Cargando…
More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps
BACKGROUND: The obligate mutualism between fig trees (Ficus, Moraceae) and pollinating fig wasps (Agaonidae) is a model system for studying co-evolution due to its perceived extreme specificity, but recent studies have reported a number of examples of trees pollinated by more than one fig wasp or sh...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34626257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-021-00323-8 |
_version_ | 1784580837614813184 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Hui Liao, Yaolin Cheng, Yufen Jia, Yongxia Compton, Stephen G. |
author_facet | Yu, Hui Liao, Yaolin Cheng, Yufen Jia, Yongxia Compton, Stephen G. |
author_sort | Yu, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The obligate mutualism between fig trees (Ficus, Moraceae) and pollinating fig wasps (Agaonidae) is a model system for studying co-evolution due to its perceived extreme specificity, but recent studies have reported a number of examples of trees pollinated by more than one fig wasp or sharing pollinators with other trees. This will make the potential of pollen flow between species and hybridization more likely though only few fig hybrids in nature have been found. We reared pollinator fig wasps from figs of 13 Chinese fig tree species and established their identity using genetic methods in order to investigate the extent to which they were supporting more than one species of pollinator (co-pollinator). RESULTS: Our results showed (1) pollinator sharing was frequent among closely-related dioecious species (where pollinator offspring and seeds develop on different trees); (2) that where two pollinator species were developing in figs of one host species there was usually one fig wasp with prominent rate than the other. An exception was F. triloba, where its two pollinators were equally abundant; (3) the extent of co-pollinator within one fig species is related to the dispersal ability of them which is stronger in dioecious figs, especially in small species. CONCLUSIONS: Our results gave more examples to the breakdown of extreme specificity, which suggest that host expansion events where pollinators reproduce in figs other than those of their usual hosts are not uncommon among fig wasps associated with dioecious hosts. Because closely related trees typically have closely related pollinators that have a very similar appearance, the extent of pollinator-sharing has probably been underestimated. Any pollinators that enter female figs carrying heterospecific pollen could potentially generate hybrid seed, and the extent of hybridization and its significance may also have been underestimated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40529-021-00323-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8502184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85021842021-10-22 More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps Yu, Hui Liao, Yaolin Cheng, Yufen Jia, Yongxia Compton, Stephen G. Bot Stud Original Article BACKGROUND: The obligate mutualism between fig trees (Ficus, Moraceae) and pollinating fig wasps (Agaonidae) is a model system for studying co-evolution due to its perceived extreme specificity, but recent studies have reported a number of examples of trees pollinated by more than one fig wasp or sharing pollinators with other trees. This will make the potential of pollen flow between species and hybridization more likely though only few fig hybrids in nature have been found. We reared pollinator fig wasps from figs of 13 Chinese fig tree species and established their identity using genetic methods in order to investigate the extent to which they were supporting more than one species of pollinator (co-pollinator). RESULTS: Our results showed (1) pollinator sharing was frequent among closely-related dioecious species (where pollinator offspring and seeds develop on different trees); (2) that where two pollinator species were developing in figs of one host species there was usually one fig wasp with prominent rate than the other. An exception was F. triloba, where its two pollinators were equally abundant; (3) the extent of co-pollinator within one fig species is related to the dispersal ability of them which is stronger in dioecious figs, especially in small species. CONCLUSIONS: Our results gave more examples to the breakdown of extreme specificity, which suggest that host expansion events where pollinators reproduce in figs other than those of their usual hosts are not uncommon among fig wasps associated with dioecious hosts. Because closely related trees typically have closely related pollinators that have a very similar appearance, the extent of pollinator-sharing has probably been underestimated. Any pollinators that enter female figs carrying heterospecific pollen could potentially generate hybrid seed, and the extent of hybridization and its significance may also have been underestimated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40529-021-00323-8. Springer Singapore 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8502184/ /pubmed/34626257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-021-00323-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yu, Hui Liao, Yaolin Cheng, Yufen Jia, Yongxia Compton, Stephen G. More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps |
title | More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps |
title_full | More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps |
title_fullStr | More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps |
title_full_unstemmed | More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps |
title_short | More examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps |
title_sort | more examples of breakdown the 1:1 partner specificity between figs and fig wasps |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34626257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-021-00323-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuhui moreexamplesofbreakdownthe11partnerspecificitybetweenfigsandfigwasps AT liaoyaolin moreexamplesofbreakdownthe11partnerspecificitybetweenfigsandfigwasps AT chengyufen moreexamplesofbreakdownthe11partnerspecificitybetweenfigsandfigwasps AT jiayongxia moreexamplesofbreakdownthe11partnerspecificitybetweenfigsandfigwasps AT comptonstepheng moreexamplesofbreakdownthe11partnerspecificitybetweenfigsandfigwasps |