Cargando…

Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings

BACKGROUND: Wild populations of Anopheles mosquitoes are generally thought to mate outdoors in swarms, although once colonized, they also mate readily inside laboratory cages. This study investigated whether the malaria vectors Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis can also naturally mate insi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nambunga, Ismail H., Msugupakulya, Betwel J., Hape, Emmanuel E., Mshani, Issa H., Kahamba, Najat F., Mkandawile, Gustav, Mabula, Daniel M., Njalambaha, Rukiyah M., Kaindoa, Emmanuel W., Muyaga, Letus L., Hermy, Marie R. G., Tripet, Frederic, Ferguson, Heather M., Ngowo, Halfan S., Okumu, Fredros O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04989-8
_version_ 1784580335365783552
author Nambunga, Ismail H.
Msugupakulya, Betwel J.
Hape, Emmanuel E.
Mshani, Issa H.
Kahamba, Najat F.
Mkandawile, Gustav
Mabula, Daniel M.
Njalambaha, Rukiyah M.
Kaindoa, Emmanuel W.
Muyaga, Letus L.
Hermy, Marie R. G.
Tripet, Frederic
Ferguson, Heather M.
Ngowo, Halfan S.
Okumu, Fredros O.
author_facet Nambunga, Ismail H.
Msugupakulya, Betwel J.
Hape, Emmanuel E.
Mshani, Issa H.
Kahamba, Najat F.
Mkandawile, Gustav
Mabula, Daniel M.
Njalambaha, Rukiyah M.
Kaindoa, Emmanuel W.
Muyaga, Letus L.
Hermy, Marie R. G.
Tripet, Frederic
Ferguson, Heather M.
Ngowo, Halfan S.
Okumu, Fredros O.
author_sort Nambunga, Ismail H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wild populations of Anopheles mosquitoes are generally thought to mate outdoors in swarms, although once colonized, they also mate readily inside laboratory cages. This study investigated whether the malaria vectors Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis can also naturally mate inside human dwellings. METHOD: Mosquitoes were sampled from three volunteer-occupied experimental huts in a rural Tanzanian village at 6:00 p.m. each evening, after which the huts were completely sealed and sampling was repeated at 11:00 p.m and 6 a.m. the next morning to compare the proportions of inseminated females. Similarly timed collections were done inside local unsealed village houses. Lastly, wild-caught larvae and pupae were introduced inside or outside experimental huts constructed inside two semi-field screened chambers. The huts were then sealed and fitted with exit traps, allowing mosquito egress but not entry. Mating was assessed in subsequent days by sampling and dissecting emergent adults caught indoors, outdoors and in exit traps. RESULTS: Proportions of inseminated females inside the experimental huts in the village increased from approximately  60% at 6 p.m. to approximately 90% the following morning despite no new mosquitoes entering the huts after 6 p.m. Insemination in the local homes increased from approximately 78% to approximately 93% over the same time points. In the semi-field observations of wild-caught captive mosquitoes, the proportions of inseminated An. funestus were 20.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: ± 2.8) outdoors, 25.2% (95% CI: ± 3.4) indoors and 16.8% (± 8.3) in exit traps, while the proportions of inseminated An. arabiensis were 42.3% (95% CI: ± 5.5) outdoors, 47.4% (95% CI: ± 4.7) indoors and 37.1% (CI: ± 6.8) in exit traps. CONCLUSION: Wild populations of An. funestus and An. arabiensis in these study villages can mate both inside and outside human dwellings. Most of the mating clearly happens before the mosquitoes enter houses, but additional mating happens indoors. The ecological significance of such indoor mating remains to be determined. The observed insemination inside the experimental huts fitted with exit traps and in the unsealed village houses suggests that the indoor mating happens voluntarily even under unrestricted egress. These findings may inspire improved vector control, such as by targeting males indoors, and potentially inform alternative methods for colonizing strongly eurygamic Anopheles species (e.g. An. funestus) inside laboratories or semi-field chambers. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-021-04989-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84995722021-10-08 Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings Nambunga, Ismail H. Msugupakulya, Betwel J. Hape, Emmanuel E. Mshani, Issa H. Kahamba, Najat F. Mkandawile, Gustav Mabula, Daniel M. Njalambaha, Rukiyah M. Kaindoa, Emmanuel W. Muyaga, Letus L. Hermy, Marie R. G. Tripet, Frederic Ferguson, Heather M. Ngowo, Halfan S. Okumu, Fredros O. