Cargando…

Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceived impacts of clinical academic activity among the professions outside medicine. DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: There were two groups of interviewees: Research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, healthcare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newington, Lisa, Alexander, Caroline M, Wells, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050679
_version_ 1784580299898748928
author Newington, Lisa
Alexander, Caroline M
Wells, Mary
author_facet Newington, Lisa
Alexander, Caroline M
Wells, Mary
author_sort Newington, Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceived impacts of clinical academic activity among the professions outside medicine. DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: There were two groups of interviewees: Research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, healthcare scientists, psychologists and pharmacists (NMAHPPs) and managers of these professions. All participants were employed in a single, multisite healthcare organisation in the UK. ANALYSIS: Interview transcripts were analysed using the framework method to identify key themes, subthemes and areas of divergence. RESULTS: Four themes were identified. The first, cultural shifts, described the perceived improvements in the approach to patient care and research culture that were associated with clinical academic activity. The second theme explored visibility and included the positive reputation that clinical academics were identified as bringing to the organisation in contrast with perceived levels of invisibility and inaccessibility of these roles. The third theme identified the impacts of the clinical academic pathways, including the precarity of these roles. The final theme explored making impact tangible, and described interviewees’ suggestions of possible methods to record and demonstrate impact. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived positive impacts of NMAHPP clinical academic activity focused on interlinked positive changes for patients and clinical teams. This included delivery of evidence-based healthcare, patient involvement in clinical decision making and improved staff recruitment and retention. However, the positive impacts of clinical academic activity often centred around individual clinicians and did not necessarily translate throughout the organisation. The current clinical academic pathway was identified as causing tension between the perceived value of clinical academic activity and the need to find sufficient staffing to cover clinical services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84992822021-10-22 Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists Newington, Lisa Alexander, Caroline M Wells, Mary BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceived impacts of clinical academic activity among the professions outside medicine. DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: There were two groups of interviewees: Research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, healthcare scientists, psychologists and pharmacists (NMAHPPs) and managers of these professions. All participants were employed in a single, multisite healthcare organisation in the UK. ANALYSIS: Interview transcripts were analysed using the framework method to identify key themes, subthemes and areas of divergence. RESULTS: Four themes were identified. The first, cultural shifts, described the perceived improvements in the approach to patient care and research culture that were associated with clinical academic activity. The second theme explored visibility and included the positive reputation that clinical academics were identified as bringing to the organisation in contrast with perceived levels of invisibility and inaccessibility of these roles. The third theme identified the impacts of the clinical academic pathways, including the precarity of these roles. The final theme explored making impact tangible, and described interviewees’ suggestions of possible methods to record and demonstrate impact. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived positive impacts of NMAHPP clinical academic activity focused on interlinked positive changes for patients and clinical teams. This included delivery of evidence-based healthcare, patient involvement in clinical decision making and improved staff recruitment and retention. However, the positive impacts of clinical academic activity often centred around individual clinicians and did not necessarily translate throughout the organisation. The current clinical academic pathway was identified as causing tension between the perceived value of clinical academic activity and the need to find sufficient staffing to cover clinical services. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8499282/ /pubmed/34620661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050679 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Newington, Lisa
Alexander, Caroline M
Wells, Mary
Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists
title Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists
title_full Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists
title_fullStr Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists
title_short Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists
title_sort impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050679
work_keys_str_mv AT newingtonlisa impactsofclinicalacademicactivityqualitativeinterviewswithhealthcaremanagersandresearchactivenursesmidwivesalliedhealthprofessionalsandpharmacists
AT alexandercarolinem impactsofclinicalacademicactivityqualitativeinterviewswithhealthcaremanagersandresearchactivenursesmidwivesalliedhealthprofessionalsandpharmacists
AT wellsmary impactsofclinicalacademicactivityqualitativeinterviewswithhealthcaremanagersandresearchactivenursesmidwivesalliedhealthprofessionalsandpharmacists