Cargando…

Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective

Background: Intraoperative crush smear is an adjuvant in diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) lesions on tissue sent for frozen section. Besides rapid decision-making, it also ensures that minimum injury is caused to the normal brain structures surrounding the intracranial neoplasm. A rapid intra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khonglah, Yookarin, Lyngdoh, Bifica Sofia, Kakati, Arindom, Mishra, Jaya, Al Aman, Mostafa Muhammad, Phukan, Pranjal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660033
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17823
_version_ 1784580412231647232
author Khonglah, Yookarin
Lyngdoh, Bifica Sofia
Kakati, Arindom
Mishra, Jaya
Al Aman, Mostafa Muhammad
Phukan, Pranjal
author_facet Khonglah, Yookarin
Lyngdoh, Bifica Sofia
Kakati, Arindom
Mishra, Jaya
Al Aman, Mostafa Muhammad
Phukan, Pranjal
author_sort Khonglah, Yookarin
collection PubMed
description Background: Intraoperative crush smear is an adjuvant in diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) lesions on tissue sent for frozen section. Besides rapid decision-making, it also ensures that minimum injury is caused to the normal brain structures surrounding the intracranial neoplasm. A rapid intraoperative diagnosis helps the surgeon in planning the appropriate surgery. Objective: Our objective is to review all the discordant cases between intraoperative and histopathological diagnosis and also to study the crush smear slides for morphological clues that could have been helpful in minimizing such errors, especially for an inexperienced neuropathologist/general pathologist. The surgeon’s perspective on the impact of these errors on management is also discussed. Method: A prospective study of six years from 2013 to 2019 was conducted. Crush smears were made and stained with rapid hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The rest of the tissue was processed for permanent tissue sections. Slides in which there was discordance between the intraoperative and permanent paraffin sections were reviewed to ascertain the reasons thereof. Results: A total of 81 specimens of CNS tumors were sent for intraoperative consultation. Out of these, discordance was seen in 13 (16%) cases. Conclusion: To minimize diagnostic errors, it is important to do regular analyses of the misinterpreted cases. Knowledge of the pre-operative radiological differential diagnosis is mandatory. Discussion with the surgeon regarding the clinical impact of the errors made will give a clearer picture to the pathologists regarding clinically relevant reporting during intraoperative consultation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8500248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85002482021-10-14 Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective Khonglah, Yookarin Lyngdoh, Bifica Sofia Kakati, Arindom Mishra, Jaya Al Aman, Mostafa Muhammad Phukan, Pranjal Cureus Pathology Background: Intraoperative crush smear is an adjuvant in diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) lesions on tissue sent for frozen section. Besides rapid decision-making, it also ensures that minimum injury is caused to the normal brain structures surrounding the intracranial neoplasm. A rapid intraoperative diagnosis helps the surgeon in planning the appropriate surgery. Objective: Our objective is to review all the discordant cases between intraoperative and histopathological diagnosis and also to study the crush smear slides for morphological clues that could have been helpful in minimizing such errors, especially for an inexperienced neuropathologist/general pathologist. The surgeon’s perspective on the impact of these errors on management is also discussed. Method: A prospective study of six years from 2013 to 2019 was conducted. Crush smears were made and stained with rapid hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The rest of the tissue was processed for permanent tissue sections. Slides in which there was discordance between the intraoperative and permanent paraffin sections were reviewed to ascertain the reasons thereof. Results: A total of 81 specimens of CNS tumors were sent for intraoperative consultation. Out of these, discordance was seen in 13 (16%) cases. Conclusion: To minimize diagnostic errors, it is important to do regular analyses of the misinterpreted cases. Knowledge of the pre-operative radiological differential diagnosis is mandatory. Discussion with the surgeon regarding the clinical impact of the errors made will give a clearer picture to the pathologists regarding clinically relevant reporting during intraoperative consultation. Cureus 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8500248/ /pubmed/34660033 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17823 Text en Copyright © 2021, Khonglah et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pathology
Khonglah, Yookarin
Lyngdoh, Bifica Sofia
Kakati, Arindom
Mishra, Jaya
Al Aman, Mostafa Muhammad
Phukan, Pranjal
Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective
title Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective
title_full Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective
title_fullStr Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective
title_short Intraoperative Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors: Challenges, Errors, Lessons Learned, and the Surgeon’s Perspective
title_sort intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: challenges, errors, lessons learned, and the surgeon’s perspective
topic Pathology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660033
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17823
work_keys_str_mv AT khonglahyookarin intraoperativediagnosisofcentralnervoussystemtumorschallengeserrorslessonslearnedandthesurgeonsperspective
AT lyngdohbificasofia intraoperativediagnosisofcentralnervoussystemtumorschallengeserrorslessonslearnedandthesurgeonsperspective
AT kakatiarindom intraoperativediagnosisofcentralnervoussystemtumorschallengeserrorslessonslearnedandthesurgeonsperspective
AT mishrajaya intraoperativediagnosisofcentralnervoussystemtumorschallengeserrorslessonslearnedandthesurgeonsperspective
AT alamanmostafamuhammad intraoperativediagnosisofcentralnervoussystemtumorschallengeserrorslessonslearnedandthesurgeonsperspective
AT phukanpranjal intraoperativediagnosisofcentralnervoussystemtumorschallengeserrorslessonslearnedandthesurgeonsperspective