Cargando…

The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery

BACKGROUND: The lower instrumented vertebrae (LIVs) in cervical deformity (CD) constructs may have varying effects on patient outcomes that are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare outcomes in CD patients undergoing instrumented correction according to the rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Passias, Peter Gust, Alas, Haddy, Pierce, Katherine E., Galetta, Matthew, Krol, Oscar, Passfall, Lara, Kummer, Nicholas, Naessig, Sara, Ahmad, Waleed, Diebo, Bassel G., Lafage, Renaud, Lafage, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728999
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_23_21
_version_ 1784580757794062336
author Passias, Peter Gust
Alas, Haddy
Pierce, Katherine E.
Galetta, Matthew
Krol, Oscar
Passfall, Lara
Kummer, Nicholas
Naessig, Sara
Ahmad, Waleed
Diebo, Bassel G.
Lafage, Renaud
Lafage, Virginie
author_facet Passias, Peter Gust
Alas, Haddy
Pierce, Katherine E.
Galetta, Matthew
Krol, Oscar
Passfall, Lara
Kummer, Nicholas
Naessig, Sara
Ahmad, Waleed
Diebo, Bassel G.
Lafage, Renaud
Lafage, Virginie
author_sort Passias, Peter Gust
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The lower instrumented vertebrae (LIVs) in cervical deformity (CD) constructs may have varying effects on patient outcomes that are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare outcomes in CD patients undergoing instrumented correction according to the relation of LIV with primary driver (PD). METHODS: Patients who met radiographic criteria for CD were included in the study. Patients were stratified by PD of deformity: cervical (C) through AMES classification (TS-CL >20 or cervical sagittal vertical axis >40) and thoracic (T) through hyper/hypokyphosis (TK) from T4-T12 (60 < TK < 40). Patients were further stratified by LIV in relation to curve apex (above/below). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified group differences in postoperative health-related quality-of-life and distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) (>10° LIV and LIV + 2) rate up to 1 year. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were analyzed. Twenty-one patients had a C-PD and 41 had a T-PD by definition. 100% of C-PDs had LIVs below CL apex, while 9.2% of T-PDs had LIVs below (caudal) to TK apex and 90.8% had LIVs above TK apex. By 1 year, C patients trended lower Neck Disability Index (NDI) (21.9 vs. 29.0, P = 0.245), lower numeric rating scales neck pain (4.2 vs. 5.1, P = 0.358), and significantly higher EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire Visual Analog Scale (69.2 vs. 52.4, P = 0.040). When T patients with LIVs below TK apex were excluded, remaining T patients with LIV above apex had significantly higher 1-year NDI than C patients (37.5 vs. 21.9, P = .05). T patients also trended higher rates of postoperative DJK than C (19.5% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.119). CONCLUSIONS: Stopping before apex was more common in patients with a primary thoracic driver (T) and associated with deleterious effects. Primary cervical driver (C) tended to have LIVs inclusive of CL apex with lower rates of DJK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8501812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85018122021-11-01 The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery Passias, Peter Gust Alas, Haddy Pierce, Katherine E. Galetta, Matthew Krol, Oscar Passfall, Lara Kummer, Nicholas Naessig, Sara Ahmad, Waleed Diebo, Bassel G. Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Virginie J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: The lower instrumented vertebrae (LIVs) in cervical deformity (CD) constructs may have varying effects on patient outcomes that are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare outcomes in CD patients undergoing instrumented correction according to the relation of LIV with primary driver (PD). METHODS: Patients who met radiographic criteria for CD were included in the study. Patients were stratified by PD of deformity: cervical (C) through AMES classification (TS-CL >20 or cervical sagittal vertical axis >40) and thoracic (T) through hyper/hypokyphosis (TK) from T4-T12 (60 < TK < 40). Patients were further stratified by LIV in relation to curve apex (above/below). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified group differences in postoperative health-related quality-of-life and distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) (>10° LIV and LIV + 2) rate up to 1 year. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were analyzed. Twenty-one patients had a C-PD and 41 had a T-PD by definition. 100% of C-PDs had LIVs below CL apex, while 9.2% of T-PDs had LIVs below (caudal) to TK apex and 90.8% had LIVs above TK apex. By 1 year, C patients trended lower Neck Disability Index (NDI) (21.9 vs. 29.0, P = 0.245), lower numeric rating scales neck pain (4.2 vs. 5.1, P = 0.358), and significantly higher EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire Visual Analog Scale (69.2 vs. 52.4, P = 0.040). When T patients with LIVs below TK apex were excluded, remaining T patients with LIV above apex had significantly higher 1-year NDI than C patients (37.5 vs. 21.9, P = .05). T patients also trended higher rates of postoperative DJK than C (19.5% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.119). CONCLUSIONS: Stopping before apex was more common in patients with a primary thoracic driver (T) and associated with deleterious effects. Primary cervical driver (C) tended to have LIVs inclusive of CL apex with lower rates of DJK. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8501812/ /pubmed/34728999 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_23_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Passias, Peter Gust
Alas, Haddy
Pierce, Katherine E.
Galetta, Matthew
Krol, Oscar
Passfall, Lara
Kummer, Nicholas
Naessig, Sara
Ahmad, Waleed
Diebo, Bassel G.
Lafage, Renaud
Lafage, Virginie
The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery
title The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery
title_full The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery
title_fullStr The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery
title_short The impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery
title_sort impact of the lower instrumented level on outcomes in cervical deformity surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728999
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_23_21
work_keys_str_mv AT passiaspetergust theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT alashaddy theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT piercekatherinee theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT galettamatthew theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT kroloscar theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT passfalllara theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT kummernicholas theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT naessigsara theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT ahmadwaleed theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT diebobasselg theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT lafagerenaud theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT lafagevirginie theimpactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT passiaspetergust impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT alashaddy impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT piercekatherinee impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT galettamatthew impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT kroloscar impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT passfalllara impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT kummernicholas impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT naessigsara impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT ahmadwaleed impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT diebobasselg impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT lafagerenaud impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery
AT lafagevirginie impactofthelowerinstrumentedlevelonoutcomesincervicaldeformitysurgery