Cargando…
E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study
AIM: To determine whether our E-diary can be used to diagnose migraine and provide more reliable migraine-related frequency numbers compared to patients’ self-reported estimates. METHODS: We introduced a self-developed E-diary including automated algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03331024211010306 |
_version_ | 1784581319890567168 |
---|---|
author | van Casteren, Daphne S Verhagen, Iris E de Boer, Irene de Vries Lentsch, Simone Fronczek, Rolf van Zwet, Erik W MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Terwindt, Gisela M |
author_facet | van Casteren, Daphne S Verhagen, Iris E de Boer, Irene de Vries Lentsch, Simone Fronczek, Rolf van Zwet, Erik W MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Terwindt, Gisela M |
author_sort | van Casteren, Daphne S |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To determine whether our E-diary can be used to diagnose migraine and provide more reliable migraine-related frequency numbers compared to patients’ self-reported estimates. METHODS: We introduced a self-developed E-diary including automated algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days, indicating whether a patient has migraine. Reliability of the E-diary diagnosis in combination with two previously validated E-questionnaires was compared to a physician’s diagnosis as gold standard in headache patients referred to the Leiden Headache Clinic (n = 596). In a subset of patients with migraine (n = 484), self-estimated migraine-related frequencies were compared to diary-based results. RESULTS: The first migraine screening approach including an E-headache questionnaire, and the E-diary revealed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 17%. In the second approach, an E-migraine questionnaire was added, resulting in a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 69%. Mean self-estimated monthly migraine days, non-migrainous headache days and days with acute medication use were different from E-diary-based results (absolute mean difference ± standard deviation respectively 4.7 ± 5.0, 6.2 ± 6.6 and 4.3 ± 4.8). CONCLUSION: The E-diary including algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days showed usefulness in diagnosing migraine. The use emphasised the need for E-diaries to obtain reliable information, as patients do not reliably recall numbers of migraine days and acute medication intake. Adding E-diaries will be helpful in future headache telemedicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8504420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85044202021-10-12 E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study van Casteren, Daphne S Verhagen, Iris E de Boer, Irene de Vries Lentsch, Simone Fronczek, Rolf van Zwet, Erik W MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Terwindt, Gisela M Cephalalgia Original Articles AIM: To determine whether our E-diary can be used to diagnose migraine and provide more reliable migraine-related frequency numbers compared to patients’ self-reported estimates. METHODS: We introduced a self-developed E-diary including automated algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days, indicating whether a patient has migraine. Reliability of the E-diary diagnosis in combination with two previously validated E-questionnaires was compared to a physician’s diagnosis as gold standard in headache patients referred to the Leiden Headache Clinic (n = 596). In a subset of patients with migraine (n = 484), self-estimated migraine-related frequencies were compared to diary-based results. RESULTS: The first migraine screening approach including an E-headache questionnaire, and the E-diary revealed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 17%. In the second approach, an E-migraine questionnaire was added, resulting in a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 69%. Mean self-estimated monthly migraine days, non-migrainous headache days and days with acute medication use were different from E-diary-based results (absolute mean difference ± standard deviation respectively 4.7 ± 5.0, 6.2 ± 6.6 and 4.3 ± 4.8). CONCLUSION: The E-diary including algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days showed usefulness in diagnosing migraine. The use emphasised the need for E-diaries to obtain reliable information, as patients do not reliably recall numbers of migraine days and acute medication intake. Adding E-diaries will be helpful in future headache telemedicine. SAGE Publications 2021-05-02 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8504420/ /pubmed/33938248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03331024211010306 Text en © International Headache Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles van Casteren, Daphne S Verhagen, Iris E de Boer, Irene de Vries Lentsch, Simone Fronczek, Rolf van Zwet, Erik W MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Terwindt, Gisela M E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study |
title | E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study |
title_full | E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study |
title_short | E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study |
title_sort | e-diary use in clinical headache practice: a prospective observational study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03331024211010306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vancasterendaphnes ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT verhagenirise ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT deboerirene ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT devrieslentschsimone ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT fronczekrolf ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT vanzweterikw ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT terwindtgiselam ediaryuseinclinicalheadachepracticeaprospectiveobservationalstudy |