Cargando…

Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes

OBJECTIVE: Due to different concerns in using appropriate mosquito blood feeding techniques, this work focused on evaluating the effectiveness of two artificial mosquito feeding systems (Rutledge and Hemotek) and three different membranes (Parafilm, mouse and chicken skins). Female mosquitoes from a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seck, Fatoumata, Cailleau, Aurélie, Diallo, Mawlouth, Dia, Ibrahima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05799-y
_version_ 1784580852446920704
author Seck, Fatoumata
Cailleau, Aurélie
Diallo, Mawlouth
Dia, Ibrahima
author_facet Seck, Fatoumata
Cailleau, Aurélie
Diallo, Mawlouth
Dia, Ibrahima
author_sort Seck, Fatoumata
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Due to different concerns in using appropriate mosquito blood feeding techniques, this work focused on evaluating the effectiveness of two artificial mosquito feeding systems (Rutledge and Hemotek) and three different membranes (Parafilm, mouse and chicken skins). Female mosquitoes from an An. coluzzii strain aged between 2 and 5 days were exposed to blood with the two systems at time intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min) with blood used on the day of collection, the next day and 2 days after. RESULTS: Our results showed that the Hemotek system gave better blood feeding rates than the Rutledge system. Among the three membranes, the blood feeding rates with chicken and mouse skins were higher than those provided by the Parafilm membrane. Likewise, blood stored 1 day after collection gave higher levels than blood used on the day of collection and 2 days after. Regardless of the system, the lowest blood feeding rates were observed at 5 min compared to the other exposure times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8502276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85022762021-10-20 Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes Seck, Fatoumata Cailleau, Aurélie Diallo, Mawlouth Dia, Ibrahima BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Due to different concerns in using appropriate mosquito blood feeding techniques, this work focused on evaluating the effectiveness of two artificial mosquito feeding systems (Rutledge and Hemotek) and three different membranes (Parafilm, mouse and chicken skins). Female mosquitoes from an An. coluzzii strain aged between 2 and 5 days were exposed to blood with the two systems at time intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min) with blood used on the day of collection, the next day and 2 days after. RESULTS: Our results showed that the Hemotek system gave better blood feeding rates than the Rutledge system. Among the three membranes, the blood feeding rates with chicken and mouse skins were higher than those provided by the Parafilm membrane. Likewise, blood stored 1 day after collection gave higher levels than blood used on the day of collection and 2 days after. Regardless of the system, the lowest blood feeding rates were observed at 5 min compared to the other exposure times. BioMed Central 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8502276/ /pubmed/34627362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05799-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Seck, Fatoumata
Cailleau, Aurélie
Diallo, Mawlouth
Dia, Ibrahima
Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes
title Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes
title_full Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes
title_short Comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes
title_sort comparison of the efficiency and performance of two systems and three membranes for blood feeding mosquitoes
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34627362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05799-y
work_keys_str_mv AT seckfatoumata comparisonoftheefficiencyandperformanceoftwosystemsandthreemembranesforbloodfeedingmosquitoes
AT cailleauaurelie comparisonoftheefficiencyandperformanceoftwosystemsandthreemembranesforbloodfeedingmosquitoes
AT diallomawlouth comparisonoftheefficiencyandperformanceoftwosystemsandthreemembranesforbloodfeedingmosquitoes
AT diaibrahima comparisonoftheefficiencyandperformanceoftwosystemsandthreemembranesforbloodfeedingmosquitoes