Cargando…
A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis
BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disease with costly treatment, especially for high titer inhibitory patients. Emicizumab, a new humanized bispecific antibody, has been approved for use to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in HA patients with inhibit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027303 |
_version_ | 1784580493315932160 |
---|---|
author | Saiyarsarai, Parisa Robabpour Derakhshan, Atefeh Khedmati, Jamaleddin Eshghi, Peyman Seyedifar, Meysam |
author_facet | Saiyarsarai, Parisa Robabpour Derakhshan, Atefeh Khedmati, Jamaleddin Eshghi, Peyman Seyedifar, Meysam |
author_sort | Saiyarsarai, Parisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disease with costly treatment, especially for high titer inhibitory patients. Emicizumab, a new humanized bispecific antibody, has been approved for use to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in HA patients with inhibitors. This study evaluated the cost-utility of emicizumab prophylaxis (EP) in comparison with recombinant factor VII activated on-demand treatment in HA patients with inhibitors. METHODS: A life-time Markov model with payer and societal perspectives was developed in different age groups with different annual bleeding rates (ABR). Efficacy of treatments were extracted from HAVEN trials. Utilities were retrieved from published evidence. Costs were calculated based on Iran food and drug administration official website, national tariff book for medical services and hospital data. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: EP was dominant choice in comparison with on-demand administration of recombinant factor VII activated in all age groups with ABR 20 and 25, and it remained dominant in patients with age 2 and age 12 at start point with ABR 16 and 17. The reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the group with ABR 18 at the age 20, was 12,936 United States Dollars which is lower than the acceptable threshold of cost-effectiveness in Iran (1–3 gross domestic product per capita) and EP can be considered as cost-effective choice in this scenario. CONCLUSION: EP was found to be a dominant and cost-effective choice for Iranian HA patients with factor VIII inhibitors with ABR 18 and above with considerable cost saving. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8500655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85006552021-10-12 A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis Saiyarsarai, Parisa Robabpour Derakhshan, Atefeh Khedmati, Jamaleddin Eshghi, Peyman Seyedifar, Meysam Medicine (Baltimore) 4200 BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disease with costly treatment, especially for high titer inhibitory patients. Emicizumab, a new humanized bispecific antibody, has been approved for use to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in HA patients with inhibitors. This study evaluated the cost-utility of emicizumab prophylaxis (EP) in comparison with recombinant factor VII activated on-demand treatment in HA patients with inhibitors. METHODS: A life-time Markov model with payer and societal perspectives was developed in different age groups with different annual bleeding rates (ABR). Efficacy of treatments were extracted from HAVEN trials. Utilities were retrieved from published evidence. Costs were calculated based on Iran food and drug administration official website, national tariff book for medical services and hospital data. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: EP was dominant choice in comparison with on-demand administration of recombinant factor VII activated in all age groups with ABR 20 and 25, and it remained dominant in patients with age 2 and age 12 at start point with ABR 16 and 17. The reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the group with ABR 18 at the age 20, was 12,936 United States Dollars which is lower than the acceptable threshold of cost-effectiveness in Iran (1–3 gross domestic product per capita) and EP can be considered as cost-effective choice in this scenario. CONCLUSION: EP was found to be a dominant and cost-effective choice for Iranian HA patients with factor VIII inhibitors with ABR 18 and above with considerable cost saving. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8500655/ /pubmed/34622828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027303 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 4200 Saiyarsarai, Parisa Robabpour Derakhshan, Atefeh Khedmati, Jamaleddin Eshghi, Peyman Seyedifar, Meysam A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis |
title | A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis |
title_full | A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis |
title_fullStr | A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis |
title_short | A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost–utility analysis |
title_sort | comparison between on-demand usage of rfviia vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia a patients in iran: a cost–utility analysis |
topic | 4200 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saiyarsaraiparisa acomparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT robabpourderakhshanatefeh acomparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT khedmatijamaleddin acomparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT eshghipeyman acomparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT seyedifarmeysam acomparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT saiyarsaraiparisa comparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT robabpourderakhshanatefeh comparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT khedmatijamaleddin comparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT eshghipeyman comparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis AT seyedifarmeysam comparisonbetweenondemandusageofrfviiavsprophylaxisuseofemicizumabinhightiterinhibitoryhemophiliaapatientsiniranacostutilityanalysis |