Cargando…

COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Objective: To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Temsah, Mohamad-Hani, Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim, Al-Eyadhy, Ayman, Al-Sohime, Fahad, Al Huzaimi, Abdullah, Alamro, Nurah, Alhasan, Khalid, Upadhye, Vaibhavi, Jamal, Amr, Aljamaan, Fadi, Alhaboob, Ali, Arabi, Yaseen M., Lazarovici, Marc, Somily, Ali M., Boker, Abdulaziz M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769
_version_ 1784580408881446912
author Temsah, Mohamad-Hani
Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim
Al-Eyadhy, Ayman
Al-Sohime, Fahad
Al Huzaimi, Abdullah
Alamro, Nurah
Alhasan, Khalid
Upadhye, Vaibhavi
Jamal, Amr
Aljamaan, Fadi
Alhaboob, Ali
Arabi, Yaseen M.
Lazarovici, Marc
Somily, Ali M.
Boker, Abdulaziz M.
author_facet Temsah, Mohamad-Hani
Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim
Al-Eyadhy, Ayman
Al-Sohime, Fahad
Al Huzaimi, Abdullah
Alamro, Nurah
Alhasan, Khalid
Upadhye, Vaibhavi
Jamal, Amr
Aljamaan, Fadi
Alhaboob, Ali
Arabi, Yaseen M.
Lazarovici, Marc
Somily, Ali M.
Boker, Abdulaziz M.
author_sort Temsah, Mohamad-Hani
collection PubMed
description Objective: To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on each center's debriefing reports from 30 countries in all WHO regions. The main outcome measures were the COVID-19 simulations characteristics, facilitators, obstacles, and challenges encountered during the simulation sessions. Results: Invitation was sent to 343 simulation team leaders and multidisciplinary HCWs who responded; 121 completed the survey. The frequency of simulation sessions was monthly (27.1%), weekly (24.8%), twice weekly (19.8%), or daily (21.5%). Regarding the themes of the simulation sessions, they were COVID-19 patient arrival to ER (69.4%), COVID-19 patient intubation due to respiratory failure (66.1%), COVID-19 patient requiring CPR (53.7%), COVID-19 transport inside the hospital (53.7%), COVID-19 elective intubation in OR (37.2%), or Delivery of COVID-19 mother and neonatal care (19%). Among participants, 55.6% reported the team's full engagement in the simulation sessions. The average session length was 30–60 min. The debriefing process was conducted by the ICU facilitator in (51%) of the sessions followed by simulation staff in 41% of the sessions. A total of 80% reported significant improvement in clinical preparedness after simulation sessions, and 70% were satisfied with the COVID-19 sessions. Most perceived issues reported were related to infection control measures, followed by team dynamics, logistics, and patient transport issues. Conclusion: Simulation centers team leaders and HCWs reported positive feedback on COVID-19 simulation sessions with multidisciplinary personnel involvement. These drills are a valuable tool for rehearsing safe dynamics on the frontline of COVID-19. More research on COVID-19 simulation outcomes is warranted; to explore variable factors for each country and healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8500233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85002332021-10-09 COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey Temsah, Mohamad-Hani Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim Al-Eyadhy, Ayman Al-Sohime, Fahad Al Huzaimi, Abdullah Alamro, Nurah Alhasan, Khalid Upadhye, Vaibhavi Jamal, Amr Aljamaan, Fadi Alhaboob, Ali Arabi, Yaseen M. Lazarovici, Marc Somily, Ali M. Boker, Abdulaziz M. Front Public Health Public Health Objective: To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on each center's debriefing reports from 30 countries in all WHO regions. The main outcome measures were the COVID-19 simulations characteristics, facilitators, obstacles, and challenges encountered during the simulation sessions. Results: Invitation was sent to 343 simulation team leaders and multidisciplinary HCWs who responded; 121 completed the survey. The frequency of simulation sessions was monthly (27.1%), weekly (24.8%), twice weekly (19.8%), or daily (21.5%). Regarding the themes of the simulation sessions, they were COVID-19 patient arrival to ER (69.4%), COVID-19 patient intubation due to respiratory failure (66.1%), COVID-19 patient requiring CPR (53.7%), COVID-19 transport inside the hospital (53.7%), COVID-19 elective intubation in OR (37.2%), or Delivery of COVID-19 mother and neonatal care (19%). Among participants, 55.6% reported the team's full engagement in the simulation sessions. The average session length was 30–60 min. The debriefing process was conducted by the ICU facilitator in (51%) of the sessions followed by simulation staff in 41% of the sessions. A total of 80% reported significant improvement in clinical preparedness after simulation sessions, and 70% were satisfied with the COVID-19 sessions. Most perceived issues reported were related to infection control measures, followed by team dynamics, logistics, and patient transport issues. Conclusion: Simulation centers team leaders and HCWs reported positive feedback on COVID-19 simulation sessions with multidisciplinary personnel involvement. These drills are a valuable tool for rehearsing safe dynamics on the frontline of COVID-19. More research on COVID-19 simulation outcomes is warranted; to explore variable factors for each country and healthcare system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8500233/ /pubmed/34631644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769 Text en Copyright © 2021 Temsah, Alrabiaah, Al-Eyadhy, Al-Sohime, Al Huzaimi, Alamro, Alhasan, Upadhye, Jamal, Aljamaan, Alhaboob, Arabi, Lazarovici, Somily and Boker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Temsah, Mohamad-Hani
Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim
Al-Eyadhy, Ayman
Al-Sohime, Fahad
Al Huzaimi, Abdullah
Alamro, Nurah
Alhasan, Khalid
Upadhye, Vaibhavi
Jamal, Amr
Aljamaan, Fadi
Alhaboob, Ali
Arabi, Yaseen M.
Lazarovici, Marc
Somily, Ali M.
Boker, Abdulaziz M.
COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
title COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
title_fullStr COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
title_short COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
title_sort covid-19 critical care simulations: an international cross-sectional survey
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769
work_keys_str_mv AT temsahmohamadhani covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT alrabiaahabdulkarim covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT aleyadhyayman covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT alsohimefahad covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT alhuzaimiabdullah covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT alamronurah covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT alhasankhalid covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT upadhyevaibhavi covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT jamalamr covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT aljamaanfadi covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT alhaboobali covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT arabiyaseenm covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT lazarovicimarc covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT somilyalim covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT bokerabdulazizm covid19criticalcaresimulationsaninternationalcrosssectionalsurvey