Cargando…

Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold

The regeneration of load-bearing segmental bone defects remains a significant clinical problem in orthopedics, mainly due to the lack of scaffolds with composition and 3D porous structure effective in guiding and sustaining new bone formation and vascularization in large bone defects. In the present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kon, Elizaveta, Salamanna, Francesca, Filardo, Giuseppe, Di Matteo, Berardo, Shabshin, Nogah, Shani, Jonathan, Fini, Milena, Perdisa, Francesco, Parrilli, Annapaola, Sprio, Simone, Ruffini, Andrea, Marcacci, Maurilio, Tampieri, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.734486
_version_ 1784581220154212352
author Kon, Elizaveta
Salamanna, Francesca
Filardo, Giuseppe
Di Matteo, Berardo
Shabshin, Nogah
Shani, Jonathan
Fini, Milena
Perdisa, Francesco
Parrilli, Annapaola
Sprio, Simone
Ruffini, Andrea
Marcacci, Maurilio
Tampieri, Anna
author_facet Kon, Elizaveta
Salamanna, Francesca
Filardo, Giuseppe
Di Matteo, Berardo
Shabshin, Nogah
Shani, Jonathan
Fini, Milena
Perdisa, Francesco
Parrilli, Annapaola
Sprio, Simone
Ruffini, Andrea
Marcacci, Maurilio
Tampieri, Anna
author_sort Kon, Elizaveta
collection PubMed
description The regeneration of load-bearing segmental bone defects remains a significant clinical problem in orthopedics, mainly due to the lack of scaffolds with composition and 3D porous structure effective in guiding and sustaining new bone formation and vascularization in large bone defects. In the present study, biomorphic calcium phosphate bone scaffolds (GreenBone™) featuring osteon-mimicking, hierarchically organized, 3D porous structure and lamellar nano-architecture were implanted in a critical cortical defect in sheep and compared with allograft. Two different types of scaffolds were tested: one made of ion-doped hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium-phosphate (GB-1) and other made of undoped hydroxyapatite only (GB-2). X-ray diffraction patterns of GB-1 and GB-2 confirmed that both scaffolds were made of hydroxyapatite, with a minor amount of β-TCP in GB-1. The chemical composition analysis, obtained by ICP-OES spectrometer, highlighted the carbonation extent and the presence of small amounts of Mg and Sr as doping ions in GB-1. SEM micrographs showed the channel-like wide open porosity of the biomorphic scaffolds and the typical architecture of internal channel walls, characterized by a cell structure mimicking the natural parenchyma of the rattan wood used as a template for the scaffold fabrication. Both GB-1 and GB-2 scaffolds show very similar porosity extent and 3D organization, as also revealed by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Comparing the two scaffolds, GB-1 showed slightly higher fracture strength, as well as improved stability at the stress plateau. In comparison to allograft, at the follow-up time of 6 months, both GB-1 and GB-2 scaffolds showed higher new bone formation and quality of regenerated bone (trabecular thickness, number, and separation). In addition, higher osteoid surface (OS/BS), osteoid thickness (OS.Th), osteoblast surface (Ob.S/BS), vessels/microvessels numbers, as well as substantial osteoclast-mediated implant resorption were observed. The highest values in OS.Th and Ob. S/BS parameters were found in GB-1 scaffold. Finally, Bone Mineralization Index of new bone within scaffolds, as determined by micro-indentation, showed a significantly higher microhardness for GB-1 scaffold in comparison to GB-2. These findings suggested that the biomorphic calcium phosphate scaffolds were able to promote regeneration of load-bearing segmental bone defects in a clinically relevant scenario, which still represents one of the greatest challenges in orthopedics nowadays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8503888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85038882021-10-12 Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold Kon, Elizaveta Salamanna, Francesca Filardo, Giuseppe Di Matteo, Berardo Shabshin, Nogah Shani, Jonathan Fini, Milena Perdisa, Francesco Parrilli, Annapaola Sprio, Simone Ruffini, Andrea Marcacci, Maurilio Tampieri, Anna Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The regeneration of load-bearing segmental bone defects remains a significant clinical problem in orthopedics, mainly due to the lack of scaffolds with composition and 3D porous structure effective in guiding and sustaining new bone formation and vascularization in large bone defects. In the present study, biomorphic calcium phosphate bone scaffolds (GreenBone™) featuring osteon-mimicking, hierarchically organized, 3D porous structure and lamellar nano-architecture were implanted in a critical cortical defect in sheep and compared with allograft. Two different types of scaffolds were tested: one made of ion-doped hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium-phosphate (GB-1) and other made of undoped hydroxyapatite only (GB-2). X-ray diffraction patterns of GB-1 and GB-2 confirmed that both scaffolds were made of hydroxyapatite, with a minor amount of β-TCP in GB-1. The chemical composition analysis, obtained by ICP-OES spectrometer, highlighted the carbonation extent and the presence of small amounts of Mg and Sr as doping ions in GB-1. SEM micrographs showed the channel-like wide open porosity of the biomorphic scaffolds and the typical architecture of internal channel walls, characterized by a cell structure mimicking the natural parenchyma of the rattan wood used as a template for the scaffold fabrication. Both GB-1 and GB-2 scaffolds show very similar porosity extent and 3D organization, as also revealed by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Comparing the two scaffolds, GB-1 showed slightly higher fracture strength, as well as improved stability at the stress plateau. In comparison to allograft, at the follow-up time of 6 months, both GB-1 and GB-2 scaffolds showed higher new bone formation and quality of regenerated bone (trabecular thickness, number, and separation). In addition, higher osteoid surface (OS/BS), osteoid thickness (OS.Th), osteoblast surface (Ob.S/BS), vessels/microvessels numbers, as well as substantial osteoclast-mediated implant resorption were observed. The highest values in OS.Th and Ob. S/BS parameters were found in GB-1 scaffold. Finally, Bone Mineralization Index of new bone within scaffolds, as determined by micro-indentation, showed a significantly higher microhardness for GB-1 scaffold in comparison to GB-2. These findings suggested that the biomorphic calcium phosphate scaffolds were able to promote regeneration of load-bearing segmental bone defects in a clinically relevant scenario, which still represents one of the greatest challenges in orthopedics nowadays. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8503888/ /pubmed/34646817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.734486 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kon, Salamanna, Filardo, Di Matteo, Shabshin, Shani, Fini, Perdisa, Parrilli, Sprio, Ruffini, Marcacci and Tampieri. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Kon, Elizaveta
Salamanna, Francesca
Filardo, Giuseppe
Di Matteo, Berardo
Shabshin, Nogah
Shani, Jonathan
Fini, Milena
Perdisa, Francesco
Parrilli, Annapaola
Sprio, Simone
Ruffini, Andrea
Marcacci, Maurilio
Tampieri, Anna
Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold
title Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold
title_full Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold
title_fullStr Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold
title_full_unstemmed Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold
title_short Bone Regeneration in Load-Bearing Segmental Defects, Guided by Biomorphic, Hierarchically Structured Apatitic Scaffold
title_sort bone regeneration in load-bearing segmental defects, guided by biomorphic, hierarchically structured apatitic scaffold
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.734486
work_keys_str_mv AT konelizaveta boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT salamannafrancesca boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT filardogiuseppe boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT dimatteoberardo boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT shabshinnogah boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT shanijonathan boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT finimilena boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT perdisafrancesco boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT parrilliannapaola boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT spriosimone boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT ruffiniandrea boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT marcaccimaurilio boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold
AT tampierianna boneregenerationinloadbearingsegmentaldefectsguidedbybiomorphichierarchicallystructuredapatiticscaffold