Cargando…

E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study

AIM: To determine whether our E-diary can be used to diagnose migraine and provide more reliable migraine-related frequency numbers compared to patients’ self-reported estimates. METHODS: We introduced a self-developed E-diary including automated algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Casteren, Daphne S, Verhagen, Iris E, de Boer, Irene, de Vries Lentsch, Simone, Fronczek, Rolf, van Zwet, Erik W, MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette, Terwindt, Gisela M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03331024211010306
_version_ 1784581319890567168
author van Casteren, Daphne S
Verhagen, Iris E
de Boer, Irene
de Vries Lentsch, Simone
Fronczek, Rolf
van Zwet, Erik W
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Terwindt, Gisela M
author_facet van Casteren, Daphne S
Verhagen, Iris E
de Boer, Irene
de Vries Lentsch, Simone
Fronczek, Rolf
van Zwet, Erik W
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Terwindt, Gisela M
author_sort van Casteren, Daphne S
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine whether our E-diary can be used to diagnose migraine and provide more reliable migraine-related frequency numbers compared to patients’ self-reported estimates. METHODS: We introduced a self-developed E-diary including automated algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days, indicating whether a patient has migraine. Reliability of the E-diary diagnosis in combination with two previously validated E-questionnaires was compared to a physician’s diagnosis as gold standard in headache patients referred to the Leiden Headache Clinic (n = 596). In a subset of patients with migraine (n = 484), self-estimated migraine-related frequencies were compared to diary-based results. RESULTS: The first migraine screening approach including an E-headache questionnaire, and the E-diary revealed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 17%. In the second approach, an E-migraine questionnaire was added, resulting in a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 69%. Mean self-estimated monthly migraine days, non-migrainous headache days and days with acute medication use were different from E-diary-based results (absolute mean difference ± standard deviation respectively 4.7 ± 5.0, 6.2 ± 6.6 and 4.3 ± 4.8). CONCLUSION: The E-diary including algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days showed usefulness in diagnosing migraine. The use emphasised the need for E-diaries to obtain reliable information, as patients do not reliably recall numbers of migraine days and acute medication intake. Adding E-diaries will be helpful in future headache telemedicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8504420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85044202021-10-12 E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study van Casteren, Daphne S Verhagen, Iris E de Boer, Irene de Vries Lentsch, Simone Fronczek, Rolf van Zwet, Erik W MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Terwindt, Gisela M Cephalalgia Original Articles AIM: To determine whether our E-diary can be used to diagnose migraine and provide more reliable migraine-related frequency numbers compared to patients’ self-reported estimates. METHODS: We introduced a self-developed E-diary including automated algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days, indicating whether a patient has migraine. Reliability of the E-diary diagnosis in combination with two previously validated E-questionnaires was compared to a physician’s diagnosis as gold standard in headache patients referred to the Leiden Headache Clinic (n = 596). In a subset of patients with migraine (n = 484), self-estimated migraine-related frequencies were compared to diary-based results. RESULTS: The first migraine screening approach including an E-headache questionnaire, and the E-diary revealed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 17%. In the second approach, an E-migraine questionnaire was added, resulting in a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 69%. Mean self-estimated monthly migraine days, non-migrainous headache days and days with acute medication use were different from E-diary-based results (absolute mean difference ± standard deviation respectively 4.7 ± 5.0, 6.2 ± 6.6 and 4.3 ± 4.8). CONCLUSION: The E-diary including algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days showed usefulness in diagnosing migraine. The use emphasised the need for E-diaries to obtain reliable information, as patients do not reliably recall numbers of migraine days and acute medication intake. Adding E-diaries will be helpful in future headache telemedicine. SAGE Publications 2021-05-02 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8504420/ /pubmed/33938248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03331024211010306 Text en © International Headache Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
van Casteren, Daphne S
Verhagen, Iris E
de Boer, Irene
de Vries Lentsch, Simone
Fronczek, Rolf
van Zwet, Erik W
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Terwindt, Gisela M
E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study
title E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study
title_full E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study
title_fullStr E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study
title_short E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study
title_sort e-diary use in clinical headache practice: a prospective observational study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03331024211010306
work_keys_str_mv AT vancasterendaphnes ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT verhagenirise ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT deboerirene ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT devrieslentschsimone ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT fronczekrolf ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanzweterikw ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT terwindtgiselam ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy