Cargando…

Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We evaluated clinical outcomes of high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were classified as high-risk prostate cancer and received definitive treatment between 2005 and 2015. Patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chun, Seok-Joo, Kim, Jin Ho, Ku, Ja Hyeon, Kwak, Cheol, Lee, Eun Sik, Kim, Suzy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2021.00486
_version_ 1784580053761261568
author Chun, Seok-Joo
Kim, Jin Ho
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Kwak, Cheol
Lee, Eun Sik
Kim, Suzy
author_facet Chun, Seok-Joo
Kim, Jin Ho
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Kwak, Cheol
Lee, Eun Sik
Kim, Suzy
author_sort Chun, Seok-Joo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We evaluated clinical outcomes of high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were classified as high-risk prostate cancer and received definitive treatment between 2005 and 2015. Patients with previous pelvic radiotherapy, positive lymph node or distant metastasis were excluded. The primary outcomes were prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: Of 583 patients met the inclusion criteria (77 EBRT and 506 RP), the estimated 10-year PCSS was 97.0% in the RP and 95.9% in the EBRT (p = 0.770). No significant difference was seen in the DMFS (p = 0.540), whereas there was a trend in favor of RP over EBRT in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.068). Propensity score matching analysis with confounding variables was done, with 183 patients (66 EBRT and 117 RP) were included. No significant difference in DMFS, PCSS or OS was found. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated similar oncologic PCSS, OS, and DMFS outcomes between EBRT and RP patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8497867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84978672021-10-19 Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer Chun, Seok-Joo Kim, Jin Ho Ku, Ja Hyeon Kwak, Cheol Lee, Eun Sik Kim, Suzy Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: We evaluated clinical outcomes of high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were classified as high-risk prostate cancer and received definitive treatment between 2005 and 2015. Patients with previous pelvic radiotherapy, positive lymph node or distant metastasis were excluded. The primary outcomes were prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: Of 583 patients met the inclusion criteria (77 EBRT and 506 RP), the estimated 10-year PCSS was 97.0% in the RP and 95.9% in the EBRT (p = 0.770). No significant difference was seen in the DMFS (p = 0.540), whereas there was a trend in favor of RP over EBRT in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.068). Propensity score matching analysis with confounding variables was done, with 183 patients (66 EBRT and 117 RP) were included. No significant difference in DMFS, PCSS or OS was found. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated similar oncologic PCSS, OS, and DMFS outcomes between EBRT and RP patients. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2021-09 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8497867/ /pubmed/34610662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2021.00486 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chun, Seok-Joo
Kim, Jin Ho
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Kwak, Cheol
Lee, Eun Sik
Kim, Suzy
Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
title Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
title_full Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
title_short Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
title_sort comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2021.00486
work_keys_str_mv AT chunseokjoo comparisonofradicalprostatectomyandexternalbeamradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancer
AT kimjinho comparisonofradicalprostatectomyandexternalbeamradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancer
AT kujahyeon comparisonofradicalprostatectomyandexternalbeamradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancer
AT kwakcheol comparisonofradicalprostatectomyandexternalbeamradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancer
AT leeeunsik comparisonofradicalprostatectomyandexternalbeamradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancer
AT kimsuzy comparisonofradicalprostatectomyandexternalbeamradiotherapyinhighriskprostatecancer