Cargando…
Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
No study has examined the differential value of arterial intima thickness in the subtypes of acute ischaemic stroke. This study aimed to assess whether intima thickness of carotid artery (CIT), radial artery (RIT) and dorsalis pedis artery (PIT) have an independent and additive value in differentiat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16884 |
_version_ | 1784580548059987968 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Suqin Zhang, Cheng Zhang, Yun Jia, Guoyong Zhang, Mei Xu, Mingjun |
author_facet | Jin, Suqin Zhang, Cheng Zhang, Yun Jia, Guoyong Zhang, Mei Xu, Mingjun |
author_sort | Jin, Suqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | No study has examined the differential value of arterial intima thickness in the subtypes of acute ischaemic stroke. This study aimed to assess whether intima thickness of carotid artery (CIT), radial artery (RIT) and dorsalis pedis artery (PIT) have an independent and additive value in differentiating ischaemic stroke subtypes due to large‐artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or small‐vessel occlusion (SVO). One hundred and sixty‐one patients with LAA and 79 patients with SVO were recruited. CIT, RIT and PIT were measured with a 24‐MHz ultrasound transducer. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differential values of the different parameters in the two subtypes. ROC curve analyses were plotted to compare the differential performance of different parameters and the combination model. Both RIT and PIT were substantially thicker in LAA than in SVO stroke patients. RIT and carotid intima‐media thickness had similar performances in differentiating stroke subtypes. Introduction of RIT to traditional atherosclerotic associated risk factors had a marginal satisfactory differential performance for LAA and SVO stroke patients (AUC 0.775). RIT is a promising parameter for LAA and SVO subgroup classification. The combination of RIT and traditional risk factors might be a promising tool for differentiating ischaemic stroke subgroups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8500956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85009562021-10-12 Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion Jin, Suqin Zhang, Cheng Zhang, Yun Jia, Guoyong Zhang, Mei Xu, Mingjun J Cell Mol Med Original Articles No study has examined the differential value of arterial intima thickness in the subtypes of acute ischaemic stroke. This study aimed to assess whether intima thickness of carotid artery (CIT), radial artery (RIT) and dorsalis pedis artery (PIT) have an independent and additive value in differentiating ischaemic stroke subtypes due to large‐artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or small‐vessel occlusion (SVO). One hundred and sixty‐one patients with LAA and 79 patients with SVO were recruited. CIT, RIT and PIT were measured with a 24‐MHz ultrasound transducer. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differential values of the different parameters in the two subtypes. ROC curve analyses were plotted to compare the differential performance of different parameters and the combination model. Both RIT and PIT were substantially thicker in LAA than in SVO stroke patients. RIT and carotid intima‐media thickness had similar performances in differentiating stroke subtypes. Introduction of RIT to traditional atherosclerotic associated risk factors had a marginal satisfactory differential performance for LAA and SVO stroke patients (AUC 0.775). RIT is a promising parameter for LAA and SVO subgroup classification. The combination of RIT and traditional risk factors might be a promising tool for differentiating ischaemic stroke subgroups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-29 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8500956/ /pubmed/34459107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16884 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Jin, Suqin Zhang, Cheng Zhang, Yun Jia, Guoyong Zhang, Mei Xu, Mingjun Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion |
title | Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion |
title_full | Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion |
title_fullStr | Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion |
title_short | Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion |
title_sort | differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinsuqin differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion AT zhangcheng differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion AT zhangyun differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion AT jiaguoyong differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion AT zhangmei differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion AT xumingjun differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion |