Cargando…
Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study
BACKGROUND: The orthodontic spring materials in use have a significant influence on the applied forces. The prerequisite to identify the in vitro< force deflection of the CAD/CAM fabricated springs is considered mandatory to identify the material characteristics. The purpose of the present invest...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57908 |
_version_ | 1784580764514385920 |
---|---|
author | Ströbele, Dragan Othman, Ahmed Alevizakos, Vasilios Turan, Mesut von See, Constantin |
author_facet | Ströbele, Dragan Othman, Ahmed Alevizakos, Vasilios Turan, Mesut von See, Constantin |
author_sort | Ströbele, Dragan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The orthodontic spring materials in use have a significant influence on the applied forces. The prerequisite to identify the in vitro< force deflection of the CAD/CAM fabricated springs is considered mandatory to identify the material characteristics. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the mechanical load on 3D printed springs using different coil heights. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The springs were digitally designed with different coil heights using Autodesk Netfabb CAD software (San Rafael, CA, USA). Test specimens were manufactured using 3D printable experimental flexible material (Code: BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided according to the coil height into five groups, group A (n=4mm), group B (n=6mm), group C (n=8mm), group D (n=10mm) and group E (n=12mm). All group specimens were mechanically tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using K-S-Test to compare the values of each to the control group (p< 0.001). RESULTS: The highest value in all groups was achieved by 5.43 N/mm in group A, while the lowest value was achieved by 0.11 N/mm in group E. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed springs are mechanically affected by the coil heights and there is a direct correlation to the resulting force. Furthermore, the variations within the investigated groups must be thoroughly investigated prior to clinical application. Key words:CAD/CAM, 3D printing, Orthodontics, mechanical testing, material evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8501863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85018632021-10-18 Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study Ströbele, Dragan Othman, Ahmed Alevizakos, Vasilios Turan, Mesut von See, Constantin J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The orthodontic spring materials in use have a significant influence on the applied forces. The prerequisite to identify the in vitro< force deflection of the CAD/CAM fabricated springs is considered mandatory to identify the material characteristics. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the mechanical load on 3D printed springs using different coil heights. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The springs were digitally designed with different coil heights using Autodesk Netfabb CAD software (San Rafael, CA, USA). Test specimens were manufactured using 3D printable experimental flexible material (Code: BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided according to the coil height into five groups, group A (n=4mm), group B (n=6mm), group C (n=8mm), group D (n=10mm) and group E (n=12mm). All group specimens were mechanically tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using K-S-Test to compare the values of each to the control group (p< 0.001). RESULTS: The highest value in all groups was achieved by 5.43 N/mm in group A, while the lowest value was achieved by 0.11 N/mm in group E. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed springs are mechanically affected by the coil heights and there is a direct correlation to the resulting force. Furthermore, the variations within the investigated groups must be thoroughly investigated prior to clinical application. Key words:CAD/CAM, 3D printing, Orthodontics, mechanical testing, material evaluation. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8501863/ /pubmed/34667491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57908 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ströbele, Dragan Othman, Ahmed Alevizakos, Vasilios Turan, Mesut von See, Constantin Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study |
title | Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study |
title_full | Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study |
title_short | Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study |
title_sort | mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57908 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strobeledragan mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy AT othmanahmed mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy AT alevizakosvasilios mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy AT turanmesut mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy AT vonseeconstantin mechanicalevaluationforthreedimensionalprintedorthodonticspringswithdifferentheightsinvitrostudy |