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Wild populations of Anopheles mosquitoes are generally thought to mate outdoors in swarms, although once colonized, they also mate readily inside laboratory cages. This study investigated whether the malaria vectors Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis can also naturally mate inside human dwellings. METHOD: Mosquitoes were sampled from three volunteer-occupied experimental huts in a rural Tanzanian village at 6:00 p.m. each evening, after which the huts were completely sealed and sampling was repeated at 11:00 p.m and 6 a.m. the next morning to compare the proportions of inseminated females. Similarly timed collections were done inside local unsealed village houses. Lastly, wild-caught larvae and pupae were introduced inside or outside experimental huts constructed inside two semi-field screened chambers. The huts were then sealed and fitted with exit traps, allowing mosquito egress but not entry. Mating was assessed in subsequent days by sampling and dissecting emergent adults caught indoors, outdoors and in exit traps. RESULTS: Proportions of inseminated females inside the experimental huts in the village increased from approximately  60% at 6 p.m. to approximately 90% the following morning despite no new mosquitoes entering the huts after 6 p.m. Insemination in the local homes increased from approximately 78% to approximately 93% over the same time points. In the semi-field observations of wild-caught captive mosquitoes, the proportions of inseminated An. funestus were 20.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: ± 2.8) outdoors, 25.2% (95% CI: ± 3.4) indoors and 16.8% (± 8.3) in exit traps, while the proportions of inseminated An. arabiensis were 42.3% (95% CI: ± 5.5) outdoors, 47.4% (95% CI: ± 4.7) indoors and 37.1% (CI: ± 6.8) in exit traps. CONCLUSION: Wild populations of An. funestus and An. arabiensis in these study villages can mate both inside and outside human dwellings. Most of the mating clearly happens before the mosquitoes enter houses, but additional mating happens indoors. The ecological significance of such indoor mating remains to be determined. The observed insemination inside the experimental huts fitted with exit traps and in the unsealed village houses suggests that the indoor mating happens voluntarily even under unrestricted egress. These findings may inspire improved vector control, such as by targeting males indoors, and potentially inform alternative methods for colonizing strongly eurygamic Anopheles species (e.g. An. funestus) inside laboratories or semi-field chambers. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-021-04989-8. BioMed Central 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8499572/ /pubmed/34620227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04989-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nambunga, Ismail H.
Msugupakulya, Betwel J.
Hape, Emmanuel E.
Mshani, Issa H.
Kahamba, Najat F.
Mkandawile, Gustav
Mabula, Daniel M.
Njalambaha, Rukiyah M.
Kaindoa, Emmanuel W.
Muyaga, Letus L.
Hermy, Marie R. G.
Tripet, Frederic
Ferguson, Heather M.
Ngowo, Halfan S.
Okumu, Fredros O.
Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings
title Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings
title_full Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings
title_fullStr Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings
title_full_unstemmed Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings
title_short Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings
title_sort wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34620227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04989-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nambungaismailh wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT msugupakulyabetwelj wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT hapeemmanuele wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT mshaniissah wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT kahambanajatf wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT mkandawilegustav wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT mabuladanielm wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT njalambaharukiyahm wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT kaindoaemmanuelw wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT muyagaletusl wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT hermymarierg wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT tripetfrederic wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT fergusonheatherm wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT ngowohalfans wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings
AT okumufredroso wildpopulationsofmalariavectorscanmatebothinsideandoutsidehumandwellings