Cargando…

Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians

INTRODUCTION: Drexit (“Doctor‐Exit”) is the exponentially growing trend for junior doctors in the UK to walk away from their jobs in the National Health Service (NHS). Our objective was to identify the reasons why junior doctors in the UK leave their NHS training programs to train overseas. MATERIAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Hannah C.P., Abrams, Sarah, Simpkin Begin, Arabella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.419
_version_ 1784580353349910528
author Wilson, Hannah C.P.
Abrams, Sarah
Simpkin Begin, Arabella
author_facet Wilson, Hannah C.P.
Abrams, Sarah
Simpkin Begin, Arabella
author_sort Wilson, Hannah C.P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Drexit (“Doctor‐Exit”) is the exponentially growing trend for junior doctors in the UK to walk away from their jobs in the National Health Service (NHS). Our objective was to identify the reasons why junior doctors in the UK leave their NHS training programs to train overseas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A simultaneous and convergent mixed‐methods study was performed to analyze both an online survey and semi‐structured interviews from junior doctors who had left the NHS. Social media, online professional media, and networks of junior doctors were used to recruit doctors. All were UK medical school graduates who had left the NHS within the last 15 years (2003‐2018). RESULTS: 96.1% (149/155) of respondents reported not being offered an exit interview on leaving the NHS. 94.8% (147/155) of respondents did not regret quitting the NHS. Participants were more satisfied with their pay and work life balance in their overseas posts when compared to training in the NHS (P < 0.05). Burnout was variably defined and was prominent in doctors who left 53.8% (113/210) but was reversed when they practiced medicine overseas in 89.2% (74/83) of cases. Qualitative data identified four key themes which were categorized into push factors, which were lack of interest in retention and bleak outlook; and pull factors, which were financial vs social capital and things are different overseas. CONCLUSION: Listening to the frontline junior doctors' voices lend insights into a better understanding of the push and pull factors that appear to be exacerbating the exodus of junior doctors from the NHS. Our results indicate that exit interviews should be performed routinely. There needs to be a shift to focus on the training of doctors rather than service provision, with efforts to support, appreciate, and value junior doctors. Further exploration is needed to identify what is happening in training programs overseas to improve retention within the NHS. Furthermore, identifying issues perceived by junior doctors in the UK in the context of workforce planning may be applicable to healthcare systems across the globe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8499680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84996802021-10-12 Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians Wilson, Hannah C.P. Abrams, Sarah Simpkin Begin, Arabella Health Sci Rep Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Drexit (“Doctor‐Exit”) is the exponentially growing trend for junior doctors in the UK to walk away from their jobs in the National Health Service (NHS). Our objective was to identify the reasons why junior doctors in the UK leave their NHS training programs to train overseas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A simultaneous and convergent mixed‐methods study was performed to analyze both an online survey and semi‐structured interviews from junior doctors who had left the NHS. Social media, online professional media, and networks of junior doctors were used to recruit doctors. All were UK medical school graduates who had left the NHS within the last 15 years (2003‐2018). RESULTS: 96.1% (149/155) of respondents reported not being offered an exit interview on leaving the NHS. 94.8% (147/155) of respondents did not regret quitting the NHS. Participants were more satisfied with their pay and work life balance in their overseas posts when compared to training in the NHS (P < 0.05). Burnout was variably defined and was prominent in doctors who left 53.8% (113/210) but was reversed when they practiced medicine overseas in 89.2% (74/83) of cases. Qualitative data identified four key themes which were categorized into push factors, which were lack of interest in retention and bleak outlook; and pull factors, which were financial vs social capital and things are different overseas. CONCLUSION: Listening to the frontline junior doctors' voices lend insights into a better understanding of the push and pull factors that appear to be exacerbating the exodus of junior doctors from the NHS. Our results indicate that exit interviews should be performed routinely. There needs to be a shift to focus on the training of doctors rather than service provision, with efforts to support, appreciate, and value junior doctors. Further exploration is needed to identify what is happening in training programs overseas to improve retention within the NHS. Furthermore, identifying issues perceived by junior doctors in the UK in the context of workforce planning may be applicable to healthcare systems across the globe. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8499680/ /pubmed/34646946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.419 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wilson, Hannah C.P.
Abrams, Sarah
Simpkin Begin, Arabella
Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians
title Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians
title_full Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians
title_fullStr Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians
title_full_unstemmed Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians
title_short Drexit: Understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: An observational study of UK physicians
title_sort drexit: understanding why junior doctors leave their training programs to train overseas: an observational study of uk physicians
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.419
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonhannahcp drexitunderstandingwhyjuniordoctorsleavetheirtrainingprogramstotrainoverseasanobservationalstudyofukphysicians
AT abramssarah drexitunderstandingwhyjuniordoctorsleavetheirtrainingprogramstotrainoverseasanobservationalstudyofukphysicians
AT simpkinbeginarabella drexitunderstandingwhyjuniordoctorsleavetheirtrainingprogramstotrainoverseasanobservationalstudyofukphysicians