Cargando…

Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The orthodontic spring materials in use have a significant influence on the applied forces. The prerequisite to identify the in vitro< force deflection of the CAD/CAM fabricated springs is considered mandatory to identify the material characteristics. The purpose of the present invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ströbele, Dragan, Othman, Ahmed, Alevizakos, Vasilios, Turan, Mesut, von See, Constantin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57908
_version_ 1784580764514385920
author Ströbele, Dragan
Othman, Ahmed
Alevizakos, Vasilios
Turan, Mesut
von See, Constantin
author_facet Ströbele, Dragan
Othman, Ahmed
Alevizakos, Vasilios
Turan, Mesut
von See, Constantin
author_sort Ströbele, Dragan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The orthodontic spring materials in use have a significant influence on the applied forces. The prerequisite to identify the in vitro< force deflection of the CAD/CAM fabricated springs is considered mandatory to identify the material characteristics. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the mechanical load on 3D printed springs using different coil heights. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The springs were digitally designed with different coil heights using Autodesk Netfabb CAD software (San Rafael, CA, USA). Test specimens were manufactured using 3D printable experimental flexible material (Code: BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided according to the coil height into five groups, group A (n=4mm), group B (n=6mm), group C (n=8mm), group D (n=10mm) and group E (n=12mm). All group specimens were mechanically tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using K-S-Test to compare the values of each to the control group (p< 0.001). RESULTS: The highest value in all groups was achieved by 5.43 N/mm in group A, while the lowest value was achieved by 0.11 N/mm in group E. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed springs are mechanically affected by the coil heights and there is a direct correlation to the resulting force. Furthermore, the variations within the investigated groups must be thoroughly investigated prior to clinical application. Key words:CAD/CAM, 3D printing, Orthodontics, mechanical testing, material evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8501863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85018632021-10-18 Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study Ströbele, Dragan Othman, Ahmed Alevizakos, Vasilios Turan, Mesut von See, Constantin J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The orthodontic spring materials in use have a significant influence on the applied forces. The prerequisite to identify the in vitro< force deflection of the CAD/CAM fabricated springs is considered mandatory to identify the material characteristics. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the mechanical load on 3D printed springs using different coil heights. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The springs were digitally designed with different coil heights using Autodesk Netfabb CAD software (San Rafael, CA, USA). Test specimens were manufactured using 3D printable experimental flexible material (Code: BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided according to the coil height into five groups, group A (n=4mm), group B (n=6mm), group C (n=8mm), group D (n=10mm) and group E (n=12mm). All group specimens were mechanically tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using K-S-Test to compare the values of each to the control group (p< 0.001). RESULTS: The highest value in all groups was achieved by 5.43 N/mm in group A, while the lowest value was achieved by 0.11 N/mm in group E. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed springs are mechanically affected by the coil heights and there is a direct correlation to the resulting force. Furthermore, the variations within the investigated groups must be thoroughly investigated prior to clinical application. Key words:CAD/CAM, 3D printing, Orthodontics, mechanical testing, material evaluation. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8501863/ /pubmed/34667491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57908 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ströbele, Dragan
Othman, Ahmed
Alevizakos, Vasilios
Turan, Mesut
von See, Constantin
Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
title Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
title_full Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
title_fullStr Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
title_short Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
title_sort mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57908
work_keys_str_mv AT strobeledragan mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy
AT othmanahmed mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy
AT alevizakosvasilios mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy
AT turanmesut mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy
AT vonseeconstantin mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy