Cargando…

Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND: Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmid, Gordian L., Kluge, Jeremias, Deutsch, Tobias, Geier, Anne-Kathrin, Bleckwenn, Markus, Unverzagt, Susanne, Frese, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2
_version_ 1784580308892385280
author Schmid, Gordian L.
Kluge, Jeremias
Deutsch, Tobias
Geier, Anne-Kathrin
Bleckwenn, Markus
Unverzagt, Susanne
Frese, Thomas
author_facet Schmid, Gordian L.
Kluge, Jeremias
Deutsch, Tobias
Geier, Anne-Kathrin
Bleckwenn, Markus
Unverzagt, Susanne
Frese, Thomas
author_sort Schmid, Gordian L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances in Germany offer reimbursement for therapy costs, if osteopathy is recommended by a physician. This cross-sectional survey of German general practitioners (GPs) explored beliefs and attitudes towards osteopathic medicine and described their daily interactions with it. METHODS: A random sample of 1000 GPs from all federal states was surveyed by mail using a self-designed questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, and attitudes and expectations towards osteopathy. In particular, participants were asked about indications for osteopathic treatment and their beliefs about its effectiveness for different patient groups and diagnoses. A self-designed score was used to estimate general attitudes towards osteopathy and identify factors correlated with greater openness. Additionally, we performed logistic regression to reveal factors associated with the frequency of recommending osteopathy to patients. RESULTS: Response rate was 34.4%. 46.5% of participants were women, and the median age was 56.0 years. 91.3% of GPs had referred patients to an osteopath, and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy to their patients. However, 57.5% acknowledged having little or no knowledge about osteopathy. Most frequent reasons for a recommendation were spinal column disorders (46.2%), other complaints of the musculoskeletal system (18.2%) and headaches (9.8%). GPs estimated the highest benefit for chronically ill and middle-aged adults. Female gender (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.29–3.38) and personal treatment experiences (OR 5.14; 95%CI 2.72–9.72) were independently positively associated with more frequent treatment recommendation. CONCLUSION: GPs in Germany have frequent contact with osteopathy, and the vast majority have recommended osteopathic treatment to some extent in their practice, with foci and opinions comparable to other Western countries. The discrepancy between GPs making frequent referrals for osteopathic treatment while self-assessing to have little knowledge about it demonstrates need for intensified research on the collaboration with osteopaths and how to best integrate osteopathic treatments. Our results may help to focus future effectiveness studies on most relevant clinical conditions in general practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84994182021-10-08 Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey Schmid, Gordian L. Kluge, Jeremias Deutsch, Tobias Geier, Anne-Kathrin Bleckwenn, Markus Unverzagt, Susanne Frese, Thomas BMC Fam Pract Research BACKGROUND: Osteopathy is a type of complementary medicine based on specific manual techniques. In many countries, including Germany, the profession is not officially regulated, and evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy is insufficient for most diseases. Nevertheless, many health insurances in Germany offer reimbursement for therapy costs, if osteopathy is recommended by a physician. This cross-sectional survey of German general practitioners (GPs) explored beliefs and attitudes towards osteopathic medicine and described their daily interactions with it. METHODS: A random sample of 1000 GPs from all federal states was surveyed by mail using a self-designed questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographics, personal experiences with osteopathy, and attitudes and expectations towards osteopathy. In particular, participants were asked about indications for osteopathic treatment and their beliefs about its effectiveness for different patient groups and diagnoses. A self-designed score was used to estimate general attitudes towards osteopathy and identify factors correlated with greater openness. Additionally, we performed logistic regression to reveal factors associated with the frequency of recommending osteopathy to patients. RESULTS: Response rate was 34.4%. 46.5% of participants were women, and the median age was 56.0 years. 91.3% of GPs had referred patients to an osteopath, and 88.0% had recommended osteopathy to their patients. However, 57.5% acknowledged having little or no knowledge about osteopathy. Most frequent reasons for a recommendation were spinal column disorders (46.2%), other complaints of the musculoskeletal system (18.2%) and headaches (9.8%). GPs estimated the highest benefit for chronically ill and middle-aged adults. Female gender (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.29–3.38) and personal treatment experiences (OR 5.14; 95%CI 2.72–9.72) were independently positively associated with more frequent treatment recommendation. CONCLUSION: GPs in Germany have frequent contact with osteopathy, and the vast majority have recommended osteopathic treatment to some extent in their practice, with foci and opinions comparable to other Western countries. The discrepancy between GPs making frequent referrals for osteopathic treatment while self-assessing to have little knowledge about it demonstrates need for intensified research on the collaboration with osteopaths and how to best integrate osteopathic treatments. Our results may help to focus future effectiveness studies on most relevant clinical conditions in general practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2. BioMed Central 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8499418/ /pubmed/34620110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schmid, Gordian L.
Kluge, Jeremias
Deutsch, Tobias
Geier, Anne-Kathrin
Bleckwenn, Markus
Unverzagt, Susanne
Frese, Thomas
Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_full Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_fullStr Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_full_unstemmed Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_short Osteopathy in Germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
title_sort osteopathy in germany: attitudes, beliefs and handling among general practitioners – results of a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01545-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidgordianl osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT klugejeremias osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT deutschtobias osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT geierannekathrin osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT bleckwennmarkus osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT unverzagtsusanne osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey
AT fresethomas osteopathyingermanyattitudesbeliefsandhandlingamonggeneralpractitionersresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalquestionnairesurvey