Cargando…

A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context

The most common reaction to suggesting that we could learn valuable lessons from the way the current pandemic has been/ is being handled, is to discourage the attempt; as it is suggested that it can all be done more accurately and authoritatively after the inevitable Public Inquiry (Slater, 2019). O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slater, David, Hollnagel, Erik, MacKinnon, Ralph, Sujan, Mark, Carson-Stevens, Andrew, Ross, Alistair, Bowie, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105525
_version_ 1784580611025928192
author Slater, David
Hollnagel, Erik
MacKinnon, Ralph
Sujan, Mark
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Ross, Alistair
Bowie, Paul
author_facet Slater, David
Hollnagel, Erik
MacKinnon, Ralph
Sujan, Mark
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Ross, Alistair
Bowie, Paul
author_sort Slater, David
collection PubMed
description The most common reaction to suggesting that we could learn valuable lessons from the way the current pandemic has been/ is being handled, is to discourage the attempt; as it is suggested that it can all be done more accurately and authoritatively after the inevitable Public Inquiry (Slater, 2019). On the other hand, a more constructive approach, is to capture and understand the work that was actually done.This would include normal activities, as well as positive adaptations to challenges and failures that may have occurred. Such an approach aimed at improving what worked, rather than blaming people for what went wrong, has the potential to contribute more successfully to controlling the consequences of the current crisis. Such an approach should thus be aimed at detecting and feeding back lessons from emerging and probably unexpected behaviours and helping to design the system to adapt better to counter the effects. The science and discipline of Human Factors (HF) promotes system resilience. This can be defined as an organisation's ability to adjust its functioning before, during or after significant disturbances (such as a pandemic), enabling adaptation and operation under both anticipated and unanticipated circumstances. A “functional” approach methodology enables the identification of where the system and its various interdependent functions (an activity or set of activities that are required to give a certain output), could be improved and strengthened; if not immediately, at least for the future. Along these lines, suggestions for adding key resilience functions are additionally identified and outlined. The application and insights gained from this functional approach to the 2015 MERS-Cov pandemic in South Korea has been seen as contributing substantially to the effective response to the current crisis in that country (Min, submitted for publication). In this paper, we present an overarching framework for a series of projects that are planned to carry out focussed systems-based analysis to generate learning from key aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8501230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85012302021-10-12 A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context Slater, David Hollnagel, Erik MacKinnon, Ralph Sujan, Mark Carson-Stevens, Andrew Ross, Alistair Bowie, Paul Saf Sci Article The most common reaction to suggesting that we could learn valuable lessons from the way the current pandemic has been/ is being handled, is to discourage the attempt; as it is suggested that it can all be done more accurately and authoritatively after the inevitable Public Inquiry (Slater, 2019). On the other hand, a more constructive approach, is to capture and understand the work that was actually done.This would include normal activities, as well as positive adaptations to challenges and failures that may have occurred. Such an approach aimed at improving what worked, rather than blaming people for what went wrong, has the potential to contribute more successfully to controlling the consequences of the current crisis. Such an approach should thus be aimed at detecting and feeding back lessons from emerging and probably unexpected behaviours and helping to design the system to adapt better to counter the effects. The science and discipline of Human Factors (HF) promotes system resilience. This can be defined as an organisation's ability to adjust its functioning before, during or after significant disturbances (such as a pandemic), enabling adaptation and operation under both anticipated and unanticipated circumstances. A “functional” approach methodology enables the identification of where the system and its various interdependent functions (an activity or set of activities that are required to give a certain output), could be improved and strengthened; if not immediately, at least for the future. Along these lines, suggestions for adding key resilience functions are additionally identified and outlined. The application and insights gained from this functional approach to the 2015 MERS-Cov pandemic in South Korea has been seen as contributing substantially to the effective response to the current crisis in that country (Min, submitted for publication). In this paper, we present an overarching framework for a series of projects that are planned to carry out focussed systems-based analysis to generate learning from key aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-02 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8501230/ /pubmed/34658531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105525 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Slater, David
Hollnagel, Erik
MacKinnon, Ralph
Sujan, Mark
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Ross, Alistair
Bowie, Paul
A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context
title A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context
title_full A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context
title_fullStr A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context
title_full_unstemmed A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context
title_short A systems analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic response in the United Kingdom – Part 1 – The overall context
title_sort systems analysis of the covid-19 pandemic response in the united kingdom – part 1 – the overall context
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105525
work_keys_str_mv AT slaterdavid asystemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT hollnagelerik asystemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT mackinnonralph asystemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT sujanmark asystemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT carsonstevensandrew asystemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT rossalistair asystemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT bowiepaul asystemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT slaterdavid systemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT hollnagelerik systemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT mackinnonralph systemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT sujanmark systemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT carsonstevensandrew systemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT rossalistair systemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext
AT bowiepaul systemsanalysisofthecovid19pandemicresponseintheunitedkingdompart1theoverallcontext