Cargando…

Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion

No study has examined the differential value of arterial intima thickness in the subtypes of acute ischaemic stroke. This study aimed to assess whether intima thickness of carotid artery (CIT), radial artery (RIT) and dorsalis pedis artery (PIT) have an independent and additive value in differentiat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Suqin, Zhang, Cheng, Zhang, Yun, Jia, Guoyong, Zhang, Mei, Xu, Mingjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16884
_version_ 1784580548059987968
author Jin, Suqin
Zhang, Cheng
Zhang, Yun
Jia, Guoyong
Zhang, Mei
Xu, Mingjun
author_facet Jin, Suqin
Zhang, Cheng
Zhang, Yun
Jia, Guoyong
Zhang, Mei
Xu, Mingjun
author_sort Jin, Suqin
collection PubMed
description No study has examined the differential value of arterial intima thickness in the subtypes of acute ischaemic stroke. This study aimed to assess whether intima thickness of carotid artery (CIT), radial artery (RIT) and dorsalis pedis artery (PIT) have an independent and additive value in differentiating ischaemic stroke subtypes due to large‐artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or small‐vessel occlusion (SVO). One hundred and sixty‐one patients with LAA and 79 patients with SVO were recruited. CIT, RIT and PIT were measured with a 24‐MHz ultrasound transducer. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differential values of the different parameters in the two subtypes. ROC curve analyses were plotted to compare the differential performance of different parameters and the combination model. Both RIT and PIT were substantially thicker in LAA than in SVO stroke patients. RIT and carotid intima‐media thickness had similar performances in differentiating stroke subtypes. Introduction of RIT to traditional atherosclerotic associated risk factors had a marginal satisfactory differential performance for LAA and SVO stroke patients (AUC 0.775). RIT is a promising parameter for LAA and SVO subgroup classification. The combination of RIT and traditional risk factors might be a promising tool for differentiating ischaemic stroke subgroups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8500956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85009562021-10-12 Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion Jin, Suqin Zhang, Cheng Zhang, Yun Jia, Guoyong Zhang, Mei Xu, Mingjun J Cell Mol Med Original Articles No study has examined the differential value of arterial intima thickness in the subtypes of acute ischaemic stroke. This study aimed to assess whether intima thickness of carotid artery (CIT), radial artery (RIT) and dorsalis pedis artery (PIT) have an independent and additive value in differentiating ischaemic stroke subtypes due to large‐artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or small‐vessel occlusion (SVO). One hundred and sixty‐one patients with LAA and 79 patients with SVO were recruited. CIT, RIT and PIT were measured with a 24‐MHz ultrasound transducer. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differential values of the different parameters in the two subtypes. ROC curve analyses were plotted to compare the differential performance of different parameters and the combination model. Both RIT and PIT were substantially thicker in LAA than in SVO stroke patients. RIT and carotid intima‐media thickness had similar performances in differentiating stroke subtypes. Introduction of RIT to traditional atherosclerotic associated risk factors had a marginal satisfactory differential performance for LAA and SVO stroke patients (AUC 0.775). RIT is a promising parameter for LAA and SVO subgroup classification. The combination of RIT and traditional risk factors might be a promising tool for differentiating ischaemic stroke subgroups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-29 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8500956/ /pubmed/34459107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16884 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jin, Suqin
Zhang, Cheng
Zhang, Yun
Jia, Guoyong
Zhang, Mei
Xu, Mingjun
Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
title Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
title_full Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
title_fullStr Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
title_short Differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
title_sort differential value of intima thickness in ischaemic stroke due to large‐artery atherosclerosis and small‐vessel occlusion
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16884
work_keys_str_mv AT jinsuqin differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion
AT zhangcheng differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion
AT zhangyun differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion
AT jiaguoyong differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion
AT zhangmei differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion
AT xumingjun differentialvalueofintimathicknessinischaemicstrokeduetolargearteryatherosclerosisandsmallvesselocclusion