Cargando…
多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor) and docetaxel, as the standard second-line treatments of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, have limited effects. There are few studies on whether docetaxel combine...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34455735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.26 |
_version_ | 1784581237644460032 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor) and docetaxel, as the standard second-line treatments of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, have limited effects. There are few studies on whether docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor can increase the efficacy and make patients better benefit. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for the second-line treatment of stage Ⅳ NSCLC patients. METHODS: Stage Ⅳ NSCLC patients (n=118) who received treatment at Shandong Cancer Hospital between October 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into observation group (n=69) and control group (n=49) according to different treatment plan. Observation group was given docetaxel plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, while control group was given PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The clinical curative effect and the incidence of adverse reactions of grade 3 and above were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The disease control rate (DCR) was higher in the observation group (89.9%) than that in the control group (73.5%) (P=0.019), and the objective response rate (ORR) showed no significant difference between observation group (24.6%) and control group (16.3%) (P=0.276). Till June 22, 2021, the 1-year PFS rate showed no difference between observation group (16.5%) and control group (7.7%) (P=0.205). During the treatment period, the adverse reactions of the two groups were mostly grade 1 to 2, and could be tolerated. The incidence of bone marrow suppression in observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the remaining adverse reactions were not statistically different from control group. Cox regression analysis showed that performance status (PS) (P=0.020) and age (P=0.049) were independent prognostic factors for the effect of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. RESULTS: The disease control rate (DCR) was higher in the observation group (89.9%) than that in the control group (73.5%) (P=0.019), and the objective response rate (ORR) showed no significant difference between observation group (24.6%) and control group (16.3%) (P=0.276). Till June 22, 2021, the 1-year PFS rate showed no difference between observation group (16.5%) and control group (7.7%) (P=0.205). During the treatment period, the adverse reactions of the two groups were mostly grade 1 to 2, and could be tolerated. The incidence of bone marrow suppression in observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the remaining adverse reactions were not statistically different from control group. Cox regression analysis showed that performance status (PS) (P=0.020) and age (P=0.049) were independent prognostic factors for the effect of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. CONCLUSION: The second-line treatment with docetaxel plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in patients with stage Ⅳ NSCLC can improve the DCR and prolong the PFS, and the adverse reactions are tolerable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8503983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85039832021-10-22 多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor) and docetaxel, as the standard second-line treatments of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, have limited effects. There are few studies on whether docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor can increase the efficacy and make patients better benefit. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for the second-line treatment of stage Ⅳ NSCLC patients. METHODS: Stage Ⅳ NSCLC patients (n=118) who received treatment at Shandong Cancer Hospital between October 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into observation group (n=69) and control group (n=49) according to different treatment plan. Observation group was given docetaxel plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, while control group was given PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The clinical curative effect and the incidence of adverse reactions of grade 3 and above were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The disease control rate (DCR) was higher in the observation group (89.9%) than that in the control group (73.5%) (P=0.019), and the objective response rate (ORR) showed no significant difference between observation group (24.6%) and control group (16.3%) (P=0.276). Till June 22, 2021, the 1-year PFS rate showed no difference between observation group (16.5%) and control group (7.7%) (P=0.205). During the treatment period, the adverse reactions of the two groups were mostly grade 1 to 2, and could be tolerated. The incidence of bone marrow suppression in observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the remaining adverse reactions were not statistically different from control group. Cox regression analysis showed that performance status (PS) (P=0.020) and age (P=0.049) were independent prognostic factors for the effect of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. RESULTS: The disease control rate (DCR) was higher in the observation group (89.9%) than that in the control group (73.5%) (P=0.019), and the objective response rate (ORR) showed no significant difference between observation group (24.6%) and control group (16.3%) (P=0.276). Till June 22, 2021, the 1-year PFS rate showed no difference between observation group (16.5%) and control group (7.7%) (P=0.205). During the treatment period, the adverse reactions of the two groups were mostly grade 1 to 2, and could be tolerated. The incidence of bone marrow suppression in observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the remaining adverse reactions were not statistically different from control group. Cox regression analysis showed that performance status (PS) (P=0.020) and age (P=0.049) were independent prognostic factors for the effect of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. CONCLUSION: The second-line treatment with docetaxel plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in patients with stage Ⅳ NSCLC can improve the DCR and prolong the PFS, and the adverse reactions are tolerable. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8503983/ /pubmed/34455735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.26 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | 临床研究 多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 |
title | 多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 |
title_full | 多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 |
title_fullStr | 多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 |
title_full_unstemmed | 多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 |
title_short | 多西他赛联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 |
title_sort | 多西他赛联合pd-1/pd-l1抑制剂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 |
topic | 临床研究 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8503983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34455735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duōxītāsàiliánhépd1pdl1yìzhìjìèrxiànzhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángfēnxī AT duōxītāsàiliánhépd1pdl1yìzhìjìèrxiànzhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángfēnxī AT duōxītāsàiliánhépd1pdl1yìzhìjìèrxiànzhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángfēnxī AT duōxītāsàiliánhépd1pdl1yìzhìjìèrxiànzhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángfēnxī AT duōxītāsàiliánhépd1pdl1yìzhìjìèrxiànzhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángfēnxī AT duōxītāsàiliánhépd1pdl1yìzhìjìèrxiànzhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángfēnxī AT duōxītāsàiliánhépd1pdl1yìzhìjìèrxiànzhìliáowǎnqīfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáidelínchuángfēnxī |