Cargando…
Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests
The 2–2.5 times the simulated sand diameter is widely accepted in giving reasonable DEM simulation results for geotechnical testing. However, it neglects the effect of a specimen height to maximum particle diameter ratio in a specific laboratory test, which may lead to a strong stress concentration...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99473-9 |
_version_ | 1784580000315342848 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yao Li, Jiaping Zhu, Tantan Han, Kuan |
author_facet | Li, Yao Li, Jiaping Zhu, Tantan Han, Kuan |
author_sort | Li, Yao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 2–2.5 times the simulated sand diameter is widely accepted in giving reasonable DEM simulation results for geotechnical testing. However, it neglects the effect of a specimen height to maximum particle diameter ratio in a specific laboratory test, which may lead to a strong stress concentration and flawed simulations. This study compared laboratory simple shear tests with corresponding DEM simulations with different particle sizes. The DEM model used clump rings to simulate physical rings in the test, and decreased the additional stress applied by the widely used wall-type rings. Results showed that (1) DEM models with tested particle size and twofold sand particle size (1D and 2D tests) can better capture the tested stress–strain behavior, volumetric changes, and noncoaxiality, the 4D model has an asymmetrical distribution of contact force and contact number, indicating the specimen is inhomogeneous and has a strong stress concentration. (2) a specimen height to maximum particle diameter ratio smaller than 10 (it is greater than 10 in the ASTM D6528) could provide reasonable macro-meso mechanical behaviors. Similar studies should be carried out after trial tests on determining a reasonable specimen height to maximum particle diameter ratio under the guidance of ASTM D6528. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8497632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84976322021-10-12 Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests Li, Yao Li, Jiaping Zhu, Tantan Han, Kuan Sci Rep Article The 2–2.5 times the simulated sand diameter is widely accepted in giving reasonable DEM simulation results for geotechnical testing. However, it neglects the effect of a specimen height to maximum particle diameter ratio in a specific laboratory test, which may lead to a strong stress concentration and flawed simulations. This study compared laboratory simple shear tests with corresponding DEM simulations with different particle sizes. The DEM model used clump rings to simulate physical rings in the test, and decreased the additional stress applied by the widely used wall-type rings. Results showed that (1) DEM models with tested particle size and twofold sand particle size (1D and 2D tests) can better capture the tested stress–strain behavior, volumetric changes, and noncoaxiality, the 4D model has an asymmetrical distribution of contact force and contact number, indicating the specimen is inhomogeneous and has a strong stress concentration. (2) a specimen height to maximum particle diameter ratio smaller than 10 (it is greater than 10 in the ASTM D6528) could provide reasonable macro-meso mechanical behaviors. Similar studies should be carried out after trial tests on determining a reasonable specimen height to maximum particle diameter ratio under the guidance of ASTM D6528. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8497632/ /pubmed/34620979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99473-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Yao Li, Jiaping Zhu, Tantan Han, Kuan Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests |
title | Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests |
title_full | Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests |
title_fullStr | Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests |
title_short | Size effect on contact behavior in DEM simple shear tests |
title_sort | size effect on contact behavior in dem simple shear tests |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99473-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyao sizeeffectoncontactbehaviorindemsimplesheartests AT lijiaping sizeeffectoncontactbehaviorindemsimplesheartests AT zhutantan sizeeffectoncontactbehaviorindemsimplesheartests AT hankuan sizeeffectoncontactbehaviorindemsimplesheartests |