Cargando…

Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients

BACKGROUND: To optimize quality of life in patients with cervical deformity (CD), there may be alignment targets to be prioritized. OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: CD patients (C2–C7 Cobb >10(°)°, C2–C7 lordosis [CL] >10(°)°, cSVA >...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierce, Katherine E., Passias, Peter Gust, Brown, Avery E., Bortz, Cole A., Alas, Haddy, Lafage, Renaud, Krol, Oscar, Chou, Dean, Burton, Douglas C., Line, Breton, Klineberg, Eric, Hart, Robert, Gum, Jeffrey, Daniels, Alan, Hamilton, Kojo, Bess, Shay, Protopsaltis, Themistocles, Shaffrey, Christopher, Schwab, Frank A., Smith, Justin S., Lafage, Virginie, Ames, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34729000
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_26_21
_version_ 1784580758288990208
author Pierce, Katherine E.
Passias, Peter Gust
Brown, Avery E.
Bortz, Cole A.
Alas, Haddy
Lafage, Renaud
Krol, Oscar
Chou, Dean
Burton, Douglas C.
Line, Breton
Klineberg, Eric
Hart, Robert
Gum, Jeffrey
Daniels, Alan
Hamilton, Kojo
Bess, Shay
Protopsaltis, Themistocles
Shaffrey, Christopher
Schwab, Frank A.
Smith, Justin S.
Lafage, Virginie
Ames, Christopher
author_facet Pierce, Katherine E.
Passias, Peter Gust
Brown, Avery E.
Bortz, Cole A.
Alas, Haddy
Lafage, Renaud
Krol, Oscar
Chou, Dean
Burton, Douglas C.
Line, Breton
Klineberg, Eric
Hart, Robert
Gum, Jeffrey
Daniels, Alan
Hamilton, Kojo
Bess, Shay
Protopsaltis, Themistocles
Shaffrey, Christopher
Schwab, Frank A.
Smith, Justin S.
Lafage, Virginie
Ames, Christopher
author_sort Pierce, Katherine E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To optimize quality of life in patients with cervical deformity (CD), there may be alignment targets to be prioritized. OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: CD patients (C2–C7 Cobb >10(°)°, C2–C7 lordosis [CL] >10(°)°, cSVA > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle >25(°)°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical (C) or cervicothoracic (CT) Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (<4 cm) and T1 slope minus CL (TS-CL) (<15(°)°) were excluded. Patients assessed: Meeting Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for NDI (<−15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by Primary Ames Driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cut-offs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CD patients (62.1 years, 64%F, 28.8 kg/m(2)). 41.6% met MCID for NDI. A backward linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R(2)= 0.820 (P = 0.032) included TS-CL, cSVA, MGS, C2SS, C2-T3 angle, C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), CL. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the two groups (P > 0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cut-offs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥42.5(°) C2-T3 angle, >35.4(°) CL, <−31.76(°) C2 slope, <−11.57 mm cSVA, <−2.16(°) MGS, >−30.8 mm C2-T3 SVA, and ≤−33.6(°) TS-CL. CONCLUSIONS: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8501814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85018142021-11-01 Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients Pierce, Katherine E. Passias, Peter Gust Brown, Avery E. Bortz, Cole A. Alas, Haddy Lafage, Renaud Krol, Oscar Chou, Dean Burton, Douglas C. Line, Breton Klineberg, Eric Hart, Robert Gum, Jeffrey Daniels, Alan Hamilton, Kojo Bess, Shay Protopsaltis, Themistocles Shaffrey, Christopher Schwab, Frank A. Smith, Justin S. Lafage, Virginie Ames, Christopher J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: To optimize quality of life in patients with cervical deformity (CD), there may be alignment targets to be prioritized. OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: CD patients (C2–C7 Cobb >10(°)°, C2–C7 lordosis [CL] >10(°)°, cSVA > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle >25(°)°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical (C) or cervicothoracic (CT) Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (<4 cm) and T1 slope minus CL (TS-CL) (<15(°)°) were excluded. Patients assessed: Meeting Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for NDI (<−15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by Primary Ames Driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cut-offs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CD patients (62.1 years, 64%F, 28.8 kg/m(2)). 41.6% met MCID for NDI. A backward linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R(2)= 0.820 (P = 0.032) included TS-CL, cSVA, MGS, C2SS, C2-T3 angle, C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), CL. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the two groups (P > 0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cut-offs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥42.5(°) C2-T3 angle, >35.4(°) CL, <−31.76(°) C2 slope, <−11.57 mm cSVA, <−2.16(°) MGS, >−30.8 mm C2-T3 SVA, and ≤−33.6(°) TS-CL. CONCLUSIONS: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8501814/ /pubmed/34729000 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_26_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pierce, Katherine E.
Passias, Peter Gust
Brown, Avery E.
Bortz, Cole A.
Alas, Haddy
Lafage, Renaud
Krol, Oscar
Chou, Dean
Burton, Douglas C.
Line, Breton
Klineberg, Eric
Hart, Robert
Gum, Jeffrey
Daniels, Alan
Hamilton, Kojo
Bess, Shay
Protopsaltis, Themistocles
Shaffrey, Christopher
Schwab, Frank A.
Smith, Justin S.
Lafage, Virginie
Ames, Christopher
Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients
title Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients
title_full Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients
title_fullStr Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients
title_short Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients
title_sort prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34729000
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_26_21
work_keys_str_mv AT piercekatherinee prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT passiaspetergust prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT brownaverye prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT bortzcolea prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT alashaddy prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT lafagerenaud prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT kroloscar prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT choudean prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT burtondouglasc prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT linebreton prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT klinebergeric prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT hartrobert prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT gumjeffrey prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT danielsalan prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT hamiltonkojo prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT bessshay prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT protopsaltisthemistocles prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT shaffreychristopher prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT schwabfranka prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT smithjustins prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT lafagevirginie prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT ameschristopher prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients
AT prioritizationofrealignmentassociatedwithsuperiorclinicaloutcomesforsurgicalcervicaldeformitypatients