Cargando…

Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that more male than female deaths are registered and a higher proportion of female deaths are certified as ‘garbage’ causes (ie, vague or ill-defined causes of limited policy value). This can reduce the utility of sex-specific mortality statistics for governments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adair, Tim, Gamage, U S H, Mikkelsen, Lene, Joshi, Rohina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006660
_version_ 1784581304916901888
author Adair, Tim
Gamage, U S H
Mikkelsen, Lene
Joshi, Rohina
author_facet Adair, Tim
Gamage, U S H
Mikkelsen, Lene
Joshi, Rohina
author_sort Adair, Tim
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that more male than female deaths are registered and a higher proportion of female deaths are certified as ‘garbage’ causes (ie, vague or ill-defined causes of limited policy value). This can reduce the utility of sex-specific mortality statistics for governments to address health problems. To assess whether there are sex differences in completeness and quality of data from civil registration and vital statistics systems, we analysed available global death registration and cause of death data. METHODS: Completeness of death registration for females and males was compared in 112 countries, and in subsets of countries with incomplete death registration. For 64 countries with medical certificate of cause of death data, the level, severity and type of garbage causes was compared between females and males, standardised for the older age distribution and different cause composition of female compared with male deaths. RESULTS: For 42 countries with completeness of less than 95% (both sexes), average female completeness was 1.2 percentage points (p.p.) lower (95% uncertainty interval (UI) −2.5 to –0.2 p.p.) than for males. Aggregate female completeness for these countries was 7.1 p.p. lower (95% UI −12.2 to −2.0 p.p.; female 72.9%, male 80.1%), due to much higher male completeness in nine countries including India. Garbage causes were higher for females than males in 58 of 64 countries (statistically significant in 48 countries), but only by an average 1.4 p.p. (1.3–1.6 p.p.); results were consistent by severity and type of garbage. CONCLUSION: Although in most countries analysed there was no clear bias against females in death registration, there was clear evidence in a few countries of systematic undercounting of female deaths which substantially reduces the utility of mortality data. In countries with cause of death data, it was only of marginally poorer quality for females than males.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8504355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85043552021-10-22 Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis Adair, Tim Gamage, U S H Mikkelsen, Lene Joshi, Rohina BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that more male than female deaths are registered and a higher proportion of female deaths are certified as ‘garbage’ causes (ie, vague or ill-defined causes of limited policy value). This can reduce the utility of sex-specific mortality statistics for governments to address health problems. To assess whether there are sex differences in completeness and quality of data from civil registration and vital statistics systems, we analysed available global death registration and cause of death data. METHODS: Completeness of death registration for females and males was compared in 112 countries, and in subsets of countries with incomplete death registration. For 64 countries with medical certificate of cause of death data, the level, severity and type of garbage causes was compared between females and males, standardised for the older age distribution and different cause composition of female compared with male deaths. RESULTS: For 42 countries with completeness of less than 95% (both sexes), average female completeness was 1.2 percentage points (p.p.) lower (95% uncertainty interval (UI) −2.5 to –0.2 p.p.) than for males. Aggregate female completeness for these countries was 7.1 p.p. lower (95% UI −12.2 to −2.0 p.p.; female 72.9%, male 80.1%), due to much higher male completeness in nine countries including India. Garbage causes were higher for females than males in 58 of 64 countries (statistically significant in 48 countries), but only by an average 1.4 p.p. (1.3–1.6 p.p.); results were consistent by severity and type of garbage. CONCLUSION: Although in most countries analysed there was no clear bias against females in death registration, there was clear evidence in a few countries of systematic undercounting of female deaths which substantially reduces the utility of mortality data. In countries with cause of death data, it was only of marginally poorer quality for females than males. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8504355/ /pubmed/34625458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006660 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Adair, Tim
Gamage, U S H
Mikkelsen, Lene
Joshi, Rohina
Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
title Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
title_full Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
title_fullStr Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
title_full_unstemmed Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
title_short Are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? Results from a global analysis
title_sort are there sex differences in completeness of death registration and quality of cause of death statistics? results from a global analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006660
work_keys_str_mv AT adairtim aretheresexdifferencesincompletenessofdeathregistrationandqualityofcauseofdeathstatisticsresultsfromaglobalanalysis
AT gamageush aretheresexdifferencesincompletenessofdeathregistrationandqualityofcauseofdeathstatisticsresultsfromaglobalanalysis
AT mikkelsenlene aretheresexdifferencesincompletenessofdeathregistrationandqualityofcauseofdeathstatisticsresultsfromaglobalanalysis
AT joshirohina aretheresexdifferencesincompletenessofdeathregistrationandqualityofcauseofdeathstatisticsresultsfromaglobalanalysis