Cargando…

Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND: Complex interventions in health care are characterized by multiple interacting components as well as by numerous nonlinear interactions with the social systems within which they are being implemented. The process of developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions is therefo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quasdorf, Tina, Clack, Lauren, Laporte Uribe, Franziska, Holle, Daniela, Berwig, Martin, Purwins, Daniel, Schultes, Marie-Therese, Roes, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z
_version_ 1784580314359660544
author Quasdorf, Tina
Clack, Lauren
Laporte Uribe, Franziska
Holle, Daniela
Berwig, Martin
Purwins, Daniel
Schultes, Marie-Therese
Roes, Martina
author_facet Quasdorf, Tina
Clack, Lauren
Laporte Uribe, Franziska
Holle, Daniela
Berwig, Martin
Purwins, Daniel
Schultes, Marie-Therese
Roes, Martina
author_sort Quasdorf, Tina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complex interventions in health care are characterized by multiple interacting components as well as by numerous nonlinear interactions with the social systems within which they are being implemented. The process of developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions is therefore challenging. Established guidance such as the MRC (Medical Research Council) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions refers to process evaluations as an integral part of the development of complex evidence-based interventions. Even though the need for process evaluations is recognized, the realization of such approaches is challenging because methodological instruction is sparse, and the phenomenon of interest is complex. A number of theoretical approaches indicating how to conduct process evaluations of complex interventions in health care exist, but a systematic and comprehensive overview of these is missing. Thus, the objective of the systematic scoping review described herein is to provide an overview and analysis of theoretical approaches suitable for the planning and conducting of process evaluations. METHODS: The design and conduct of this review will follow the procedures of a systematic scoping review. The search strategy will be developed following the BeHEMoTh (Behaviour of interest; Health context; Exclusions; Models or Theories) template which has been conceptualized for structured reviews of theory. The systematic search of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO) and PsycInfo (via EBSCO) electronic databases will be complemented by “hand searching” techniques. Study selection, data extraction, and data analysis will be performed by tandems of two researchers independently of each other. Divergent decisions and judgements between the two researchers will be discussed by the whole review team. DISCUSSION: The findings from this scoping review will provide an overview and comparison of theoretical approaches suitable for process evaluations of complex interventions in health care. The review results will support researchers in choosing the theoretical approach that best fits the respective focus of their process evaluation study. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This study has been registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under registration number CRD42020211732. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84994662021-10-08 Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol Quasdorf, Tina Clack, Lauren Laporte Uribe, Franziska Holle, Daniela Berwig, Martin Purwins, Daniel Schultes, Marie-Therese Roes, Martina Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Complex interventions in health care are characterized by multiple interacting components as well as by numerous nonlinear interactions with the social systems within which they are being implemented. The process of developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions is therefore challenging. Established guidance such as the MRC (Medical Research Council) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions refers to process evaluations as an integral part of the development of complex evidence-based interventions. Even though the need for process evaluations is recognized, the realization of such approaches is challenging because methodological instruction is sparse, and the phenomenon of interest is complex. A number of theoretical approaches indicating how to conduct process evaluations of complex interventions in health care exist, but a systematic and comprehensive overview of these is missing. Thus, the objective of the systematic scoping review described herein is to provide an overview and analysis of theoretical approaches suitable for the planning and conducting of process evaluations. METHODS: The design and conduct of this review will follow the procedures of a systematic scoping review. The search strategy will be developed following the BeHEMoTh (Behaviour of interest; Health context; Exclusions; Models or Theories) template which has been conceptualized for structured reviews of theory. The systematic search of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO) and PsycInfo (via EBSCO) electronic databases will be complemented by “hand searching” techniques. Study selection, data extraction, and data analysis will be performed by tandems of two researchers independently of each other. Divergent decisions and judgements between the two researchers will be discussed by the whole review team. DISCUSSION: The findings from this scoping review will provide an overview and comparison of theoretical approaches suitable for process evaluations of complex interventions in health care. The review results will support researchers in choosing the theoretical approach that best fits the respective focus of their process evaluation study. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This study has been registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under registration number CRD42020211732. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z. BioMed Central 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8499466/ /pubmed/34625119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Quasdorf, Tina
Clack, Lauren
Laporte Uribe, Franziska
Holle, Daniela
Berwig, Martin
Purwins, Daniel
Schultes, Marie-Therese
Roes, Martina
Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
title Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_full Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_short Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_sort theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z
work_keys_str_mv AT quasdorftina theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT clacklauren theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT laporteuribefranziska theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT holledaniela theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT berwigmartin theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT purwinsdaniel theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT schultesmarietherese theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT roesmartina theoreticalapproachestoprocessevaluationsofcomplexinterventionsinhealthcareasystematicscopingreviewprotocol