Cargando…
Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany
In Germany, ~8 million patients take angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and 2.25 million of them valsartan. In 2018, contamination of generic ARBs with probable carcinogenic nitrosamines resulted in more than 30 recalls. The impact of such a huge recall has never been explored in Europe. We analyz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-00425-z |
_version_ | 1784580941679689728 |
---|---|
author | Rudolph, Ulrike Maria Enners, Salka Kieble, Marita Mahfoud, Felix Böhm, Michael Laufs, Ulrich Schulz, Martin |
author_facet | Rudolph, Ulrike Maria Enners, Salka Kieble, Marita Mahfoud, Felix Böhm, Michael Laufs, Ulrich Schulz, Martin |
author_sort | Rudolph, Ulrike Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Germany, ~8 million patients take angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and 2.25 million of them valsartan. In 2018, contamination of generic ARBs with probable carcinogenic nitrosamines resulted in more than 30 recalls. The impact of such a huge recall has never been explored in Europe. We analyzed the utilization of valsartan, all ARBs, and other alternative antihypertensive drugs in Germany. We used our database of anonymized dispensing data from >80% of community pharmacies at the expense of the statutory health insurance (SHI) funds from January 2017 to December 2019. We analyzed 290.8 million prescriptions, including all oral mono- and fixed-dose combinations of ARBs and plausible alternatives, i.e. ACE inhibitors (ACEi), beta-blockers (BB), and calcium channel blockers (CCB). Utilization was calculated by defined daily doses per 1000 SHI-insured persons per day (DID). Valsartan use decreased substantially after the recalls in July 2018 from 39.0 to 14.2 DID (−64%) in the second quarter of 2019 and to 16.9 DID (−57%) in the fourth quarter of 2019. Simultaneously, the use of alternative ARBs increased from 77.7 DID in the second quarter of 2018 to 121.9 DID (+57%) in the fourth quarter of 2019, mainly due to an increase of candesartan dispensing to 99.8 DID (+73%). There were no changes in the utilization of ACEi, BB, or CCB. The majority of recalled generic valsartan products were replaced by other ARBs, predominantly candesartan, despite documented drug shortages. In contrast to previous safety warnings/recalls, our data do not suggest an under-prescription of antihypertensives during this period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8502678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85026782021-10-22 Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany Rudolph, Ulrike Maria Enners, Salka Kieble, Marita Mahfoud, Felix Böhm, Michael Laufs, Ulrich Schulz, Martin J Hum Hypertens Article In Germany, ~8 million patients take angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and 2.25 million of them valsartan. In 2018, contamination of generic ARBs with probable carcinogenic nitrosamines resulted in more than 30 recalls. The impact of such a huge recall has never been explored in Europe. We analyzed the utilization of valsartan, all ARBs, and other alternative antihypertensive drugs in Germany. We used our database of anonymized dispensing data from >80% of community pharmacies at the expense of the statutory health insurance (SHI) funds from January 2017 to December 2019. We analyzed 290.8 million prescriptions, including all oral mono- and fixed-dose combinations of ARBs and plausible alternatives, i.e. ACE inhibitors (ACEi), beta-blockers (BB), and calcium channel blockers (CCB). Utilization was calculated by defined daily doses per 1000 SHI-insured persons per day (DID). Valsartan use decreased substantially after the recalls in July 2018 from 39.0 to 14.2 DID (−64%) in the second quarter of 2019 and to 16.9 DID (−57%) in the fourth quarter of 2019. Simultaneously, the use of alternative ARBs increased from 77.7 DID in the second quarter of 2018 to 121.9 DID (+57%) in the fourth quarter of 2019, mainly due to an increase of candesartan dispensing to 99.8 DID (+73%). There were no changes in the utilization of ACEi, BB, or CCB. The majority of recalled generic valsartan products were replaced by other ARBs, predominantly candesartan, despite documented drug shortages. In contrast to previous safety warnings/recalls, our data do not suggest an under-prescription of antihypertensives during this period. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8502678/ /pubmed/33057175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-00425-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Rudolph, Ulrike Maria Enners, Salka Kieble, Marita Mahfoud, Felix Böhm, Michael Laufs, Ulrich Schulz, Martin Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany |
title | Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany |
title_full | Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany |
title_fullStr | Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany |
title_short | Impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in Germany |
title_sort | impact of angiotensin receptor blocker product recalls on antihypertensive prescribing in germany |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-00425-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudolphulrikemaria impactofangiotensinreceptorblockerproductrecallsonantihypertensiveprescribingingermany AT ennerssalka impactofangiotensinreceptorblockerproductrecallsonantihypertensiveprescribingingermany AT kieblemarita impactofangiotensinreceptorblockerproductrecallsonantihypertensiveprescribingingermany AT mahfoudfelix impactofangiotensinreceptorblockerproductrecallsonantihypertensiveprescribingingermany AT bohmmichael impactofangiotensinreceptorblockerproductrecallsonantihypertensiveprescribingingermany AT laufsulrich impactofangiotensinreceptorblockerproductrecallsonantihypertensiveprescribingingermany AT schulzmartin impactofangiotensinreceptorblockerproductrecallsonantihypertensiveprescribingingermany |