Cargando…

Massive aspiration syndrome: a possible indication for “emergent” veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?: a case report

BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is usually performed in cases of severe respiratory failure in which conventional and advanced mechanical ventilation strategies are ineffective in achieving true lung-protective ventilation, thus triggering ventilatory-induced lu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gamberini, Emiliano, Poletti, Venerino, Russo, Emanuele, Circelli, Alessandro, Benni, Marco, Scognamiglio, Giovanni, Santonastaso, Domenico Pietro, Martino, Costanza, Domenichini, Linda, Biondi, Romina, Bastoni, Giorgia, Brogi, Etrusca, Ansaloni, Luca, Coccolini, Federico, Fugazzola, Paola, Spiga, Martina, Agnoletti, Vanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-03050-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is usually performed in cases of severe respiratory failure in which conventional and advanced mechanical ventilation strategies are ineffective in achieving true lung-protective ventilation, thus triggering ventilatory-induced lung injury. If circulatory failure coexists, veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) may be preferred over VV-ECMO because of its potential for circulatory support. In VA-ECMO, the respiratory contribution is less effective and the complication rate is higher than in the VV configuration. CASE PRESENTATION: The authors present a case in which VV-ECMO was performed in an emergency setting to treat a 68-year-old White male patient who experienced acute respiratory failure after massive aspiration. Despite intubation and intensive care unit admission, multiple organ failure occurred suddenly, thus prompting referral to a level-1 trauma center with an ECMO facility. The patient’s condition slowly improved with VV-ECMO support along with standard treatment for hemodynamic impairment. VV-ECMO was discontinued on day 8. The patient was extubated on day 14 and discharged home fully recovered 34 days after the event. CONCLUSIONS: Attention was focused on the decision to initiate VV-ECMO support even in the presence of severe hemodynamic derangement, although VA-ECMO could have provided better hemodynamic support but less effective respiratory support.