Cargando…

Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar

In 2017, a 560-ha area of hybrid poplar plantation in northern Poland showed symptoms of tree decline. Leaves appeared smaller, turned yellow–brown, and were shed prematurely. Twigs and smaller branches died. Bark was sunken and discolored, often loosened and split. Trunks decayed from the base. Phl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwaśna, Hanna, Szewczyk, Wojciech, Baranowska, Marlena, Behnke-Borowczyk, Jolanta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34213597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02464-7
_version_ 1784580818502418432
author Kwaśna, Hanna
Szewczyk, Wojciech
Baranowska, Marlena
Behnke-Borowczyk, Jolanta
author_facet Kwaśna, Hanna
Szewczyk, Wojciech
Baranowska, Marlena
Behnke-Borowczyk, Jolanta
author_sort Kwaśna, Hanna
collection PubMed
description In 2017, a 560-ha area of hybrid poplar plantation in northern Poland showed symptoms of tree decline. Leaves appeared smaller, turned yellow–brown, and were shed prematurely. Twigs and smaller branches died. Bark was sunken and discolored, often loosened and split. Trunks decayed from the base. Phloem and xylem showed brown necrosis. Ten per cent of trees died in 1–2 months. None of these symptoms was typical for known poplar diseases. Bacteria in soil and in the necrotic base of poplar trunk were analyzed with Illumina sequencing. Soil and wood were colonized by at least 615 and 249 taxa. The majority of bacteria were common to soil and wood. The most common taxa in soil were: Acidobacteria (14.76%), Actinobacteria (14.58%), Proteobacteria (36.87) with Betaproteobacteria (6.52%), (6.10%), Comamonadaceae (2.79%), and Verrucomicrobia (5.31%).The most common taxa in wood were: Bacteroidetes (22.72%) including Chryseobacterium (5.07%), Flavobacteriales (10.87%), Sphingobacteriales (9.40%) with Pedobacter cryoconitis (7.31%), Proteobacteria (73.79%) with Enterobacteriales (33.25%) including Serratia (15.30%) and Sodalis (6.52%), Pseudomonadales (9.83%) including Pseudomonas (9.02%), Rhizobiales (6.83%), Sphingomonadales (5.65%), and Xanthomonadales (11.19%). Possible pathogens were Pseudomonas, Rhizobium and Xanthomonas. The potential initial, endophytic character of bacteria is discussed. Soil and possibly planting material might be the reservoir of pathogen inoculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8502120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85021202021-10-22 Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar Kwaśna, Hanna Szewczyk, Wojciech Baranowska, Marlena Behnke-Borowczyk, Jolanta Arch Microbiol Original Paper In 2017, a 560-ha area of hybrid poplar plantation in northern Poland showed symptoms of tree decline. Leaves appeared smaller, turned yellow–brown, and were shed prematurely. Twigs and smaller branches died. Bark was sunken and discolored, often loosened and split. Trunks decayed from the base. Phloem and xylem showed brown necrosis. Ten per cent of trees died in 1–2 months. None of these symptoms was typical for known poplar diseases. Bacteria in soil and in the necrotic base of poplar trunk were analyzed with Illumina sequencing. Soil and wood were colonized by at least 615 and 249 taxa. The majority of bacteria were common to soil and wood. The most common taxa in soil were: Acidobacteria (14.76%), Actinobacteria (14.58%), Proteobacteria (36.87) with Betaproteobacteria (6.52%), (6.10%), Comamonadaceae (2.79%), and Verrucomicrobia (5.31%).The most common taxa in wood were: Bacteroidetes (22.72%) including Chryseobacterium (5.07%), Flavobacteriales (10.87%), Sphingobacteriales (9.40%) with Pedobacter cryoconitis (7.31%), Proteobacteria (73.79%) with Enterobacteriales (33.25%) including Serratia (15.30%) and Sodalis (6.52%), Pseudomonadales (9.83%) including Pseudomonas (9.02%), Rhizobiales (6.83%), Sphingomonadales (5.65%), and Xanthomonadales (11.19%). Possible pathogens were Pseudomonas, Rhizobium and Xanthomonas. The potential initial, endophytic character of bacteria is discussed. Soil and possibly planting material might be the reservoir of pathogen inoculum. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8502120/ /pubmed/34213597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02464-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kwaśna, Hanna
Szewczyk, Wojciech
Baranowska, Marlena
Behnke-Borowczyk, Jolanta
Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar
title Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar
title_full Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar
title_fullStr Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar
title_full_unstemmed Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar
title_short Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar
title_sort bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34213597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02464-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kwasnahanna bacteriaassociatedwithvascularwiltofpoplar
AT szewczykwojciech bacteriaassociatedwithvascularwiltofpoplar
AT baranowskamarlena bacteriaassociatedwithvascularwiltofpoplar
AT behnkeborowczykjolanta bacteriaassociatedwithvascularwiltofpoplar