Cargando…

Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control

Low fresh gas flow rates are recommended because of their benefits, however, its use is limited due to associated risks. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether 300 mL of fresh gas flow that practised with automated gas control mode is applicable and safe. The second aim is to show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colak, Yusuf Z., Toprak, Hüseyin I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99648-4
_version_ 1784580591398682624
author Colak, Yusuf Z.
Toprak, Hüseyin I.
author_facet Colak, Yusuf Z.
Toprak, Hüseyin I.
author_sort Colak, Yusuf Z.
collection PubMed
description Low fresh gas flow rates are recommended because of their benefits, however, its use is limited due to associated risks. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether 300 mL of fresh gas flow that practised with automated gas control mode is applicable and safe. The second aim is to show that automated mode can provide economic benefits. Sixty hepatectomy cases who suitable criterias were included to cohort study in three groups as prospective, sequential, observational. An operating room were allocated only for this study. 300 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA3), 600 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA6) and, 600 mL fresh gas flow with manually (groupM6) was applied. Patients’ respiratory, hemodynamic parameters (safety), number of setting changes, O(2) concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO(2):0.4 during the low flow anaesthesia (feasibility) and comsumption data of anaesthetic agent and CO(2) absorber (economical) were collected and compared. p < 0.05 was accepted as statistical significance level. No significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of demographic data and duration of operation. Safety datas (hemodynamic, respiratory, and tissue perfusion parameters) were within normal limits in all patients. O(2) concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO(2):0.4 was statistically higher in groupA3 (92%) than other groups (p < 0.001) but it was still within applicable limits (below the 100%). Number of setting changes was statistically higher in groupM6 than other groups (p < 0.001). The anaesthetic agent consumption was statistically less in groupA3 (p = 0.018). We performed fresh gas flow of 300 mL by automated mode without deviating from the safety limits and reduced the consumption of anaesthetic agent. We were able to maintain FiO(2):0.4 in hepatectomies without much setting changes, and we think that the automated mode is better in terms of ease of practise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8501136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85011362021-10-12 Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control Colak, Yusuf Z. Toprak, Hüseyin I. Sci Rep Article Low fresh gas flow rates are recommended because of their benefits, however, its use is limited due to associated risks. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether 300 mL of fresh gas flow that practised with automated gas control mode is applicable and safe. The second aim is to show that automated mode can provide economic benefits. Sixty hepatectomy cases who suitable criterias were included to cohort study in three groups as prospective, sequential, observational. An operating room were allocated only for this study. 300 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA3), 600 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA6) and, 600 mL fresh gas flow with manually (groupM6) was applied. Patients’ respiratory, hemodynamic parameters (safety), number of setting changes, O(2) concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO(2):0.4 during the low flow anaesthesia (feasibility) and comsumption data of anaesthetic agent and CO(2) absorber (economical) were collected and compared. p < 0.05 was accepted as statistical significance level. No significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of demographic data and duration of operation. Safety datas (hemodynamic, respiratory, and tissue perfusion parameters) were within normal limits in all patients. O(2) concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO(2):0.4 was statistically higher in groupA3 (92%) than other groups (p < 0.001) but it was still within applicable limits (below the 100%). Number of setting changes was statistically higher in groupM6 than other groups (p < 0.001). The anaesthetic agent consumption was statistically less in groupA3 (p = 0.018). We performed fresh gas flow of 300 mL by automated mode without deviating from the safety limits and reduced the consumption of anaesthetic agent. We were able to maintain FiO(2):0.4 in hepatectomies without much setting changes, and we think that the automated mode is better in terms of ease of practise. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8501136/ /pubmed/34625647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99648-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Colak, Yusuf Z.
Toprak, Hüseyin I.
Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_full Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_fullStr Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_short Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_sort feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by maquet flow-i equipped with automated gas control
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99648-4
work_keys_str_mv AT colakyusufz feasibilitysafetyandeconomicconsequencesofusingminimalflowanaesthesiabymaquetflowiequippedwithautomatedgascontrol
AT toprakhuseyini feasibilitysafetyandeconomicconsequencesofusingminimalflowanaesthesiabymaquetflowiequippedwithautomatedgascontrol