Cargando…
Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives
The purpose of this study is to highlight the need and the obligation to combine living donation with deceased one, this later is an incomparable source of organ donation, a plea with a triple objective: 1) analyzing the contribution of living donations in terms of numbers, through two elements: the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8498660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659605 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.39.232.30716 |
_version_ | 1784580213918662656 |
---|---|
author | Rekhif, Yassin |
author_facet | Rekhif, Yassin |
author_sort | Rekhif, Yassin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to highlight the need and the obligation to combine living donation with deceased one, this later is an incomparable source of organ donation, a plea with a triple objective: 1) analyzing the contribution of living donations in terms of numbers, through two elements: the degree of involvement of our medico-surgical competencies and our regulations governing organ donations. 2) Showing that, even though optimized, living donations will always fall short of the needs of our patients and are only part of the solution. 3) The other part is deceased donors: a source of donation which can not be substituted by that of the living donors, and which concerns patients awaiting a vital organ with no possibility of another substitute treatment. Patients are sentenced to death if not transplanted in a few weeks. In this respect, only professionalism and full staff availability can rid us of prejudices which unjustly and systematically overwhelm our society with regard to this type of life-saving donations. In countries promoting and performing this source of donation, a national priority planning network has been developed. This program ensures reliable results, based on universal standards for ethics, recruitment, training and organization. For health authorities of these same countries, the sharing of these organs with others countries is irrational and unreasonable. As long as these organs remain the only life-saving for this type of seriously ill patients, and this source of grafts will be insufficient to meet the needs of all their patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8498660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84986602021-10-15 Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives Rekhif, Yassin Pan Afr Med J Perspectives The purpose of this study is to highlight the need and the obligation to combine living donation with deceased one, this later is an incomparable source of organ donation, a plea with a triple objective: 1) analyzing the contribution of living donations in terms of numbers, through two elements: the degree of involvement of our medico-surgical competencies and our regulations governing organ donations. 2) Showing that, even though optimized, living donations will always fall short of the needs of our patients and are only part of the solution. 3) The other part is deceased donors: a source of donation which can not be substituted by that of the living donors, and which concerns patients awaiting a vital organ with no possibility of another substitute treatment. Patients are sentenced to death if not transplanted in a few weeks. In this respect, only professionalism and full staff availability can rid us of prejudices which unjustly and systematically overwhelm our society with regard to this type of life-saving donations. In countries promoting and performing this source of donation, a national priority planning network has been developed. This program ensures reliable results, based on universal standards for ethics, recruitment, training and organization. For health authorities of these same countries, the sharing of these organs with others countries is irrational and unreasonable. As long as these organs remain the only life-saving for this type of seriously ill patients, and this source of grafts will be insufficient to meet the needs of all their patients. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8498660/ /pubmed/34659605 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.39.232.30716 Text en Copyright: Yassin Rekhif et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Perspectives Rekhif, Yassin Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives |
title | Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives |
title_full | Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives |
title_fullStr | Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives |
title_short | Le don d´organes en Algérie: limites et perspectives |
title_sort | le don d´organes en algérie: limites et perspectives |
topic | Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8498660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659605 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.39.232.30716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rekhifyassin ledondorganesenalgerielimitesetperspectives |