Cargando…

Biological data annotation via a human-augmenting AI-based labeling system

Biology has become a prime area for the deployment of deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI), enabled largely by the massive data sets that the field can generate. Key to most AI tasks is the availability of a sufficiently large, labeled data set with which to train AI models. In the context...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Wal, Douwe, Jhun, Iny, Laklouk, Israa, Nirschl, Jeff, Richer, Lara, Rojansky, Rebecca, Theparee, Talent, Wheeler, Joshua, Sander, Jörg, Feng, Felix, Mohamad, Osama, Savarese, Silvio, Socher, Richard, Esteva, Andre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00520-6
Descripción
Sumario:Biology has become a prime area for the deployment of deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI), enabled largely by the massive data sets that the field can generate. Key to most AI tasks is the availability of a sufficiently large, labeled data set with which to train AI models. In the context of microscopy, it is easy to generate image data sets containing millions of cells and structures. However, it is challenging to obtain large-scale high-quality annotations for AI models. Here, we present HALS (Human-Augmenting Labeling System), a human-in-the-loop data labeling AI, which begins uninitialized and learns annotations from a human, in real-time. Using a multi-part AI composed of three deep learning models, HALS learns from just a few examples and immediately decreases the workload of the annotator, while increasing the quality of their annotations. Using a highly repetitive use-case—annotating cell types—and running experiments with seven pathologists—experts at the microscopic analysis of biological specimens—we demonstrate a manual work reduction of 90.60%, and an average data-quality boost of 4.34%, measured across four use-cases and two tissue stain types.