the display settings results in undocumented changes in EEG amplitude, sampling rate, and signal quality. The occult nature of these changes could make the analysis of data sets difficult if not invalid. We strongly suggest researchers adequately define and keep the EEG display settings to export good quality EEG and to ensure comparability among patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-020-00578-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-08-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8497458/ /pubmed/32813139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00578-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
von Dincklage, Falk
Jurth, Carlo
Schneider, Gerhard
S García, Paul
Kreuzer, Matthias
Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device
title Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device
title_full Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device
title_fullStr Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device
title_full_unstemmed Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device
title_short Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device
title_sort technical considerations when using the eeg export of the sedline root device
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32813139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00578-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vondincklagefalk technicalconsiderationswhenusingtheeegexportofthesedlinerootdevice
AT jurthcarlo technicalconsiderationswhenusingtheeegexportofthesedlinerootdevice
AT schneidergerhard technicalconsiderationswhenusingtheeegexportofthesedlinerootdevice
AT sgarciapaul technicalconsiderationswhenusingtheeegexportofthesedlinerootdevice
AT kreuzermatthias technicalconsiderationswhenusingtheeegexportofthesedlinerootdevice