Cargando…
Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: With the current COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare facilities have been lacking a steady supply of filtering facepiece respirators. To better address this challenge, the decontamination and reuse of these respirators is a strategy that has been studied by an increasing number of institu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00993-w |
_version_ | 1784581192041889792 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Alexandra Lotfinejad, Nasim Palomo, Rafael Zingg, Walter Parneix, Pierre Ney, Hervé Pittet, Didier |
author_facet | Peters, Alexandra Lotfinejad, Nasim Palomo, Rafael Zingg, Walter Parneix, Pierre Ney, Hervé Pittet, Didier |
author_sort | Peters, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the current COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare facilities have been lacking a steady supply of filtering facepiece respirators. To better address this challenge, the decontamination and reuse of these respirators is a strategy that has been studied by an increasing number of institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review in PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies were eligible when (electronically or in print) up to 17 June 2020, and published in English, French, German, or Spanish. The primary outcome was reduction of test viruses or test bacteria by log3 for disinfection and log6 for sterilization. Secondary outcome was physical integrity (fit/filtration/degradation) of the respirators after reprocessing. Materials from the grey literature, including an unpublished study were added to the findings. FINDINGS: Of 938 retrieved studies, 35 studies were included in the analysis with 70 individual tests conducted. 17 methods of decontamination were found, included the use of liquids (detergent, benzalkonium chloride, hypochlorite, or ethanol), gases (hydrogen peroxide, ozone, peracetic acid or ethylene oxide), heat (either moist with or without pressure or dry heat), or ultra violet radiation (UVA and UVGI); either alone or in combination. Ethylene oxide, gaseous hydrogen peroxide (with or without peracetic acid), peracetic acid dry fogging system, microwave-generated moist heat, and steam seem to be the most promising methods on decontamination efficacy, physical integrity and filtration capacity. INTERPRETATION: A number of methods can be used for N95/FFP2 mask reprocessing in case of shortage, helping to keep healthcare workers and patients safe. However, the selection of disinfection or sterilization methods must take into account local availability and turnover capacity as well as the manufacturer; meaning that some methods work better on specific models from specific manufacturers. SYSTEMATIC REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020193309. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00993-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8503730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85037302021-10-12 Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review Peters, Alexandra Lotfinejad, Nasim Palomo, Rafael Zingg, Walter Parneix, Pierre Ney, Hervé Pittet, Didier Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Review BACKGROUND: With the current COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare facilities have been lacking a steady supply of filtering facepiece respirators. To better address this challenge, the decontamination and reuse of these respirators is a strategy that has been studied by an increasing number of institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review in PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies were eligible when (electronically or in print) up to 17 June 2020, and published in English, French, German, or Spanish. The primary outcome was reduction of test viruses or test bacteria by log3 for disinfection and log6 for sterilization. Secondary outcome was physical integrity (fit/filtration/degradation) of the respirators after reprocessing. Materials from the grey literature, including an unpublished study were added to the findings. FINDINGS: Of 938 retrieved studies, 35 studies were included in the analysis with 70 individual tests conducted. 17 methods of decontamination were found, included the use of liquids (detergent, benzalkonium chloride, hypochlorite, or ethanol), gases (hydrogen peroxide, ozone, peracetic acid or ethylene oxide), heat (either moist with or without pressure or dry heat), or ultra violet radiation (UVA and UVGI); either alone or in combination. Ethylene oxide, gaseous hydrogen peroxide (with or without peracetic acid), peracetic acid dry fogging system, microwave-generated moist heat, and steam seem to be the most promising methods on decontamination efficacy, physical integrity and filtration capacity. INTERPRETATION: A number of methods can be used for N95/FFP2 mask reprocessing in case of shortage, helping to keep healthcare workers and patients safe. However, the selection of disinfection or sterilization methods must take into account local availability and turnover capacity as well as the manufacturer; meaning that some methods work better on specific models from specific manufacturers. SYSTEMATIC REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020193309. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00993-w. BioMed Central 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8503730/ /pubmed/34635165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00993-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Peters, Alexandra Lotfinejad, Nasim Palomo, Rafael Zingg, Walter Parneix, Pierre Ney, Hervé Pittet, Didier Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review |
title | Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review |
title_full | Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review |
title_short | Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review |
title_sort | decontaminating n95/ffp2 masks for reuse during the covid-19 epidemic: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00993-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersalexandra decontaminatingn95ffp2masksforreuseduringthecovid19epidemicasystematicreview AT lotfinejadnasim decontaminatingn95ffp2masksforreuseduringthecovid19epidemicasystematicreview AT palomorafael decontaminatingn95ffp2masksforreuseduringthecovid19epidemicasystematicreview AT zinggwalter decontaminatingn95ffp2masksforreuseduringthecovid19epidemicasystematicreview AT parneixpierre decontaminatingn95ffp2masksforreuseduringthecovid19epidemicasystematicreview AT neyherve decontaminatingn95ffp2masksforreuseduringthecovid19epidemicasystematicreview AT pittetdidier decontaminatingn95ffp2masksforreuseduringthecovid19epidemicasystematicreview |