Cargando…

Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears may result from repeated mechanical deformation of the cuff tendons, and internal impingement of the supraspinatus tendon against the glenoid is one such proposed mechanism of deformation. PURPOSE: To (1) describe the changing proximity of the supraspinatus tendon to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saini, Gaura, Lawrence, Rebekah L., Staker, Justin L., Braman, Jonathan P., Ludewig, Paula M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211036908
_version_ 1784581291609423872
author Saini, Gaura
Lawrence, Rebekah L.
Staker, Justin L.
Braman, Jonathan P.
Ludewig, Paula M.
author_facet Saini, Gaura
Lawrence, Rebekah L.
Staker, Justin L.
Braman, Jonathan P.
Ludewig, Paula M.
author_sort Saini, Gaura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears may result from repeated mechanical deformation of the cuff tendons, and internal impingement of the supraspinatus tendon against the glenoid is one such proposed mechanism of deformation. PURPOSE: To (1) describe the changing proximity of the supraspinatus tendon to the glenoid during a simulated overhead reaching task and (2) determine the relationship between scapular morphology and this proximity. Additionally, the patterns of supraspinatus-to-glenoid proximity were compared with previously described patterns of supraspinatus-to-coracoacromial arch proximity. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Shoulder models were created from magnetic resonance images of 20 participants. Standardized kinematics were imposed on the models to simulate functional reaching, and the minimum distances between the supraspinatus tendon and the glenoid and the supraspinatus footprint and the glenoid were calculated every 5° between 0° and 150° of humerothoracic elevation. The angle at which contact between the supraspinatus and the glenoid occurred was documented. Additionally, the relationship between glenoid morphology (version and inclination) and the contact angle was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the minimum distances, and glenoid morphology was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients and simple linear regressions. RESULTS: The minimum distances between the tendon and the glenoid and between the footprint and the glenoid decreased as elevation increased. Contact between the tendon and the glenoid occurred in all participant models at a mean elevation of 123° ± 10°. Contact between the footprint and the glenoid occurred in 13 of 20 models at a mean of 139° ± 10°. Less glenoid retroversion was associated with lower tendon-to-glenoid contact angles (r = –0.76; R (2) = 0.58; P < .01). CONCLUSION: This study found that the supraspinatus tendon progressively approximated the glenoid during simulated overhead reaching. Additionally, all participant models eventually made contact with the glenoid by 150° of humerothoracic elevation, although anatomic factors influenced the precise angle at which contact occurred. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Contact between the supraspinatus and the glenoid may occur frequently within the range of elevation required for overhead activities. Therefore, internal impingement may be a prevalent mechanism for rotator cuff deformation that could contribute to cuff pathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8504240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85042402021-10-12 Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion Saini, Gaura Lawrence, Rebekah L. Staker, Justin L. Braman, Jonathan P. Ludewig, Paula M. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears may result from repeated mechanical deformation of the cuff tendons, and internal impingement of the supraspinatus tendon against the glenoid is one such proposed mechanism of deformation. PURPOSE: To (1) describe the changing proximity of the supraspinatus tendon to the glenoid during a simulated overhead reaching task and (2) determine the relationship between scapular morphology and this proximity. Additionally, the patterns of supraspinatus-to-glenoid proximity were compared with previously described patterns of supraspinatus-to-coracoacromial arch proximity. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Shoulder models were created from magnetic resonance images of 20 participants. Standardized kinematics were imposed on the models to simulate functional reaching, and the minimum distances between the supraspinatus tendon and the glenoid and the supraspinatus footprint and the glenoid were calculated every 5° between 0° and 150° of humerothoracic elevation. The angle at which contact between the supraspinatus and the glenoid occurred was documented. Additionally, the relationship between glenoid morphology (version and inclination) and the contact angle was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the minimum distances, and glenoid morphology was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients and simple linear regressions. RESULTS: The minimum distances between the tendon and the glenoid and between the footprint and the glenoid decreased as elevation increased. Contact between the tendon and the glenoid occurred in all participant models at a mean elevation of 123° ± 10°. Contact between the footprint and the glenoid occurred in 13 of 20 models at a mean of 139° ± 10°. Less glenoid retroversion was associated with lower tendon-to-glenoid contact angles (r = –0.76; R (2) = 0.58; P < .01). CONCLUSION: This study found that the supraspinatus tendon progressively approximated the glenoid during simulated overhead reaching. Additionally, all participant models eventually made contact with the glenoid by 150° of humerothoracic elevation, although anatomic factors influenced the precise angle at which contact occurred. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Contact between the supraspinatus and the glenoid may occur frequently within the range of elevation required for overhead activities. Therefore, internal impingement may be a prevalent mechanism for rotator cuff deformation that could contribute to cuff pathology. SAGE Publications 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8504240/ /pubmed/34646898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211036908 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Saini, Gaura
Lawrence, Rebekah L.
Staker, Justin L.
Braman, Jonathan P.
Ludewig, Paula M.
Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion
title Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion
title_full Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion
title_fullStr Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion
title_full_unstemmed Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion
title_short Supraspinatus-to-Glenoid Contact Occurs During Standardized Overhead Reaching Motion
title_sort supraspinatus-to-glenoid contact occurs during standardized overhead reaching motion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211036908
work_keys_str_mv AT sainigaura supraspinatustoglenoidcontactoccursduringstandardizedoverheadreachingmotion
AT lawrencerebekahl supraspinatustoglenoidcontactoccursduringstandardizedoverheadreachingmotion
AT stakerjustinl supraspinatustoglenoidcontactoccursduringstandardizedoverheadreachingmotion
AT bramanjonathanp supraspinatustoglenoidcontactoccursduringstandardizedoverheadreachingmotion
AT ludewigpaulam supraspinatustoglenoidcontactoccursduringstandardizedoverheadreachingmotion