Cargando…
Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on the utility of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests a lack of benefit. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs with trial sequential analysis to investigate whe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.09.001 |
_version_ | 1784580847823749120 |
---|---|
author | Ling, Ryan Ruiyang Sim, Jackie Jia Lin Tan, Felicia Liying Tai, Bee Choo Syn, Nicholas Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv Fan, Bingwen Eugene Mitra, Saikat Ramanathan, Kollengode |
author_facet | Ling, Ryan Ruiyang Sim, Jackie Jia Lin Tan, Felicia Liying Tai, Bee Choo Syn, Nicholas Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv Fan, Bingwen Eugene Mitra, Saikat Ramanathan, Kollengode |
author_sort | Ling, Ryan Ruiyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on the utility of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests a lack of benefit. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs with trial sequential analysis to investigate whether convalescent plasma is futile in reducing mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We searched 6 databases from December 1, 2019 to August 1, 2021 for RCTs comparing the use of CP with standard of care or transfusion of non-CP standard plasma in patients with COVID-19. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 Tool. Random effects (DerSimonian and Laird) meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the aggregate risk for in-hospital mortality between both arms. We conducted a trial sequential analysis (TSA) based on the pooled relative risks (RRs) for in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the pooled RR for receipt of mechanical ventilation and mean difference in hospital length of stay. We included 18 RCTs (8702 CP, 7906 control). CP was not associated with a significant mortality benefit (RR: 0.95, 95%-CI: 0.86-1.04, P = .27, high certainty). Subgroup analysis did not find any significant differences (p(interaction) = 0.30) between patients who received CP within 8 days of symptom onset (RR: 0.97, 95%-CI: 0.79-1.19, P = .80), or after 8 days (RR: 0.79, 95%-CI: 0.57-1.10, P = .16). TSA based on a RR reduction of 10% from a baseline mortality of 20% found that CP was not effective, with the pooled effect within the boundary for futility. CP did not significantly reduce the requirement for mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.00, 95%-CI: 0.91-1.10, P = .99, moderate certainty) or hospital length of stay (+1.32, 95%-CI: -1.86 to +4.52, P = .42, low certainty). CP does not improve relevant clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, especially in severe disease. The pooled effect of mortality was within the boundary of futility, suggesting the lack of benefit of CP in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8502250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85022502021-10-12 Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Ling, Ryan Ruiyang Sim, Jackie Jia Lin Tan, Felicia Liying Tai, Bee Choo Syn, Nicholas Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv Fan, Bingwen Eugene Mitra, Saikat Ramanathan, Kollengode Transfus Med Rev Original Articles Current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on the utility of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests a lack of benefit. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs with trial sequential analysis to investigate whether convalescent plasma is futile in reducing mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We searched 6 databases from December 1, 2019 to August 1, 2021 for RCTs comparing the use of CP with standard of care or transfusion of non-CP standard plasma in patients with COVID-19. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 Tool. Random effects (DerSimonian and Laird) meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the aggregate risk for in-hospital mortality between both arms. We conducted a trial sequential analysis (TSA) based on the pooled relative risks (RRs) for in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the pooled RR for receipt of mechanical ventilation and mean difference in hospital length of stay. We included 18 RCTs (8702 CP, 7906 control). CP was not associated with a significant mortality benefit (RR: 0.95, 95%-CI: 0.86-1.04, P = .27, high certainty). Subgroup analysis did not find any significant differences (p(interaction) = 0.30) between patients who received CP within 8 days of symptom onset (RR: 0.97, 95%-CI: 0.79-1.19, P = .80), or after 8 days (RR: 0.79, 95%-CI: 0.57-1.10, P = .16). TSA based on a RR reduction of 10% from a baseline mortality of 20% found that CP was not effective, with the pooled effect within the boundary for futility. CP did not significantly reduce the requirement for mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.00, 95%-CI: 0.91-1.10, P = .99, moderate certainty) or hospital length of stay (+1.32, 95%-CI: -1.86 to +4.52, P = .42, low certainty). CP does not improve relevant clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, especially in severe disease. The pooled effect of mortality was within the boundary of futility, suggesting the lack of benefit of CP in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Elsevier Inc. 2022-01 2021-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8502250/ /pubmed/34782209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.09.001 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ling, Ryan Ruiyang Sim, Jackie Jia Lin Tan, Felicia Liying Tai, Bee Choo Syn, Nicholas Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv Fan, Bingwen Eugene Mitra, Saikat Ramanathan, Kollengode Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | convalescent plasma for patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.09.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lingryanruiyang convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT simjackiejialin convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tanfelicialiying convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT taibeechoo convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT synnicholas convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT muchelisharavansadasiv convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fanbingweneugene convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT mitrasaikat convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT ramanathankollengode convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |