Cargando…

Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Devices that combine an MR-scanner with a Linac for radiotherapy, referred to as MR-Linac systems, introduce the possibility to acquire high resolution images prior and during treatment. Hence, there is a possibility to acquire individualised learning sets for motion models f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fransson, Samuel, Tilly, David, Ahnesjö, Anders, Nyholm, Tufve, Strand, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.004
_version_ 1784580994069692416
author Fransson, Samuel
Tilly, David
Ahnesjö, Anders
Nyholm, Tufve
Strand, Robin
author_facet Fransson, Samuel
Tilly, David
Ahnesjö, Anders
Nyholm, Tufve
Strand, Robin
author_sort Fransson, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Devices that combine an MR-scanner with a Linac for radiotherapy, referred to as MR-Linac systems, introduce the possibility to acquire high resolution images prior and during treatment. Hence, there is a possibility to acquire individualised learning sets for motion models for each fraction and the construction of intrafractional motion models. We investigated the feasibility for a principal component analysis (PCA) based, intrafractional motion model of the male pelvic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D-scans of nine healthy male volunteers were utilized, FOV covering the entire pelvic region including prostate, bladder and rectum with manual segmentation of each organ at each time frame. Deformable image registration with an optical flow algorithm was performed for each subject with the first time frame as reference. PCA was performed on a subset of the resulting displacement vector fields to construct individualised motion models evaluated on the remaining fields. RESULTS: The registration algorithm produced accurate registration result, in general DICE overlap [Formula: see text] 0.95 across all time frames. Cumulative variance of the eigen values from the PCA showed that 50% or more of the motion is explained in the first component for all subjects. However, the size and direction for the components differed between subjects. Adding more than two components did not improve the accuracy significantly and the model was able to explain motion down to about 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: An individualised intrafractional male pelvic motion model is feasible. Geometric accuracy was about 1 mm based on 1–2 principal components.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8502906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85029062021-10-15 Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy Fransson, Samuel Tilly, David Ahnesjö, Anders Nyholm, Tufve Strand, Robin Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Devices that combine an MR-scanner with a Linac for radiotherapy, referred to as MR-Linac systems, introduce the possibility to acquire high resolution images prior and during treatment. Hence, there is a possibility to acquire individualised learning sets for motion models for each fraction and the construction of intrafractional motion models. We investigated the feasibility for a principal component analysis (PCA) based, intrafractional motion model of the male pelvic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D-scans of nine healthy male volunteers were utilized, FOV covering the entire pelvic region including prostate, bladder and rectum with manual segmentation of each organ at each time frame. Deformable image registration with an optical flow algorithm was performed for each subject with the first time frame as reference. PCA was performed on a subset of the resulting displacement vector fields to construct individualised motion models evaluated on the remaining fields. RESULTS: The registration algorithm produced accurate registration result, in general DICE overlap [Formula: see text] 0.95 across all time frames. Cumulative variance of the eigen values from the PCA showed that 50% or more of the motion is explained in the first component for all subjects. However, the size and direction for the components differed between subjects. Adding more than two components did not improve the accuracy significantly and the model was able to explain motion down to about 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: An individualised intrafractional male pelvic motion model is feasible. Geometric accuracy was about 1 mm based on 1–2 principal components. Elsevier 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8502906/ /pubmed/34660917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Fransson, Samuel
Tilly, David
Ahnesjö, Anders
Nyholm, Tufve
Strand, Robin
Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_full Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_fullStr Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_short Intrafractional motion models based on principal components in Magnetic Resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
title_sort intrafractional motion models based on principal components in magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8502906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.004
work_keys_str_mv AT franssonsamuel intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy
AT tillydavid intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy
AT ahnesjoanders intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy
AT nyholmtufve intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy
AT strandrobin intrafractionalmotionmodelsbasedonprincipalcomponentsinmagneticresonanceguidedprostateradiotherapy