Cargando…

Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018

IMPORTANCE: Timely access to clinically appropriate obstetric services is critical to the provision of high-quality perinatal care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the geographic distribution, proximity, and urban adjacency of US obstetric hospitals by annual birth volume. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Handley, Sara C., Passarella, Molly, Herrick, Heidi M., Interrante, Julia D., Lorch, Scott A., Kozhimannil, Katy B., Phibbs, Ciaran S., Foglia, Elizabeth E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34623408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25373
_version_ 1784580674680782848
author Handley, Sara C.
Passarella, Molly
Herrick, Heidi M.
Interrante, Julia D.
Lorch, Scott A.
Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Phibbs, Ciaran S.
Foglia, Elizabeth E.
author_facet Handley, Sara C.
Passarella, Molly
Herrick, Heidi M.
Interrante, Julia D.
Lorch, Scott A.
Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Phibbs, Ciaran S.
Foglia, Elizabeth E.
author_sort Handley, Sara C.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Timely access to clinically appropriate obstetric services is critical to the provision of high-quality perinatal care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the geographic distribution, proximity, and urban adjacency of US obstetric hospitals by annual birth volume. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective population-based cohort study identified US hospitals with obstetric services using the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid provider of services data from 2010 to 2018. Obstetric hospitals with 10 or more births per year were included in the study. Data analysis was performed from November 6, 2020, to April 5, 2021. EXPOSURE: Hospital birth volume, defined by annual birth volume categories of 10 to 500, 501 to 1000, 1001 to 2000, and more than 2000 births. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes assessed by birth volume category were percentage of births (from annual AHA data), number of hospitals, geographic distribution of hospitals among states, proximity between obstetric hospitals, and urban adjacency defined by urban influence codes, which classify counties by population size and adjacency to a metropolitan area. RESULTS: The study included 26 900 hospital-years of data from 3207 distinct US hospitals with obstetric services, reflecting 34 054 951 associated births. Most infants (19 327 487 [56.8%]) were born in hospitals with more than 2000 births/y, and 2 528 259 (7.4%) were born in low-volume (10-500 births/y) hospitals. More than one-third of obstetric hospitals (37.4%; 10 064 hospital-years) were low volume. A total of 46 states had obstetric hospitals in all volume categories. Among low-volume hospitals, 18.9% (1904 hospital-years) were not within 30 miles of any other obstetric hospital and 23.9% (2400 hospital-years) were within 30 miles of a hospital with more than 2000 deliveries/y. Isolated hospitals (those without another obstetric hospital within 30 miles) were more frequently low volume, with 58.4% (1112 hospital-years) located in noncore rural areas. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, marked variations were found in birth volume, geographic distribution, proximity, and urban adjacency among US obstetric hospitals from 2010 to 2018. The findings related to geographic isolation and rural-urban distribution of low-volume obstetric hospitals suggest the need to balance proximity with volume to optimize effective referral and access to high-quality perinatal care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8501399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85013992021-10-22 Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018 Handley, Sara C. Passarella, Molly Herrick, Heidi M. Interrante, Julia D. Lorch, Scott A. Kozhimannil, Katy B. Phibbs, Ciaran S. Foglia, Elizabeth E. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Timely access to clinically appropriate obstetric services is critical to the provision of high-quality perinatal care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the geographic distribution, proximity, and urban adjacency of US obstetric hospitals by annual birth volume. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective population-based cohort study identified US hospitals with obstetric services using the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid provider of services data from 2010 to 2018. Obstetric hospitals with 10 or more births per year were included in the study. Data analysis was performed from November 6, 2020, to April 5, 2021. EXPOSURE: Hospital birth volume, defined by annual birth volume categories of 10 to 500, 501 to 1000, 1001 to 2000, and more than 2000 births. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes assessed by birth volume category were percentage of births (from annual AHA data), number of hospitals, geographic distribution of hospitals among states, proximity between obstetric hospitals, and urban adjacency defined by urban influence codes, which classify counties by population size and adjacency to a metropolitan area. RESULTS: The study included 26 900 hospital-years of data from 3207 distinct US hospitals with obstetric services, reflecting 34 054 951 associated births. Most infants (19 327 487 [56.8%]) were born in hospitals with more than 2000 births/y, and 2 528 259 (7.4%) were born in low-volume (10-500 births/y) hospitals. More than one-third of obstetric hospitals (37.4%; 10 064 hospital-years) were low volume. A total of 46 states had obstetric hospitals in all volume categories. Among low-volume hospitals, 18.9% (1904 hospital-years) were not within 30 miles of any other obstetric hospital and 23.9% (2400 hospital-years) were within 30 miles of a hospital with more than 2000 deliveries/y. Isolated hospitals (those without another obstetric hospital within 30 miles) were more frequently low volume, with 58.4% (1112 hospital-years) located in noncore rural areas. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, marked variations were found in birth volume, geographic distribution, proximity, and urban adjacency among US obstetric hospitals from 2010 to 2018. The findings related to geographic isolation and rural-urban distribution of low-volume obstetric hospitals suggest the need to balance proximity with volume to optimize effective referral and access to high-quality perinatal care. American Medical Association 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8501399/ /pubmed/34623408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25373 Text en Copyright 2021 Handley SC et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Handley, Sara C.
Passarella, Molly
Herrick, Heidi M.
Interrante, Julia D.
Lorch, Scott A.
Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Phibbs, Ciaran S.
Foglia, Elizabeth E.
Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018
title Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018
title_full Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018
title_fullStr Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018
title_short Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018
title_sort birth volume and geographic distribution of us hospitals with obstetric services from 2010 to 2018
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34623408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25373
work_keys_str_mv AT handleysarac birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018
AT passarellamolly birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018
AT herrickheidim birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018
AT interrantejuliad birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018
AT lorchscotta birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018
AT kozhimannilkatyb birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018
AT phibbsciarans birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018
AT fogliaelizabethe birthvolumeandgeographicdistributionofushospitalswithobstetricservicesfrom2010to2018