Cargando…

Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats

BACKGROUND: The surveillance and control of mosquito-borne diseases is dependent upon understanding the bionomics and distribution of the vectors. Most studies of mosquito assemblages describe species abundance, richness and composition close to the ground defined often by only one sampling method....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebayang, Boni F., Russell, Tanya L., Staunton, Kyran M., Townsend, Michael, Paton, Christopher, Lehmann, Tovi, Burkot, Thomas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04999-6
_version_ 1784580318586470400
author Sebayang, Boni F.
Russell, Tanya L.
Staunton, Kyran M.
Townsend, Michael
Paton, Christopher
Lehmann, Tovi
Burkot, Thomas R.
author_facet Sebayang, Boni F.
Russell, Tanya L.
Staunton, Kyran M.
Townsend, Michael
Paton, Christopher
Lehmann, Tovi
Burkot, Thomas R.
author_sort Sebayang, Boni F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The surveillance and control of mosquito-borne diseases is dependent upon understanding the bionomics and distribution of the vectors. Most studies of mosquito assemblages describe species abundance, richness and composition close to the ground defined often by only one sampling method. In this study, we assessed Australian mosquito species near the ground and in the sub-canopy using two traps baited with a variety of lures. METHODS: Mosquitoes were sampled using a 4 × 4 Latin square design at the Cattana Wetlands, Australia from February to April 2020, using passive box traps with octenol and carbon dioxide and three variations of a sticky net trap (unbaited, and baited with octenol or octenol and carbon dioxide). The traps were deployed at two different heights: ground level (≤ 1 m above the ground) and sub-canopy level (6 m above the ground). RESULTS: In total, 27 mosquito species were identified across the ground and sub-canopy levels from the different traps. The abundance of mosquitoes at the ground level was twofold greater than at the sub-canopy level. While the species richness at ground and sub-canopy levels was not significantly different, species abundance varied by the collection height. CONCLUSIONS: The composition of mosquito population assemblages was correlated with the trap types and heights at which they were deployed. Coquillettidia species, which prefer feeding on birds, were mainly found in the sub-canopy whereas Anopheles farauti, Aedes vigilax and Mansonia uniformis, which have a preference for feeding on large mammals, were predominantly found near the ground. In addition to trap height, environmental factors and mosquito bionomic characteristics (e.g. larval habitat, resting behaviour and host blood preferences) may explain the vertical distribution of mosquitoes. This information is useful to better understand how vectors may acquire and transmit pathogens to hosts living at different heights. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84994912021-10-08 Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats Sebayang, Boni F. Russell, Tanya L. Staunton, Kyran M. Townsend, Michael Paton, Christopher Lehmann, Tovi Burkot, Thomas R. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The surveillance and control of mosquito-borne diseases is dependent upon understanding the bionomics and distribution of the vectors. Most studies of mosquito assemblages describe species abundance, richness and composition close to the ground defined often by only one sampling method. In this study, we assessed Australian mosquito species near the ground and in the sub-canopy using two traps baited with a variety of lures. METHODS: Mosquitoes were sampled using a 4 × 4 Latin square design at the Cattana Wetlands, Australia from February to April 2020, using passive box traps with octenol and carbon dioxide and three variations of a sticky net trap (unbaited, and baited with octenol or octenol and carbon dioxide). The traps were deployed at two different heights: ground level (≤ 1 m above the ground) and sub-canopy level (6 m above the ground). RESULTS: In total, 27 mosquito species were identified across the ground and sub-canopy levels from the different traps. The abundance of mosquitoes at the ground level was twofold greater than at the sub-canopy level. While the species richness at ground and sub-canopy levels was not significantly different, species abundance varied by the collection height. CONCLUSIONS: The composition of mosquito population assemblages was correlated with the trap types and heights at which they were deployed. Coquillettidia species, which prefer feeding on birds, were mainly found in the sub-canopy whereas Anopheles farauti, Aedes vigilax and Mansonia uniformis, which have a preference for feeding on large mammals, were predominantly found near the ground. In addition to trap height, environmental factors and mosquito bionomic characteristics (e.g. larval habitat, resting behaviour and host blood preferences) may explain the vertical distribution of mosquitoes. This information is useful to better understand how vectors may acquire and transmit pathogens to hosts living at different heights. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8499491/ /pubmed/34620217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04999-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sebayang, Boni F.
Russell, Tanya L.
Staunton, Kyran M.
Townsend, Michael
Paton, Christopher
Lehmann, Tovi
Burkot, Thomas R.
Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
title Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
title_full Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
title_fullStr Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
title_full_unstemmed Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
title_short Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
title_sort australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04999-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sebayangbonif australianmosquitoassemblagesvarybetweengroundandsubcanopyhabitats
AT russelltanyal australianmosquitoassemblagesvarybetweengroundandsubcanopyhabitats
AT stauntonkyranm australianmosquitoassemblagesvarybetweengroundandsubcanopyhabitats
AT townsendmichael australianmosquitoassemblagesvarybetweengroundandsubcanopyhabitats
AT patonchristopher australianmosquitoassemblagesvarybetweengroundandsubcanopyhabitats
AT lehmanntovi australianmosquitoassemblagesvarybetweengroundandsubcanopyhabitats
AT burkotthomasr australianmosquitoassemblagesvarybetweengroundandsubcanopyhabitats