Cargando…

Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application

Scoping reviews are an increasingly common approach to evidence synthesis with a growing suite of methodological guidance and resources to assist review authors with their planning, conduct and reporting. The latest guidance for scoping reviews includes the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reportin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Peters, Micah D. J., Marnie, Casey, Colquhoun, Heather, Garritty, Chantelle M., Hempel, Susanne, Horsley, Tanya, Langlois, Etienne V., Lillie, Erin, O’Brien, Kelly K., Tunçalp, Ӧzge, Wilson, Michael G., Zarin, Wasifa, Tricco, Andrea C.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2021
Materias:	Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3

Ejemplares similares

Utility of social media and crowd-sourced data for pharmacovigilance: a scoping review protocol
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Correction to: Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Engaging policy-makers, heath system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Utility of social media and crowd-intelligence data for pharmacovigilance: a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Systematic Review of Reporting Tools Applicable to Sexual and Reproductive Health Programmes: Step 1 in Developing Programme Reporting Standards
por: Kågesten, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Operationalizing a Human Rights-Based Approach to Address Mistreatment against Women during Childbirth
por: Zampas, Christina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Exploring women’s experiences during childbirth in health facilities during COVID-19 pandemic in occupied palestinian territory: a cross-sectional community survey
por: ME Abu-Rmeileh, Niveen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps
por: O’Brien, Kelly K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
por: Levac, Danielle, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Prevention and management of unprofessional behaviour among adults in the workplace: A scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Factors influencing appropriate use of interventions for management of women experiencing preterm birth: A mixed-methods systematic review and narrative synthesis
por: Zahroh, Rana Islamiah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Correction: Factors influencing appropriate use of interventions for management of women experiencing preterm birth: A mixed-methods systematic review and narrative synthesis
por: Zahroh, Rana Islamiah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Policies and procedures for personal protective equipment: Does inconsistency increase risk of contamination and infection?
por: Peters, Micah D.J., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Who’s Using PDAs? Estimates of PDA Use by Health Care Providers: A Systematic Review of Surveys
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review
por: Kastner, Monika, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A scoping review of rapid review methods
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Patient safety initiatives in obstetrics: a rapid review
por: Antony, Jesmin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency
por: Garritty, Chantelle M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol
por: Beecher, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
por: Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of herpes zoster vaccines in adults aged 50 and older: systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluative reports on medical malpractice policies in obstetrics: a rapid scoping review
por: Cardoso, Roberta, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
por: Beecher, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Qualitative evidence to improve guidelines and health decision-making
por: Langlois, Etienne V, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Interventions to improve early cancer diagnosis of symptomatic individuals: a scoping review
por: Okoli, George N, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A rapid research needs appraisal methodology to identify evidence gaps to inform clinical research priorities in response to outbreaks—results from the Lassa fever pilot
por: Sigfrid, Louise, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods
por: Polisena, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews
por: King, Valerie J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of a smartphone application for blood pressure estimation in Bangladesh, South Africa, and Tanzania
por: Festo, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage
por: Langlois, Etienne V, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Promoting respect and preventing mistreatment during childbirth
por: Vogel, JP, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Antenatal care for healthy pregnant women: a mapping of interventions from existing guidelines to inform the development of new WHO guidance on antenatal care
por: Abalos, E, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_1l4nm9kaebdji5kjkcun94uesr