Cargando…

New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis

Access to palliative care for marginalized communities is frequently problematized as a major challenge facing palliative care services. The traditional response of asking what services can do for the disadvantaged has been invigorated by a new wave of public health measures that embrace death and d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawyer, Joseph M., Higgs, Paul, Porter, John D.H., Sampson, Elizabeth L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34647028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524211032984
_version_ 1784581300995227648
author Sawyer, Joseph M.
Higgs, Paul
Porter, John D.H.
Sampson, Elizabeth L.
author_facet Sawyer, Joseph M.
Higgs, Paul
Porter, John D.H.
Sampson, Elizabeth L.
author_sort Sawyer, Joseph M.
collection PubMed
description Access to palliative care for marginalized communities is frequently problematized as a major challenge facing palliative care services. The traditional response of asking what services can do for the disadvantaged has been invigorated by a new wave of public health measures that embrace death and dying as social processes and ask, what can be done together with such communities as partners working in palliative care. Such work has generated a significant amount of academic, social and political interests over the last 20 years; however, we are yet to see a consistent and sustained change in approach from providers. We argue that this is due to inherent tensions that arise when modelling death, dying and loss as a unified and shared social process. Unresolved tensions destabilize the theoretical foundations and risk misrepresentation of core philosophies. In this integrative review of 75 articles, we present previously undiscussed areas of contention drawing from a pan-disciplinary field of theoretical and empirical evidence. We conclude that new public health approaches lack a consistent and unified theoretical approach. From philosophical, ontological and existential ideas relating to how different stakeholders conceptualize death, to the processes by which communities are motivated and their constituent members empowered through responsibilized notions of duty and reciprocity, there is little acknowledgement of the complex tensions at hand. Increasing academic and political initiative alone is not enough to progress this movement in a manner that achieves its full potential. Instead, we must pay greater attention to the tensions described. This article aims to work with such tensions to better define the landscape of collective moral responsibility in end-of-life care. We believe that this is crucial if palliative care is to avoid becoming a technical speciality with community and communitization reduced to a mere technical solution to more profound questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8504281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85042812021-10-12 New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis Sawyer, Joseph M. Higgs, Paul Porter, John D.H. Sampson, Elizabeth L. Palliat Care Soc Pract Review Access to palliative care for marginalized communities is frequently problematized as a major challenge facing palliative care services. The traditional response of asking what services can do for the disadvantaged has been invigorated by a new wave of public health measures that embrace death and dying as social processes and ask, what can be done together with such communities as partners working in palliative care. Such work has generated a significant amount of academic, social and political interests over the last 20 years; however, we are yet to see a consistent and sustained change in approach from providers. We argue that this is due to inherent tensions that arise when modelling death, dying and loss as a unified and shared social process. Unresolved tensions destabilize the theoretical foundations and risk misrepresentation of core philosophies. In this integrative review of 75 articles, we present previously undiscussed areas of contention drawing from a pan-disciplinary field of theoretical and empirical evidence. We conclude that new public health approaches lack a consistent and unified theoretical approach. From philosophical, ontological and existential ideas relating to how different stakeholders conceptualize death, to the processes by which communities are motivated and their constituent members empowered through responsibilized notions of duty and reciprocity, there is little acknowledgement of the complex tensions at hand. Increasing academic and political initiative alone is not enough to progress this movement in a manner that achieves its full potential. Instead, we must pay greater attention to the tensions described. This article aims to work with such tensions to better define the landscape of collective moral responsibility in end-of-life care. We believe that this is crucial if palliative care is to avoid becoming a technical speciality with community and communitization reduced to a mere technical solution to more profound questions. SAGE Publications 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8504281/ /pubmed/34647028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524211032984 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Sawyer, Joseph M.
Higgs, Paul
Porter, John D.H.
Sampson, Elizabeth L.
New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis
title New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis
title_full New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis
title_fullStr New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis
title_full_unstemmed New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis
title_short New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis
title_sort new public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? an integrative literature review with thematic synthesis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34647028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524211032984
work_keys_str_mv AT sawyerjosephm newpublichealthapproachestopalliativecareabravenewhorizonoranimpracticalidealanintegrativeliteraturereviewwiththematicsynthesis
AT higgspaul newpublichealthapproachestopalliativecareabravenewhorizonoranimpracticalidealanintegrativeliteraturereviewwiththematicsynthesis
AT porterjohndh newpublichealthapproachestopalliativecareabravenewhorizonoranimpracticalidealanintegrativeliteraturereviewwiththematicsynthesis
AT sampsonelizabethl newpublichealthapproachestopalliativecareabravenewhorizonoranimpracticalidealanintegrativeliteraturereviewwiththematicsynthesis