Cargando…

Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with chest pain represent a large proportion of attendances to emergency departments. In these patients clinicians often consider the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the timely recognition and treatment of which is clinically important. Clinical predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynard, Charles, Martin, Glen P., Kontopantelis, Evangelos, Jenkins, David A., Heagerty, Anthony, McMillan, Brian, Jafar, Anisa, Garlapati, Rajendar, Body, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00105-7
_version_ 1784580312795185152
author Reynard, Charles
Martin, Glen P.
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Jenkins, David A.
Heagerty, Anthony
McMillan, Brian
Jafar, Anisa
Garlapati, Rajendar
Body, Richard
author_facet Reynard, Charles
Martin, Glen P.
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Jenkins, David A.
Heagerty, Anthony
McMillan, Brian
Jafar, Anisa
Garlapati, Rajendar
Body, Richard
author_sort Reynard, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with chest pain represent a large proportion of attendances to emergency departments. In these patients clinicians often consider the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the timely recognition and treatment of which is clinically important. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been used to enhance early diagnosis of AMI. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid is currently in clinical use across Greater Manchester. CPMs have been shown to deteriorate over time through calibration drift. We aim to assess potential calibration drift with T-MACS and compare methods for updating the model. METHODS: We will use routinely collected electronic data from patients who were treated using TMACS at two large NHS hospitals. This is estimated to include approximately 14,000 patient episodes spanning June 2016 to October 2020. The primary outcome of acute myocardial infarction will be sourced from NHS Digital’s admitted patient care dataset. We will assess the calibration drift of the existing model and the benefit of updating the CPM by model recalibration, model extension and dynamic updating. These models will be validated by bootstrapping and one step ahead prequential testing. We will evaluate predictive performance using calibrations plots and c-statistics. We will also examine the reclassification of predicted probability with the updated TMACS model. DISCUSSION: CPMs are widely used in modern medicine, but are vulnerable to deteriorating calibration over time. Ongoing refinement using routinely collected electronic data will inevitably be more efficient than deriving and validating new models. In this analysis we will seek to exemplify methods for updating CPMs to protect the initial investment of time and effort. If successful, the updating methods could be used to continually refine the algorithm used within TMACS, maintaining or even improving predictive performance over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN number: ISRCTN41008456
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84994582021-10-08 Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol Reynard, Charles Martin, Glen P. Kontopantelis, Evangelos Jenkins, David A. Heagerty, Anthony McMillan, Brian Jafar, Anisa Garlapati, Rajendar Body, Richard Diagn Progn Res Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with chest pain represent a large proportion of attendances to emergency departments. In these patients clinicians often consider the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the timely recognition and treatment of which is clinically important. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been used to enhance early diagnosis of AMI. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid is currently in clinical use across Greater Manchester. CPMs have been shown to deteriorate over time through calibration drift. We aim to assess potential calibration drift with T-MACS and compare methods for updating the model. METHODS: We will use routinely collected electronic data from patients who were treated using TMACS at two large NHS hospitals. This is estimated to include approximately 14,000 patient episodes spanning June 2016 to October 2020. The primary outcome of acute myocardial infarction will be sourced from NHS Digital’s admitted patient care dataset. We will assess the calibration drift of the existing model and the benefit of updating the CPM by model recalibration, model extension and dynamic updating. These models will be validated by bootstrapping and one step ahead prequential testing. We will evaluate predictive performance using calibrations plots and c-statistics. We will also examine the reclassification of predicted probability with the updated TMACS model. DISCUSSION: CPMs are widely used in modern medicine, but are vulnerable to deteriorating calibration over time. Ongoing refinement using routinely collected electronic data will inevitably be more efficient than deriving and validating new models. In this analysis we will seek to exemplify methods for updating CPMs to protect the initial investment of time and effort. If successful, the updating methods could be used to continually refine the algorithm used within TMACS, maintaining or even improving predictive performance over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN number: ISRCTN41008456 BioMed Central 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8499458/ /pubmed/34620253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00105-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Protocol
Reynard, Charles
Martin, Glen P.
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Jenkins, David A.
Heagerty, Anthony
McMillan, Brian
Jafar, Anisa
Garlapati, Rajendar
Body, Richard
Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
title Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
title_full Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
title_fullStr Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
title_short Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
title_sort advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model – a large database study protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00105-7
work_keys_str_mv AT reynardcharles advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT martinglenp advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT kontopantelisevangelos advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT jenkinsdavida advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT heagertyanthony advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT mcmillanbrian advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT jafaranisa advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT garlapatirajendar advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol
AT bodyrichard advancedcardiovascularriskpredictionintheemergencydepartmentupdatingaclinicalpredictionmodelalargedatabasestudyprotocol