Cargando…

Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries

Priority setting represents an even bigger challenge during public health emergencies than routine times. This is because such emergencies compete with routine programmes for the available health resources, strain health systems and shift health-care attention and resources towards containing the sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapiriri, Lydia, Kiwanuka, Suzanne, Biemba, Godfrey, Velez, Claudia, Razavi, S Donya, Abelson, Julia, Essue, Beverley M, Danis, Marion, Goold, Susan, Noorulhuda, Mariam, Nouvet, Elysee, Sandman, Lars, Williams, Iestyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab113
_version_ 1784580380104327168
author Kapiriri, Lydia
Kiwanuka, Suzanne
Biemba, Godfrey
Velez, Claudia
Razavi, S Donya
Abelson, Julia
Essue, Beverley M
Danis, Marion
Goold, Susan
Noorulhuda, Mariam
Nouvet, Elysee
Sandman, Lars
Williams, Iestyn
author_facet Kapiriri, Lydia
Kiwanuka, Suzanne
Biemba, Godfrey
Velez, Claudia
Razavi, S Donya
Abelson, Julia
Essue, Beverley M
Danis, Marion
Goold, Susan
Noorulhuda, Mariam
Nouvet, Elysee
Sandman, Lars
Williams, Iestyn
author_sort Kapiriri, Lydia
collection PubMed
description Priority setting represents an even bigger challenge during public health emergencies than routine times. This is because such emergencies compete with routine programmes for the available health resources, strain health systems and shift health-care attention and resources towards containing the spread of the epidemic and treating those that fall seriously ill. This paper is part of a larger global study, the aim of which is to evaluate the degree to which national COVID-19 preparedness and response plans incorporated priority setting concepts. It provides important insights into what and how priority decisions were made in the context of a pandemic. Specifically, with a focus on a sample of 18 African countries’ pandemic plans, the paper aims to: (1) explore the degree to which the documented priority setting processes adhere to established quality indicators of effective priority setting and (2) examine if there is a relationship between the number of quality indicators present in the pandemic plans and the country’s economic context, health system and prior experiences with disease outbreaks. All the reviewed plans contained some aspects of expected priority setting processes but none of the national plans addressed all quality parameters. Most of the parameters were mentioned by less than 10 of the 18 country plans reviewed, and several plans identified one or two aspects of fair priority setting processes. Very few plans identified equity as a criterion for priority setting. Since the parameters are relevant to the quality of priority setting that is implemented during public health emergencies and most of the countries have pre-existing pandemic plans; it would be advisable that, for the future (if not already happening), countries consider priority setting as a critical part of their routine health emergency and disease outbreak plans. Such an approach would ensure that priority setting is integral to pandemic planning, response and recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8500007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85000072021-10-08 Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries Kapiriri, Lydia Kiwanuka, Suzanne Biemba, Godfrey Velez, Claudia Razavi, S Donya Abelson, Julia Essue, Beverley M Danis, Marion Goold, Susan Noorulhuda, Mariam Nouvet, Elysee Sandman, Lars Williams, Iestyn Health Policy Plan Original Article Priority setting represents an even bigger challenge during public health emergencies than routine times. This is because such emergencies compete with routine programmes for the available health resources, strain health systems and shift health-care attention and resources towards containing the spread of the epidemic and treating those that fall seriously ill. This paper is part of a larger global study, the aim of which is to evaluate the degree to which national COVID-19 preparedness and response plans incorporated priority setting concepts. It provides important insights into what and how priority decisions were made in the context of a pandemic. Specifically, with a focus on a sample of 18 African countries’ pandemic plans, the paper aims to: (1) explore the degree to which the documented priority setting processes adhere to established quality indicators of effective priority setting and (2) examine if there is a relationship between the number of quality indicators present in the pandemic plans and the country’s economic context, health system and prior experiences with disease outbreaks. All the reviewed plans contained some aspects of expected priority setting processes but none of the national plans addressed all quality parameters. Most of the parameters were mentioned by less than 10 of the 18 country plans reviewed, and several plans identified one or two aspects of fair priority setting processes. Very few plans identified equity as a criterion for priority setting. Since the parameters are relevant to the quality of priority setting that is implemented during public health emergencies and most of the countries have pre-existing pandemic plans; it would be advisable that, for the future (if not already happening), countries consider priority setting as a critical part of their routine health emergency and disease outbreak plans. Such an approach would ensure that priority setting is integral to pandemic planning, response and recovery. Oxford University Press 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8500007/ /pubmed/34545395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab113 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Kapiriri, Lydia
Kiwanuka, Suzanne
Biemba, Godfrey
Velez, Claudia
Razavi, S Donya
Abelson, Julia
Essue, Beverley M
Danis, Marion
Goold, Susan
Noorulhuda, Mariam
Nouvet, Elysee
Sandman, Lars
Williams, Iestyn
Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries
title Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries
title_full Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries
title_fullStr Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries
title_full_unstemmed Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries
title_short Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries
title_sort priority setting and equity in covid-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 african countries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab113
work_keys_str_mv AT kapiririlydia prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT kiwanukasuzanne prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT biembagodfrey prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT velezclaudia prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT razavisdonya prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT abelsonjulia prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT essuebeverleym prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT danismarion prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT gooldsusan prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT noorulhudamariam prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT nouvetelysee prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT sandmanlars prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries
AT williamsiestyn prioritysettingandequityincovid19pandemicplansacomparativeanalysisof18africancountries