Cargando…

Image‐guided volumetric‐modulated arc therapy of total body irradiation: An efficient workflow from simulation to delivery

INTRODUCTION: Using multi‐isocenter volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for total body irradiation (TBI) may improve dose uniformity and vulnerable tissue protection compared with classical whole‐body field technique. Two drawbacks limit its application: (1) VMAT‐TBI planning is time consuming;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Bingqi, Sheen, Cherian, Murphy, Erin, Magnelli, Anthony, Lu, Lan, Cho, YoungBin, Qi, Peng, Majhail, Navneet S, Xia, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34480829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13412
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Using multi‐isocenter volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for total body irradiation (TBI) may improve dose uniformity and vulnerable tissue protection compared with classical whole‐body field technique. Two drawbacks limit its application: (1) VMAT‐TBI planning is time consuming; (2) VMAT‐TBI plans are sensitive to patient positioning uncertainties due to beam matching. This study presents a robust planning technique with image‐guided delivery to improve dose delivery accuracy. In addition, a streamlined sim‐to‐treat workflow with automatic scripts is proposed to reduce planning time. MATERIALS: Twenty‐five patients were included in this study. Patients were scanned in supine head‐first and feet‐first directions. An automatic workflow was used to (1) create a whole‐body CT by registering two CT scans, (2) contour lungs, kidneys, and planning target volume (PTV), (3) divide PTV into multiple sub‐targets for planning, and (4) place isocenters. Treatment planning included feathered AP/PA beams for legs/feet and VMAT for the body. VMAT‐TBI was evaluated for plan quality, planning/delivery time, and setup accuracy using image guidance. RESULTS: VMAT‐TBI planning time can be reduced to a day with automatic scripts. Treatment time took around an hour per fraction. VMAT‐TBI improved dose coverage (PTV V100 increased from 76.8 ± 10.5 to 88.5 ± 2.6; p < 0.001) and reduced lung dose (lung mean dose reduced from 10.8 ± 0.7 Gy to 9.4 ± 0.8 Gy, p < 0.001) compared with classic AP/PA technique. CONCLUSION: A VMAT‐TBI sim‐to‐treat workflow with robust planning and image‐guided delivery was proposed. VMAT‐TBI improved the plan quality compared with classical whole‐body field techniques.