Cargando…
Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey
The availability of intraoperative multimedia recording is increasing. Considering the growing call for physicians’ accountability, it is inevitable that multimedia will play an important role in aiding quality control by improving the adequacy of operative reporting. However, the perspectives of me...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00902-7 |
_version_ | 1784580537585762304 |
---|---|
author | van de Graaf, Floyd W. Eryigit, Özgür Lange, Johan F. |
author_facet | van de Graaf, Floyd W. Eryigit, Özgür Lange, Johan F. |
author_sort | van de Graaf, Floyd W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The availability of intraoperative multimedia recording is increasing. Considering the growing call for physicians’ accountability, it is inevitable that multimedia will play an important role in aiding quality control by improving the adequacy of operative reporting. However, the perspectives of medical professionals on this matter are poorly known. In this cross-disciplinary survey, we aimed to investigate the current viewpoints concerning the use of multimedia recording in the operating room. We conducted an electronic survey among all affiliated members of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands, the Dutch Urological Association and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology containing questions regarding current use of intraoperative recording and the level of likelihood or objection for certain scenarios. The response rate was 27.8%. The survey encompasses 370 (54.5%) surgeons, 71 (10.5%) urologists, 80 (11.8%) gynecologists, and 158 (23.3%) residents in training. 52.4% of respondents feel that the currently used operative report is insufficient for future quality requirements. 58.5% think it is unlikely they would behave differently during surgery when intra-operative video recording is applied. 82.8% think it is unlikely that their surgical methods would be altered. 63.8% of respondents preferred only video registration when intraoperative recording is implemented. The majority of respondents agree that the current method of operative reporting is insufficient for future quality requirements. There is support for intraoperative video recording, however, legal transparency is needed before either intraoperative video or audio recording could be implemented to protect not only the patients, but also the healthcare providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13304-020-00902-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8500875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85008752021-10-19 Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey van de Graaf, Floyd W. Eryigit, Özgür Lange, Johan F. Updates Surg Original Article The availability of intraoperative multimedia recording is increasing. Considering the growing call for physicians’ accountability, it is inevitable that multimedia will play an important role in aiding quality control by improving the adequacy of operative reporting. However, the perspectives of medical professionals on this matter are poorly known. In this cross-disciplinary survey, we aimed to investigate the current viewpoints concerning the use of multimedia recording in the operating room. We conducted an electronic survey among all affiliated members of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands, the Dutch Urological Association and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology containing questions regarding current use of intraoperative recording and the level of likelihood or objection for certain scenarios. The response rate was 27.8%. The survey encompasses 370 (54.5%) surgeons, 71 (10.5%) urologists, 80 (11.8%) gynecologists, and 158 (23.3%) residents in training. 52.4% of respondents feel that the currently used operative report is insufficient for future quality requirements. 58.5% think it is unlikely they would behave differently during surgery when intra-operative video recording is applied. 82.8% think it is unlikely that their surgical methods would be altered. 63.8% of respondents preferred only video registration when intraoperative recording is implemented. The majority of respondents agree that the current method of operative reporting is insufficient for future quality requirements. There is support for intraoperative video recording, however, legal transparency is needed before either intraoperative video or audio recording could be implemented to protect not only the patients, but also the healthcare providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13304-020-00902-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8500875/ /pubmed/33105017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00902-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article van de Graaf, Floyd W. Eryigit, Özgür Lange, Johan F. Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey |
title | Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey |
title_full | Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey |
title_fullStr | Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey |
title_short | Current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey |
title_sort | current perspectives on video and audio recording inside the surgical operating room: results of a cross-disciplinary survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00902-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandegraaffloydw currentperspectivesonvideoandaudiorecordinginsidethesurgicaloperatingroomresultsofacrossdisciplinarysurvey AT eryigitozgur currentperspectivesonvideoandaudiorecordinginsidethesurgicaloperatingroomresultsofacrossdisciplinarysurvey AT langejohanf currentperspectivesonvideoandaudiorecordinginsidethesurgicaloperatingroomresultsofacrossdisciplinarysurvey |