Cargando…

Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on the utility of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests a lack of benefit. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs with trial sequential analysis to investigate whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ling, Ryan Ruiyang, Sim, Jackie Jia Lin, Tan, Felicia Liying, Tai, Bee Choo, Syn, Nicholas, Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv, Fan, Bingwen Eugene, Mitra, Saikat, Ramanathan, Kollengode
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.09.001
_version_ 1784580847823749120
author Ling, Ryan Ruiyang
Sim, Jackie Jia Lin
Tan, Felicia Liying
Tai, Bee Choo
Syn, Nicholas
Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv
Fan, Bingwen Eugene
Mitra, Saikat
Ramanathan, Kollengode
author_facet Ling, Ryan Ruiyang
Sim, Jackie Jia Lin
Tan, Felicia Liying
Tai, Bee Choo
Syn, Nicholas
Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv
Fan, Bingwen Eugene
Mitra, Saikat
Ramanathan, Kollengode
author_sort Ling, Ryan Ruiyang
collection PubMed
description Current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on the utility of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests a lack of benefit. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs with trial sequential analysis to investigate whether convalescent plasma is futile in reducing mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We searched 6 databases from December 1, 2019 to August 1, 2021 for RCTs comparing the use of CP with standard of care or transfusion of non-CP standard plasma in patients with COVID-19. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 Tool. Random effects (DerSimonian and Laird) meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the aggregate risk for in-hospital mortality between both arms. We conducted a trial sequential analysis (TSA) based on the pooled relative risks (RRs) for in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the pooled RR for receipt of mechanical ventilation and mean difference in hospital length of stay. We included 18 RCTs (8702 CP, 7906 control). CP was not associated with a significant mortality benefit (RR: 0.95, 95%-CI: 0.86-1.04, P = .27, high certainty). Subgroup analysis did not find any significant differences (p(interaction) = 0.30) between patients who received CP within 8 days of symptom onset (RR: 0.97, 95%-CI: 0.79-1.19, P = .80), or after 8 days (RR: 0.79, 95%-CI: 0.57-1.10, P = .16). TSA based on a RR reduction of 10% from a baseline mortality of 20% found that CP was not effective, with the pooled effect within the boundary for futility. CP did not significantly reduce the requirement for mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.00, 95%-CI: 0.91-1.10, P = .99, moderate certainty) or hospital length of stay (+1.32, 95%-CI: -1.86 to +4.52, P = .42, low certainty). CP does not improve relevant clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, especially in severe disease. The pooled effect of mortality was within the boundary of futility, suggesting the lack of benefit of CP in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8502250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85022502021-10-12 Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Ling, Ryan Ruiyang Sim, Jackie Jia Lin Tan, Felicia Liying Tai, Bee Choo Syn, Nicholas Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv Fan, Bingwen Eugene Mitra, Saikat Ramanathan, Kollengode Transfus Med Rev Original Articles Current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on the utility of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests a lack of benefit. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs with trial sequential analysis to investigate whether convalescent plasma is futile in reducing mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We searched 6 databases from December 1, 2019 to August 1, 2021 for RCTs comparing the use of CP with standard of care or transfusion of non-CP standard plasma in patients with COVID-19. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 Tool. Random effects (DerSimonian and Laird) meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the aggregate risk for in-hospital mortality between both arms. We conducted a trial sequential analysis (TSA) based on the pooled relative risks (RRs) for in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the pooled RR for receipt of mechanical ventilation and mean difference in hospital length of stay. We included 18 RCTs (8702 CP, 7906 control). CP was not associated with a significant mortality benefit (RR: 0.95, 95%-CI: 0.86-1.04, P = .27, high certainty). Subgroup analysis did not find any significant differences (p(interaction) = 0.30) between patients who received CP within 8 days of symptom onset (RR: 0.97, 95%-CI: 0.79-1.19, P = .80), or after 8 days (RR: 0.79, 95%-CI: 0.57-1.10, P = .16). TSA based on a RR reduction of 10% from a baseline mortality of 20% found that CP was not effective, with the pooled effect within the boundary for futility. CP did not significantly reduce the requirement for mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.00, 95%-CI: 0.91-1.10, P = .99, moderate certainty) or hospital length of stay (+1.32, 95%-CI: -1.86 to +4.52, P = .42, low certainty). CP does not improve relevant clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, especially in severe disease. The pooled effect of mortality was within the boundary of futility, suggesting the lack of benefit of CP in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Elsevier Inc. 2022-01 2021-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8502250/ /pubmed/34782209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.09.001 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ling, Ryan Ruiyang
Sim, Jackie Jia Lin
Tan, Felicia Liying
Tai, Bee Choo
Syn, Nicholas
Mucheli, Sharavan Sadasiv
Fan, Bingwen Eugene
Mitra, Saikat
Ramanathan, Kollengode
Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort convalescent plasma for patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT lingryanruiyang convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT simjackiejialin convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tanfelicialiying convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT taibeechoo convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT synnicholas convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT muchelisharavansadasiv convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fanbingweneugene convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mitrasaikat convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ramanathankollengode convalescentplasmaforpatientshospitalizedwithcoronavirusdisease2019ametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials