Cargando…

A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens

Foodborne infections continue to plague Europe. Food safety monitoring is in crisis as the existing techniques for detecting pathogens do not keep up with the global rising of food production and consumption. Thus, the development of innovative techniques for detecting and identifying pathogenic bac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas, Halvatsiotis, Panagiotis, Houhoula, Dimitra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIMS Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2021019
_version_ 1784580519195836416
author Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas
Halvatsiotis, Panagiotis
Houhoula, Dimitra
author_facet Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas
Halvatsiotis, Panagiotis
Houhoula, Dimitra
author_sort Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas
collection PubMed
description Foodborne infections continue to plague Europe. Food safety monitoring is in crisis as the existing techniques for detecting pathogens do not keep up with the global rising of food production and consumption. Thus, the development of innovative techniques for detecting and identifying pathogenic bacteria has become critical. The aim of the present study was firstly to develop an innovative simple and low cost method of extracting bacterial DNA from contaminated food and water samples with Salmonella enteric(a) subsp. enteric(a) serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes and its comparison with two commercial DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, Macherey-Nagel). Finally, pathogens' detection using two molecular techniques (PCR-electrophoresis, LAMP), in order to evaluate the best combination of DNA extraction and identification based on their sensitivity, cost, rapidity and simplicity. Considering the above criteria, among them, best was proved an in-house bacterial DNA extraction method, based on the chloroform-isoamyl alcohol protocol, with certain modifications. This technique showed statistically similar results in terms of sensitivity, compared to the commercial kits, while at the same time maintained high rapidity and much lower cost. Lastly, between the molecular techniques, LAMP was found more promising considering its simplicity, high rapidity and sensitivity. Conclusively, the in-house DNA extraction method along with the LAMP technique, was proven to be the best among the presented combinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8500797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AIMS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85007972021-10-26 A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas Halvatsiotis, Panagiotis Houhoula, Dimitra AIMS Microbiol Research Article Foodborne infections continue to plague Europe. Food safety monitoring is in crisis as the existing techniques for detecting pathogens do not keep up with the global rising of food production and consumption. Thus, the development of innovative techniques for detecting and identifying pathogenic bacteria has become critical. The aim of the present study was firstly to develop an innovative simple and low cost method of extracting bacterial DNA from contaminated food and water samples with Salmonella enteric(a) subsp. enteric(a) serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes and its comparison with two commercial DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, Macherey-Nagel). Finally, pathogens' detection using two molecular techniques (PCR-electrophoresis, LAMP), in order to evaluate the best combination of DNA extraction and identification based on their sensitivity, cost, rapidity and simplicity. Considering the above criteria, among them, best was proved an in-house bacterial DNA extraction method, based on the chloroform-isoamyl alcohol protocol, with certain modifications. This technique showed statistically similar results in terms of sensitivity, compared to the commercial kits, while at the same time maintained high rapidity and much lower cost. Lastly, between the molecular techniques, LAMP was found more promising considering its simplicity, high rapidity and sensitivity. Conclusively, the in-house DNA extraction method along with the LAMP technique, was proven to be the best among the presented combinations. AIMS Press 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8500797/ /pubmed/34708174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2021019 Text en © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Research Article
Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas
Halvatsiotis, Panagiotis
Houhoula, Dimitra
A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens
title A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens
title_full A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens
title_fullStr A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens
title_short A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens
title_sort comparison of different dna extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2021019
work_keys_str_mv AT papatheodorouspyridonandreas acomparisonofdifferentdnaextractionmethodsandmoleculartechniquesforthedetectionandidentificationoffoodbornepathogens
AT halvatsiotispanagiotis acomparisonofdifferentdnaextractionmethodsandmoleculartechniquesforthedetectionandidentificationoffoodbornepathogens
AT houhouladimitra acomparisonofdifferentdnaextractionmethodsandmoleculartechniquesforthedetectionandidentificationoffoodbornepathogens
AT papatheodorouspyridonandreas comparisonofdifferentdnaextractionmethodsandmoleculartechniquesforthedetectionandidentificationoffoodbornepathogens
AT halvatsiotispanagiotis comparisonofdifferentdnaextractionmethodsandmoleculartechniquesforthedetectionandidentificationoffoodbornepathogens
AT houhouladimitra comparisonofdifferentdnaextractionmethodsandmoleculartechniquesforthedetectionandidentificationoffoodbornepathogens