Cargando…

Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes

BACKGROUND: Surface treatments are expected to be a reason for alteration in fracture resistance of zirconia. This study evaluated the effect of post-sintering processes on the fracture toughness of different types of monolithic zirconia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Classical- (Cz) and high-translucent (H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juntavee, Niwut, Juntavee, Apa, Phattharasophachai, Thipradi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667496
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.58717
_version_ 1784580765993926656
author Juntavee, Niwut
Juntavee, Apa
Phattharasophachai, Thipradi
author_facet Juntavee, Niwut
Juntavee, Apa
Phattharasophachai, Thipradi
author_sort Juntavee, Niwut
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surface treatments are expected to be a reason for alteration in fracture resistance of zirconia. This study evaluated the effect of post-sintering processes on the fracture toughness of different types of monolithic zirconia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Classical- (Cz) and high-translucent (Hz) monolithic zirconia discs (1.2 mm thickness, 14 mm in Ø) were prepared, and randomly divided for surface treatments with 1) as-glazed (AG); 2) finished and polished (FP); 3) finished, polished, and overglazed (FPOG); and 4) finished, polished, and heat-treated (FPHT) technique (n=15/group). Fracture toughness (KIC) was determined with indentation fracture toughness method at load 1 kg for AG, FPOG and 10 kg for FP, FPHT with 15 sec dwelling time. Weibull analysis was applied for survival probability, Weibull modulus (m), and characteristic toughness (K0). Microstructures were examined with SEM and XRD. ANOVA and multiple comparisons were determined for significant differences (α=0.05). RESULTS: The mean±sd value of KIC (MPa.m1/2), m, and K0 were 1.60±0.19, 7.27, 1.71 for CzAG; 9.57±0.89, 9.97, 10.96 for CzFP; 1.61±0.15, 10.56, 1.68 for CzFPOG; 6.45±0.31, 20.31, 6.60 for CzFPHT; 1.45±0.13, 10.91, 1.51 for HzAG; 6.58±0.24, 27.00, 6.70 for HzFP; 1.24±0.05, 23.90, 1.27 for HzFPOG; and 5.07±0.16, 30.51, 5.15 for HzFPHT. The KIC was significantly affected by the post-sintering process, type of zirconia (p<0.05). The Cz indicated a significantly higher KIC than Hz. The FP significantly enhanced KIC, while OG was unable to raise KIC. HT reduced KIC due to reverse phase transformation. CONCLUSIONS: Post-sintering processes caused alteration in fracture resistance of zirconia. Fracture toughness was enhanced with FP, but not with either OG or HT process for both Cz and Hz. Surface treatment of zirconia through a finished-polished process is recommended, while glazing and heat-treated are not suggested. Key words:Fracture toughness, glazing, heat treatment, polishing, post-sintering process, zirconia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8501869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85018692021-10-18 Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes Juntavee, Niwut Juntavee, Apa Phattharasophachai, Thipradi J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Surface treatments are expected to be a reason for alteration in fracture resistance of zirconia. This study evaluated the effect of post-sintering processes on the fracture toughness of different types of monolithic zirconia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Classical- (Cz) and high-translucent (Hz) monolithic zirconia discs (1.2 mm thickness, 14 mm in Ø) were prepared, and randomly divided for surface treatments with 1) as-glazed (AG); 2) finished and polished (FP); 3) finished, polished, and overglazed (FPOG); and 4) finished, polished, and heat-treated (FPHT) technique (n=15/group). Fracture toughness (KIC) was determined with indentation fracture toughness method at load 1 kg for AG, FPOG and 10 kg for FP, FPHT with 15 sec dwelling time. Weibull analysis was applied for survival probability, Weibull modulus (m), and characteristic toughness (K0). Microstructures were examined with SEM and XRD. ANOVA and multiple comparisons were determined for significant differences (α=0.05). RESULTS: The mean±sd value of KIC (MPa.m1/2), m, and K0 were 1.60±0.19, 7.27, 1.71 for CzAG; 9.57±0.89, 9.97, 10.96 for CzFP; 1.61±0.15, 10.56, 1.68 for CzFPOG; 6.45±0.31, 20.31, 6.60 for CzFPHT; 1.45±0.13, 10.91, 1.51 for HzAG; 6.58±0.24, 27.00, 6.70 for HzFP; 1.24±0.05, 23.90, 1.27 for HzFPOG; and 5.07±0.16, 30.51, 5.15 for HzFPHT. The KIC was significantly affected by the post-sintering process, type of zirconia (p<0.05). The Cz indicated a significantly higher KIC than Hz. The FP significantly enhanced KIC, while OG was unable to raise KIC. HT reduced KIC due to reverse phase transformation. CONCLUSIONS: Post-sintering processes caused alteration in fracture resistance of zirconia. Fracture toughness was enhanced with FP, but not with either OG or HT process for both Cz and Hz. Surface treatment of zirconia through a finished-polished process is recommended, while glazing and heat-treated are not suggested. Key words:Fracture toughness, glazing, heat treatment, polishing, post-sintering process, zirconia. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8501869/ /pubmed/34667496 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.58717 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Juntavee, Niwut
Juntavee, Apa
Phattharasophachai, Thipradi
Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes
title Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes
title_full Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes
title_fullStr Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes
title_full_unstemmed Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes
title_short Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes
title_sort fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667496
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.58717
work_keys_str_mv AT juntaveeniwut fracturetoughnessofdifferentmonolithiczirconiauponpostsinteringprocesses
AT juntaveeapa fracturetoughnessofdifferentmonolithiczirconiauponpostsinteringprocesses
AT phattharasophachaithipradi fracturetoughnessofdifferentmonolithiczirconiauponpostsinteringprocesses