Cargando…
COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
Objective: To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on ea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769 |
_version_ | 1784580408881446912 |
---|---|
author | Temsah, Mohamad-Hani Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim Al-Eyadhy, Ayman Al-Sohime, Fahad Al Huzaimi, Abdullah Alamro, Nurah Alhasan, Khalid Upadhye, Vaibhavi Jamal, Amr Aljamaan, Fadi Alhaboob, Ali Arabi, Yaseen M. Lazarovici, Marc Somily, Ali M. Boker, Abdulaziz M. |
author_facet | Temsah, Mohamad-Hani Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim Al-Eyadhy, Ayman Al-Sohime, Fahad Al Huzaimi, Abdullah Alamro, Nurah Alhasan, Khalid Upadhye, Vaibhavi Jamal, Amr Aljamaan, Fadi Alhaboob, Ali Arabi, Yaseen M. Lazarovici, Marc Somily, Ali M. Boker, Abdulaziz M. |
author_sort | Temsah, Mohamad-Hani |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on each center's debriefing reports from 30 countries in all WHO regions. The main outcome measures were the COVID-19 simulations characteristics, facilitators, obstacles, and challenges encountered during the simulation sessions. Results: Invitation was sent to 343 simulation team leaders and multidisciplinary HCWs who responded; 121 completed the survey. The frequency of simulation sessions was monthly (27.1%), weekly (24.8%), twice weekly (19.8%), or daily (21.5%). Regarding the themes of the simulation sessions, they were COVID-19 patient arrival to ER (69.4%), COVID-19 patient intubation due to respiratory failure (66.1%), COVID-19 patient requiring CPR (53.7%), COVID-19 transport inside the hospital (53.7%), COVID-19 elective intubation in OR (37.2%), or Delivery of COVID-19 mother and neonatal care (19%). Among participants, 55.6% reported the team's full engagement in the simulation sessions. The average session length was 30–60 min. The debriefing process was conducted by the ICU facilitator in (51%) of the sessions followed by simulation staff in 41% of the sessions. A total of 80% reported significant improvement in clinical preparedness after simulation sessions, and 70% were satisfied with the COVID-19 sessions. Most perceived issues reported were related to infection control measures, followed by team dynamics, logistics, and patient transport issues. Conclusion: Simulation centers team leaders and HCWs reported positive feedback on COVID-19 simulation sessions with multidisciplinary personnel involvement. These drills are a valuable tool for rehearsing safe dynamics on the frontline of COVID-19. More research on COVID-19 simulation outcomes is warranted; to explore variable factors for each country and healthcare system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8500233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85002332021-10-09 COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey Temsah, Mohamad-Hani Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim Al-Eyadhy, Ayman Al-Sohime, Fahad Al Huzaimi, Abdullah Alamro, Nurah Alhasan, Khalid Upadhye, Vaibhavi Jamal, Amr Aljamaan, Fadi Alhaboob, Ali Arabi, Yaseen M. Lazarovici, Marc Somily, Ali M. Boker, Abdulaziz M. Front Public Health Public Health Objective: To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on each center's debriefing reports from 30 countries in all WHO regions. The main outcome measures were the COVID-19 simulations characteristics, facilitators, obstacles, and challenges encountered during the simulation sessions. Results: Invitation was sent to 343 simulation team leaders and multidisciplinary HCWs who responded; 121 completed the survey. The frequency of simulation sessions was monthly (27.1%), weekly (24.8%), twice weekly (19.8%), or daily (21.5%). Regarding the themes of the simulation sessions, they were COVID-19 patient arrival to ER (69.4%), COVID-19 patient intubation due to respiratory failure (66.1%), COVID-19 patient requiring CPR (53.7%), COVID-19 transport inside the hospital (53.7%), COVID-19 elective intubation in OR (37.2%), or Delivery of COVID-19 mother and neonatal care (19%). Among participants, 55.6% reported the team's full engagement in the simulation sessions. The average session length was 30–60 min. The debriefing process was conducted by the ICU facilitator in (51%) of the sessions followed by simulation staff in 41% of the sessions. A total of 80% reported significant improvement in clinical preparedness after simulation sessions, and 70% were satisfied with the COVID-19 sessions. Most perceived issues reported were related to infection control measures, followed by team dynamics, logistics, and patient transport issues. Conclusion: Simulation centers team leaders and HCWs reported positive feedback on COVID-19 simulation sessions with multidisciplinary personnel involvement. These drills are a valuable tool for rehearsing safe dynamics on the frontline of COVID-19. More research on COVID-19 simulation outcomes is warranted; to explore variable factors for each country and healthcare system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8500233/ /pubmed/34631644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769 Text en Copyright © 2021 Temsah, Alrabiaah, Al-Eyadhy, Al-Sohime, Al Huzaimi, Alamro, Alhasan, Upadhye, Jamal, Aljamaan, Alhaboob, Arabi, Lazarovici, Somily and Boker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Temsah, Mohamad-Hani Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim Al-Eyadhy, Ayman Al-Sohime, Fahad Al Huzaimi, Abdullah Alamro, Nurah Alhasan, Khalid Upadhye, Vaibhavi Jamal, Amr Aljamaan, Fadi Alhaboob, Ali Arabi, Yaseen M. Lazarovici, Marc Somily, Ali M. Boker, Abdulaziz M. COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey |
title | COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full | COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_short | COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_sort | covid-19 critical care simulations: an international cross-sectional survey |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT temsahmohamadhani covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT alrabiaahabdulkarim covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT aleyadhyayman covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT alsohimefahad covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT alhuzaimiabdullah covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT alamronurah covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT alhasankhalid covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT upadhyevaibhavi covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT jamalamr covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT aljamaanfadi covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT alhaboobali covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT arabiyaseenm covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT lazarovicimarc covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT somilyalim covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey AT bokerabdulazizm covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey |