Cargando…
Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Devices that combine an MR-scanner with a Linac for radiotherapy, referred to as MR-Linac systems, introduce the possibility to acquire high resolution images prior and during treatment. Hence, there is a possibility to acquire individualised learning sets for motion models f...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.004 |
_version_ | 1784580994069692416 |
---|---|
author | Fransson, Samuel Tilly, David Ahnesjö, Anders Nyholm, Tufve Strand, Robin |
author_facet | Fransson, Samuel Tilly, David Ahnesjö, Anders Nyholm, Tufve Strand, Robin |
author_sort | Fransson, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Devices that combine an MR-scanner with a Linac for radiotherapy, referred to as MR-Linac systems, introduce the possibility to acquire high resolution images prior and during treatment. Hence, there is a possibility to acquire individualised learning sets for motion models for each fraction and the construction of intrafractional motion models. We investigated the feasibility for a principal component analysis (PCA) based, intrafractional motion model of the male pelvic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D-scans of nine healthy male volunteers were utilized, FOV covering the entire pelvic region including prostate, bladder and rectum with manual segmentation of each organ at each time frame. Deformable image registration with an optical flow algorithm was performed for each subject with the first time frame as reference. PCA was performed on a subset of the resulting displacement vector fields to construct individualised motion models evaluated on the remaining fields. RESULTS: The registration algorithm produced accurate registration result, in general DICE overlap [Formula: see text] 0.95 across all time frames. Cumulative variance of the eigen values from the PCA showed that 50% or more of the motion is explained in the first component for all subjects. However, the size and direction for the components differed between subjects. Adding more than two components did not improve the accuracy significantly and the model was able to explain motion down to about 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: An individualised intrafractional male pelvic motion model is feasible. Geometric accuracy was about 1 mm based on 1–2 principal components. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8502906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85029062021-10-15 Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy Fransson, Samuel Tilly, David Ahnesjö, Anders Nyholm, Tufve Strand, Robin Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Devices that combine an MR-scanner with a Linac for radiotherapy, referred to as MR-Linac systems, introduce the possibility to acquire high resolution images prior and during treatment. Hence, there is a possibility to acquire individualised learning sets for motion models for each fraction and the construction of intrafractional motion models. We investigated the feasibility for a principal component analysis (PCA) based, intrafractional motion model of the male pelvic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D-scans of nine healthy male volunteers were utilized, FOV covering the entire pelvic region including prostate, bladder and rectum with manual segmentation of each organ at each time frame. Deformable image registration with an optical flow algorithm was performed for each subject with the first time frame as reference. PCA was performed on a subset of the resulting displacement vector fields to construct individualised motion models evaluated on the remaining fields. RESULTS: The registration algorithm produced accurate registration result, in general DICE overlap [Formula: see text] 0.95 across all time frames. Cumulative variance of the eigen values from the PCA showed that 50% or more of the motion is explained in the first component for all subjects. However, the size and direction for the components differed between subjects. Adding more than two components did not improve the accuracy significantly and the model was able to explain motion down to about 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: An individualised intrafractional male pelvic motion model is feasible. Geometric accuracy was about 1 mm based on 1–2 principal components. Elsevier 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8502906/ /pubmed/34660917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Fransson, Samuel Tilly, David Ahnesjö, Anders Nyholm, Tufve Strand, Robin Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy |
title | Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy |
title_full | Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy |
title_short | Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy |
title_sort | intrafractional motion models based on principal components in magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franssonsamuel intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy AT tillydavid intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy AT ahnesjoanders intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy AT nyholmtufve intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy AT strandrobin intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy |