Cargando…

Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison

Carotid stenosis in the extracranial tract determines 10–15% of all ischaemic strokes. The aim of treatment, therefore, is to prevent major neurological events. Carotid endarterectomy surgery has proved effective in this regard, with various randomized studies that have demonstrated its validity in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giudice, Rocco, Spataro, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34650363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suab099
_version_ 1784581129132572672
author Giudice, Rocco
Spataro, Claudio
author_facet Giudice, Rocco
Spataro, Claudio
author_sort Giudice, Rocco
collection PubMed
description Carotid stenosis in the extracranial tract determines 10–15% of all ischaemic strokes. The aim of treatment, therefore, is to prevent major neurological events. Carotid endarterectomy surgery has proved effective in this regard, with various randomized studies that have demonstrated its validity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. As an alternative, since the late 1990s, the endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis by stenting has gradually established itself. Numerous controlled clinical trials have compared surgery and carotid stenting in terms of perioperative outcomes (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure) and stroke prevention ipsilateral to the lesion treated during follow-up, evaluating both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. From the systematic review of the data, it is legitimate to state that stenting may represent a safe alternative to conventional surgery in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis under the age of 70, while endarterectomy is clearly safer and more effective than endovascular treatment for symptomatic older patients. On the other hand, as regards asymptomatic patients, the available evidence is limited and further data are needed to compare the two methods and to compare them with the best current medical therapy in order to draw conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8503472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85034722021-10-13 Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison Giudice, Rocco Spataro, Claudio Eur Heart J Suppl Articles Carotid stenosis in the extracranial tract determines 10–15% of all ischaemic strokes. The aim of treatment, therefore, is to prevent major neurological events. Carotid endarterectomy surgery has proved effective in this regard, with various randomized studies that have demonstrated its validity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. As an alternative, since the late 1990s, the endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis by stenting has gradually established itself. Numerous controlled clinical trials have compared surgery and carotid stenting in terms of perioperative outcomes (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure) and stroke prevention ipsilateral to the lesion treated during follow-up, evaluating both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. From the systematic review of the data, it is legitimate to state that stenting may represent a safe alternative to conventional surgery in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis under the age of 70, while endarterectomy is clearly safer and more effective than endovascular treatment for symptomatic older patients. On the other hand, as regards asymptomatic patients, the available evidence is limited and further data are needed to compare the two methods and to compare them with the best current medical therapy in order to draw conclusions. Oxford University Press 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8503472/ /pubmed/34650363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suab099 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. © The Author(s) 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Giudice, Rocco
Spataro, Claudio
Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison
title Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison
title_full Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison
title_fullStr Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison
title_short Treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison
title_sort treatment of carotid stenosis: surgery and stent in comparison
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34650363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suab099
work_keys_str_mv AT giudicerocco treatmentofcarotidstenosissurgeryandstentincomparison
AT spataroclaudio treatmentofcarotidstenosissurgeryandstentincomparison