Cargando…

Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs

Pooled samples are used in veterinary and human medicine as a cost-effective approach to monitor disease prevalence. Nonetheless, there is limited information on the effect of pooling on test performance, and research is required to determine the appropriate number of samples which can be pooled. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernandez-Medrano, Juan Heberth, Espinosa-Castillo, Luis Fernando, Rodriguez, Ana D., Gutierrez, Carlos G., Wapenaar, Wendela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34626237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02939-1
_version_ 1784580821224521728
author Hernandez-Medrano, Juan Heberth
Espinosa-Castillo, Luis Fernando
Rodriguez, Ana D.
Gutierrez, Carlos G.
Wapenaar, Wendela
author_facet Hernandez-Medrano, Juan Heberth
Espinosa-Castillo, Luis Fernando
Rodriguez, Ana D.
Gutierrez, Carlos G.
Wapenaar, Wendela
author_sort Hernandez-Medrano, Juan Heberth
collection PubMed
description Pooled samples are used in veterinary and human medicine as a cost-effective approach to monitor disease prevalence. Nonetheless, there is limited information on the effect of pooling on test performance, and research is required to determine the appropriate number of samples which can be pooled. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the use of pooled serum samples as a herd-level surveillance tool for infectious production-limiting diseases: bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) and Neospora caninum (NC), by investigating the maximum number of samples one can pool to identify one positive animal, using commercial antibody-detection ELISAs. Four positive field standards (PFS), one for each disease, were prepared by pooling highly positive herd-level samples diagnosed using commercially available ELISA tests. These PFS were used to simulate 18 pooled samples ranging from undiluted PFS to a dilution representing 1 positive in 1,000 animals using phosphate-buffered saline as diluent. A 1:10 dilution of the PFS resulted in positive results for IBR, BVD and EBL. Moreover, for IBR and BVD, results were still positive at 1:100 and 1:30 dilutions, respectively. However, for NC, a lower dilution (8:10) was required for a seropositive result. This study indicates that, at herd-level, the use of pooled serum is a useful strategy for monitoring infectious diseases (BVD, IBR and EBL) but not NC, using readily available diagnostic assays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8502132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85021322021-10-22 Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs Hernandez-Medrano, Juan Heberth Espinosa-Castillo, Luis Fernando Rodriguez, Ana D. Gutierrez, Carlos G. Wapenaar, Wendela Trop Anim Health Prod Regular Articles Pooled samples are used in veterinary and human medicine as a cost-effective approach to monitor disease prevalence. Nonetheless, there is limited information on the effect of pooling on test performance, and research is required to determine the appropriate number of samples which can be pooled. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the use of pooled serum samples as a herd-level surveillance tool for infectious production-limiting diseases: bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) and Neospora caninum (NC), by investigating the maximum number of samples one can pool to identify one positive animal, using commercial antibody-detection ELISAs. Four positive field standards (PFS), one for each disease, were prepared by pooling highly positive herd-level samples diagnosed using commercially available ELISA tests. These PFS were used to simulate 18 pooled samples ranging from undiluted PFS to a dilution representing 1 positive in 1,000 animals using phosphate-buffered saline as diluent. A 1:10 dilution of the PFS resulted in positive results for IBR, BVD and EBL. Moreover, for IBR and BVD, results were still positive at 1:100 and 1:30 dilutions, respectively. However, for NC, a lower dilution (8:10) was required for a seropositive result. This study indicates that, at herd-level, the use of pooled serum is a useful strategy for monitoring infectious diseases (BVD, IBR and EBL) but not NC, using readily available diagnostic assays. Springer Netherlands 2021-10-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8502132/ /pubmed/34626237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02939-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Hernandez-Medrano, Juan Heberth
Espinosa-Castillo, Luis Fernando
Rodriguez, Ana D.
Gutierrez, Carlos G.
Wapenaar, Wendela
Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
title Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
title_full Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
title_fullStr Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
title_full_unstemmed Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
title_short Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
title_sort use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available elisas
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34626237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02939-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezmedranojuanheberth useofpooledserumsamplestoassessherddiseasestatususingcommerciallyavailableelisas
AT espinosacastilloluisfernando useofpooledserumsamplestoassessherddiseasestatususingcommerciallyavailableelisas
AT rodriguezanad useofpooledserumsamplestoassessherddiseasestatususingcommerciallyavailableelisas
AT gutierrezcarlosg useofpooledserumsamplestoassessherddiseasestatususingcommerciallyavailableelisas
AT wapenaarwendela useofpooledserumsamplestoassessherddiseasestatususingcommerciallyavailableelisas