Cargando…
Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study
BACKGROUND: Fetal growth velocity standards have yet to be established for the Chinese population. This study aimed to establish such standards suitable for the Chinese population. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, population–based longitudinal cohort study including 9075 low–risk singleton pregn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04149-x |
_version_ | 1784580738935422976 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Tianchen Gong, Xiaoli Zhao, Yangyu Zhang, Lizhen You, Yiping Wei, Hongwei Zuo, Xifang Zhou, Ying Xing, Xinli Meng, Zhaoyan Lv, Qi Liu, Zhaodong Zhang, Jian Hu, Liyan Li, Junnan Li, Li Chen, Chulin Liu, Chunyan Sun, Guoqiang Liu, Aiju Chen, Jingsi Lv, Yuan Wang, Xiaoli Wei, Yuan |
author_facet | Wu, Tianchen Gong, Xiaoli Zhao, Yangyu Zhang, Lizhen You, Yiping Wei, Hongwei Zuo, Xifang Zhou, Ying Xing, Xinli Meng, Zhaoyan Lv, Qi Liu, Zhaodong Zhang, Jian Hu, Liyan Li, Junnan Li, Li Chen, Chulin Liu, Chunyan Sun, Guoqiang Liu, Aiju Chen, Jingsi Lv, Yuan Wang, Xiaoli Wei, Yuan |
author_sort | Wu, Tianchen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fetal growth velocity standards have yet to be established for the Chinese population. This study aimed to establish such standards suitable for the Chinese population. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, population–based longitudinal cohort study including 9075 low–risk singleton pregnant women. Data were collected from the clinical records of 24 hospitals in 18 provinces of China. Demographic characteristics, reproductive history, fetal ultrasound measurements, and perinatal outcome data were collected. The fetal ultrasound measurements included biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), head circumference (HC), and femur diaphysis length (FDL). We used linear mixed models with cubic splines to model the trajectory of four ultrasound parameters and estimate fetal weight. Fetal growth velocity was determined by calculating the first derivative of fetal size curves. We also used logistic regression to estimate the association between fetal growth velocities in the bottom 10th percentile and adverse perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: Fetal growth velocity was not consistent over time or among individuals. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) steadily increased beginning at 12 gestational weeks and peaked at 35 gestational weeks. The maximum velocity was 211.71 g/week, and there was a steady decrease in velocity from 35 to 40 gestational weeks. The four ultrasound measurements increased in the early second trimester; BPD and HC peaked at 13 gestational weeks, AC at 14 gestational weeks, and FDL at 15 gestational weeks. BPD and HC also increased from 19 to 24 and 19 to 21 gestational weeks, respectively. EFW velocity in the bottom 10th percentile indicated higher risks of neonatal complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79–2.78) and preterm birth < 37 weeks (OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 2.64–5.14). Sensitivity analyses showed that EFW velocity in the bottom 10th percentile was significantly associated with more adverse pregnancy outcomes for appropriate–for–gestational age neonates. CONCLUSIONS: We established fetal growth velocity curves for the Chinese population based on real–world clinical data. Our findings demonstrated that Chinese fetal growth patterns are somewhat different from those of other populations. Fetal growth velocity could provide more information to understand the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, especially for appropriate–for–gestational age neonates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04149-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8501691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85016912021-10-20 Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study Wu, Tianchen Gong, Xiaoli Zhao, Yangyu Zhang, Lizhen You, Yiping Wei, Hongwei Zuo, Xifang Zhou, Ying Xing, Xinli Meng, Zhaoyan Lv, Qi Liu, Zhaodong Zhang, Jian Hu, Liyan Li, Junnan Li, Li Chen, Chulin Liu, Chunyan Sun, Guoqiang Liu, Aiju Chen, Jingsi Lv, Yuan Wang, Xiaoli Wei, Yuan BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Fetal growth velocity standards have yet to be established for the Chinese population. This study aimed to establish such standards suitable for the Chinese population. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, population–based longitudinal cohort study including 9075 low–risk singleton pregnant women. Data were collected from the clinical records of 24 hospitals in 18 provinces of China. Demographic characteristics, reproductive history, fetal ultrasound measurements, and perinatal outcome data were collected. The fetal ultrasound measurements included biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), head circumference (HC), and femur diaphysis length (FDL). We used linear mixed models with cubic splines to model the trajectory of four ultrasound parameters and estimate fetal weight. Fetal growth velocity was determined by calculating the first derivative of fetal size curves. We also used logistic regression to estimate the association between fetal growth velocities in the bottom 10th percentile and adverse perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: Fetal growth velocity was not consistent over time or among individuals. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) steadily increased beginning at 12 gestational weeks and peaked at 35 gestational weeks. The maximum velocity was 211.71 g/week, and there was a steady decrease in velocity from 35 to 40 gestational weeks. The four ultrasound measurements increased in the early second trimester; BPD and HC peaked at 13 gestational weeks, AC at 14 gestational weeks, and FDL at 15 gestational weeks. BPD and HC also increased from 19 to 24 and 19 to 21 gestational weeks, respectively. EFW velocity in the bottom 10th percentile indicated higher risks of neonatal complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79–2.78) and preterm birth < 37 weeks (OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 2.64–5.14). Sensitivity analyses showed that EFW velocity in the bottom 10th percentile was significantly associated with more adverse pregnancy outcomes for appropriate–for–gestational age neonates. CONCLUSIONS: We established fetal growth velocity curves for the Chinese population based on real–world clinical data. Our findings demonstrated that Chinese fetal growth patterns are somewhat different from those of other populations. Fetal growth velocity could provide more information to understand the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, especially for appropriate–for–gestational age neonates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04149-x. BioMed Central 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8501691/ /pubmed/34627184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04149-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wu, Tianchen Gong, Xiaoli Zhao, Yangyu Zhang, Lizhen You, Yiping Wei, Hongwei Zuo, Xifang Zhou, Ying Xing, Xinli Meng, Zhaoyan Lv, Qi Liu, Zhaodong Zhang, Jian Hu, Liyan Li, Junnan Li, Li Chen, Chulin Liu, Chunyan Sun, Guoqiang Liu, Aiju Chen, Jingsi Lv, Yuan Wang, Xiaoli Wei, Yuan Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study |
title | Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study |
title_full | Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study |
title_fullStr | Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study |
title_short | Fetal growth velocity references from a Chinese population–based fetal growth study |
title_sort | fetal growth velocity references from a chinese population–based fetal growth study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04149-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wutianchen fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT gongxiaoli fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT zhaoyangyu fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT zhanglizhen fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT youyiping fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT weihongwei fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT zuoxifang fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT zhouying fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT xingxinli fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT mengzhaoyan fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT lvqi fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT liuzhaodong fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT zhangjian fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT huliyan fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT lijunnan fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT lili fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT chenchulin fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT liuchunyan fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT sunguoqiang fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT liuaiju fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT chenjingsi fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT lvyuan fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT wangxiaoli fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy AT weiyuan fetalgrowthvelocityreferencesfromachinesepopulationbasedfetalgrowthstudy |