Cargando…

Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty

BACKGROUND: Flexural three-point bending tests are useful for characterizing the mechanical properties of plant stems. These tests can be performed with minimal sample preparation, thus allowing tests to be performed relatively quickly. The best-practice for such tests involves long spans with suppo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Nelson, Nathanael, Sutherland, Brandon, Yancey, Michael, Liao, Chung Shan, Stubbs, Christopher J., Cook, Douglas D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00793-8
_version_ 1784580312292917248
author Martin-Nelson, Nathanael
Sutherland, Brandon
Yancey, Michael
Liao, Chung Shan
Stubbs, Christopher J.
Cook, Douglas D.
author_facet Martin-Nelson, Nathanael
Sutherland, Brandon
Yancey, Michael
Liao, Chung Shan
Stubbs, Christopher J.
Cook, Douglas D.
author_sort Martin-Nelson, Nathanael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flexural three-point bending tests are useful for characterizing the mechanical properties of plant stems. These tests can be performed with minimal sample preparation, thus allowing tests to be performed relatively quickly. The best-practice for such tests involves long spans with supports and load placed at nodes. This approach typically provides only one flexural stiffness measurement per specimen. However, by combining flexural tests with analytic equations, it is possible to solve for the mechanical characteristics of individual stem segments. RESULTS: A method is presented for using flexural tests to obtain estimates of flexural stiffness of individual segments. This method pairs physical test data with analytic models to obtain a system of equations. The solution of this system of equations provides values of flexural stiffness for individual stalk segments. Uncertainty in the solved values for flexural stiffness were found to be strongly dependent upon measurement errors. Row-wise scaling of the system of equations reduced the influence of measurement error. Of many possible test combinations, the most advantageous set of tests for performing these measurements were identified. Relationships between measurement uncertainty and solution uncertainty were provided for two different testing methods. CONCLUSIONS: The methods presented in this paper can be used to measure the axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments. However, care must be taken to account for the influence of measurement error as the individual segment method amplifies measurement error. An alternative method involving aggregate flexural stiffness values does not amplify measurement error, but provides lower spatial resolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84994552021-10-08 Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty Martin-Nelson, Nathanael Sutherland, Brandon Yancey, Michael Liao, Chung Shan Stubbs, Christopher J. Cook, Douglas D. Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Flexural three-point bending tests are useful for characterizing the mechanical properties of plant stems. These tests can be performed with minimal sample preparation, thus allowing tests to be performed relatively quickly. The best-practice for such tests involves long spans with supports and load placed at nodes. This approach typically provides only one flexural stiffness measurement per specimen. However, by combining flexural tests with analytic equations, it is possible to solve for the mechanical characteristics of individual stem segments. RESULTS: A method is presented for using flexural tests to obtain estimates of flexural stiffness of individual segments. This method pairs physical test data with analytic models to obtain a system of equations. The solution of this system of equations provides values of flexural stiffness for individual stalk segments. Uncertainty in the solved values for flexural stiffness were found to be strongly dependent upon measurement errors. Row-wise scaling of the system of equations reduced the influence of measurement error. Of many possible test combinations, the most advantageous set of tests for performing these measurements were identified. Relationships between measurement uncertainty and solution uncertainty were provided for two different testing methods. CONCLUSIONS: The methods presented in this paper can be used to measure the axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments. However, care must be taken to account for the influence of measurement error as the individual segment method amplifies measurement error. An alternative method involving aggregate flexural stiffness values does not amplify measurement error, but provides lower spatial resolution. BioMed Central 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8499455/ /pubmed/34620195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00793-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Martin-Nelson, Nathanael
Sutherland, Brandon
Yancey, Michael
Liao, Chung Shan
Stubbs, Christopher J.
Cook, Douglas D.
Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty
title Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty
title_full Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty
title_fullStr Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty
title_short Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty
title_sort axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00793-8
work_keys_str_mv AT martinnelsonnathanael axialvariationinflexuralstiffnessofplantstemsegmentsmeasurementmethodsandtheinfluenceofmeasurementuncertainty
AT sutherlandbrandon axialvariationinflexuralstiffnessofplantstemsegmentsmeasurementmethodsandtheinfluenceofmeasurementuncertainty
AT yanceymichael axialvariationinflexuralstiffnessofplantstemsegmentsmeasurementmethodsandtheinfluenceofmeasurementuncertainty
AT liaochungshan axialvariationinflexuralstiffnessofplantstemsegmentsmeasurementmethodsandtheinfluenceofmeasurementuncertainty
AT stubbschristopherj axialvariationinflexuralstiffnessofplantstemsegmentsmeasurementmethodsandtheinfluenceofmeasurementuncertainty
AT cookdouglasd axialvariationinflexuralstiffnessofplantstemsegmentsmeasurementmethodsandtheinfluenceofmeasurementuncertainty